Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for أَثَـارَةࣲ مِّنۡ عِلۡـمٍ 𓂆

Channel

أَثَـارَةࣲ مِّنۡ عِلۡـمٍ 𓂆

@Atharh2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,232subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001528477360
TypeChannel
Username@Atharh2
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded17 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Atharh2

Growth

2,2322,2592,245.517 August 2026 — 2,259 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,258 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,256 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,251 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,247 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,243 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,238 subscribers6 September 2026 — 2,232 subscribers17 August 20266 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,228–2,263 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 18:552,232-6
2 Sept 2026, 09:122,238-5
30 Aug 2026, 14:462,243-4
27 Aug 2026, 21:022,247-4
25 Aug 2026, 03:552,251-5
22 Aug 2026, 08:272,256-2
18 Aug 2026, 13:172,258-1
17 Aug 2026, 18:462,259first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.82%
avg views ÷ 2,232 subscribers
Avg views / post
63.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held20 (16 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total63
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

44 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3170.5%
😢920.5%
👍49.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC63 viewsread 17 August 2026

إن للصدقة بركة وراحة لو علمها أهل الدنيا لاشتروها بأنفس أموالهم!

Signed زيـاد

8 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC142 views5 reactionsread 17 August 2026

يا رجال. لا يليق بك كرجل مسلم تضع أي تفاعل على منشور امرأة تتكلم فيه عن الزواج. إذا تنازلت عن حيائها لا تتنازل عن رجولتك. ولا يليق بك كرجل مسلم تتواجد في صفحة امرأة تستعرض نفسها وشكلها وحياتها ويدها ونقابها وحجابها. إذا تنازلت هي عن سمعتها فلا تتنازل عن مروؤتك واحفظ رجولتك وبنات المسلمين. ثم أسألك بالله هل تقبل أرى يد زوجتك أو نقابها أو حجابها؟ وهل تقبل أتفاعل مع منشورات زوجتك بالقلوب بحجة الفائدة وبحجة اضع ذلك للم

4👍1

Signed زيـاد

1 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC220 views1 reactionsread 17 August 2026

وإنّها لمجاهدة عظيمة، قد تبدأها بالتكلّف حتى تصير مصداق حالك وبالك.. - الفارس رحمه اللّٰه.

1

Signed زيـاد

28 Jul 2026, 13:38 UTC267 viewsread 17 August 2026

‏اللغة ينبغي أن نجدد حياتها، ونحييها على ألسنتنا وأقلامنا بلا هوادة في ذلك، ونمحو بها أمية الشعوب، ونرفع بها غشاء الجهل. العلّامة محمود شاكر.

Signed زيـاد

28 Jul 2026, 13:36 UTC247 viewsread 17 August 2026

ثم خفف اللّٰه على الإنسان؛ فأودع فيه قوة التخيُّل..

Signed زيـاد

27 Jul 2026, 18:09 UTC262 views5 reactionsread 17 August 2026

سبحان الله... ما تواضعتُ لشخصٍ بشكلٍ زائدٍ إلّا وتكبَّر عليَّ بقدر تواضُعي له! فافطِن واقتصِد.

5

Signed أحمد السعيد

26 Jul 2026, 13:43 UTC277 viewsread 17 August 2026

«وكيف تصبر على ما لم تحط به خبرًا» فسّر مواقفك للآخرين؛ لا تشق عليهم بتركهم لظنونهم وتفسيرات الشيطان.. إذا عُرِفَ السبب بطل العجب - إسماعيل الزمزمي.

Signed زيـاد

24 Jul 2026, 17:48 UTC290 views1 reactionsread 17 August 2026

«إن العَفيفةَ لا تُبدي مفاتنها ذات الحَياء تَغُضُّ الطَرفَ والبَصر!»

1

Signed محمد بن محمود

23 Jul 2026, 11:31 UTC288 views5 reactionsread 17 August 2026

من لطيف آداب المراسلة أن تختصر الطريق إلى المقصود. فلا حاجة لأن تُرسل: «السلام عليكم»، ثم تنتظر الرد، ثم تقول: «كيف الحال؟»، ثم تمضي في حديث تعلم أنت وصاحبك أن غايته طلبٌ أو استفسار. ابدأ بالسلام، ثم اجمع تحيتك وسؤالك وطلبك في رسالة واحدة؛ فهو أوضح، وأرفق بوقت صاحبك، وأدعى إلى سرعة الإجابة (:

👍32

Signed زيـاد

22 Jul 2026, 11:16 UTC278 viewsread 17 August 2026

﴿وسِيق الذين كفروا إلى جهنم ..﴾ ﴿وسِيق الذين اتقوا ربهم إلى الجنة ..﴾ فالكفار يُساقون إلى النار عُنفًا، والمؤمنون يُساقون إلى الجنة لُطفًا، فالسّوق يجمع الجنسين، ولكن شتّان بين سَوقٍ وسوق؛ فَسَوقُ أهل الجنة بغير تعبٍ ولا نصب، سَوقٌ ولكن برَوحٍ وطرب! - أبو القاسم القُشيري رحمه اللّٰه.

Signed زيـاد

21 Jul 2026, 23:33 UTC231 views2 reactionsread 17 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVZw7xfY5RM من أمتع الحواريات التي سمعتُها .. يقول النبي ﷺ : " يدخل الجنة أقوام أفئدتهم مثل أفئدة الطير " نحسب فياض الكندي واحدًا منهم ولا نزكيه على الله .. رحم الله فيّاضًا وغفر له وجعل مرضه رفعة في درجاته و بارك الله في عمر أمه وأهله ورزقهم الصبر .. في الأثر: « يَودُّ أهلُ العافِيةِ يومَ القيامةِ حينَ يُعطى أهلُ البلاءِ الثَّوابَ، لو أنَّ جلودَهم كانت قُرِضَت في الدُّنيا بالمَقاريض

2

Signed Kareem 3atif

21 Jul 2026, 20:12 UTC173 views5 reactionsread 17 August 2026

وقدمت المدينة ولها ضجيج بالبكاء كضجيج الحاج إذا أهلوا بالإحرام، فقلت: مه؟ قالوا: قبض رسول الله ﷺ. - الاستيعاب || لابن عبد البر.

😢5

Signed زيـاد

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Atharh2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

💌فتاوى المرأه المسلمه💌
@fatwa63 · 32,184
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 5 September 2026
وظائف || صعيد مصر
@QenaLuxorJobs · 63,580
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 21 August 2026
{رَبَّيَانِي صَغِيرًا} التربيةبالوحيين| قناةالتربية لأسماءمحمدلبيب
@rabayany_altarbeya_belwahyayn · 54,009
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
📚 أكاديمية ميراث للوعي الإسلامي 📚
@MerathAcademy · 92,024
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“أَثَـارَةࣲ مِّنۡ عِلۡـمٍ 𓂆” (@Atharh2), 2,232 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Atharh2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.