Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
43 measurements spanning 76 days, net -857. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,889–27,004 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Oct 2026, 13:34
26,018
-9
23 Oct 2026, 13:50
26,027
-9
22 Oct 2026, 16:48
26,036
-13
21 Oct 2026, 08:31
26,049
-15
20 Oct 2026, 04:17
26,064
-10
19 Oct 2026, 04:37
26,074
-8
18 Oct 2026, 01:01
26,082
-5
17 Oct 2026, 00:28
26,087
-12
16 Oct 2026, 00:28
26,099
-18
14 Oct 2026, 23:46
26,117
-9
13 Oct 2026, 14:37
26,126
-34
9 Oct 2026, 20:18
26,160
-40
5 Oct 2026, 15:56
26,200
-73
29 Sept 2026, 23:17
26,273
-91
18 Sept 2026, 00:18
26,364
-48
15 Sept 2026, 17:20
26,412
-16
14 Sept 2026, 00:19
26,428
-18
12 Sept 2026, 06:16
26,446
-20
10 Sept 2026, 00:57
26,466
-54
6 Sept 2026, 14:18
26,520
first reading
Engagement
55 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 103 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.5%
avg views ÷ 26,018 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,730
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 55 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026
Posts held
55 (21 June 2026 – 22 October 2026)
Views total
35,539
Reactions total
973
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Oct 2026, 02:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
29m 15s
Average length
2m 56s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,329 reactions across 55 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,498
80.8%
👍
216
4.99%
😁
132
3.05%
😢
115
2.66%
🥰
107
2.47%
💯
70
1.62%
🍓
58
1.34%
❤🔥
35
0.809%
👏
31
0.716%
😭
20
0.462%
🤩
10
0.231%
🔥
9
0.208%
👀
7
0.162%
✍
5
0.116%
🕊
4
0.092%
😎
4
0.092%
😍
3
0.069%
🤝
3
0.069%
🤔
1
0.023%
🫡
1
0.023%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,329 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
يوتيوب
ليه مش ملتزم بالصلاة رغم إنك عارف أهميتها؟ وليه كل ما تقرر تبدأ، ترجع تأجّل وتقول: لما أبقى أحسن هصلي؟ 🤔
في الحلقة دي من سؤال إجباري، هنتكلم عن الأسباب اللي بتخلّي ناس كتير تقصّر في الصلاة، من الصحبة والكسل والذنوب، لليأس والانشغال بالدنيا والتسويف، وهنناقش أفكار بتخلّي الإنسان يبعد عن الصلاة وهو فاكر إنه لسه عنده وقت!
هل لازم تبقى إنسان صالح عشان تبدأ تصلي؟ وهل رجوعك للصلاة وقت الشدة معناه إنك منافق؟ وإيه ح…
الصلاة مش مجرد فرض بنؤديه، دي نجاة وحماية وطمأنينة! 🤍 تعرف إزاي الصلاة تمحو ذنوبك وتحميك من الخوف وأذى الناس. وهل فعلًا الصلاة سبب في تحقيق أحلامك؟ وإيه خطورة التهاون فيها؟ 🔥 شاهد الحلقة كاملة، واكتشف مكانة الصلاة الحقيقية في حياتك!
ماذا لو كان أخطر أنواع الجهل هو أن تظن أنك تعرف؟ 👀
في الحلقة دي هنكتشف الوجه الآخر للجهل… أنواعه، تأثيره على حياتنا، ولماذا قد يفسد على الإنسان دنياه دون أن يشعر.
والأهم… هل التعليم فعلًا يجعلنا أكثر معرفة؟ أم ممكن يقودنا لوهم المعرفة؟
شاهد الحلقة للنهاية…
اللَّهمَّ صلِّ على محمَّدٍ وعلى آلِ محمَّدٍ كما صلَّيتَ على إبراهيمَ وآلِ إبراهيم؛ اللَّهُمَّ بارِك على محمَّدٍ وعلى آلِ محمَّدٍ كما باركتَ على إبراهيمَ وآلِ إبراهيم؛ إنَّك حميدٌ مجيد.
🎁الحمد لله والصلاة والسلام على نبيِّه وعبده، وآله وصحبه من بعده، وبعد:
يسر فريق (إنه القرآن) أن يعلن عن برنامجه السنوي:
(الارتباطُ بالقرآن - الدفعة الثامنة)
🔸عن البرنامج:
دورة إيمانية منهجية مكثفة لتحقيق الارتباط بكتاب الله (تشويقًا وتطبيقًا) لإعداد القلب استقبالًا لشهر القرآن ليتلقى فيه الوحي محاكاة للنزول الأول على قلب رسول الله ﷺ
🔸خطة البرنامج:
🗓المدة = 3 أشهر (+ شهر تطبيق عملي)
⌛️البداية السبت بإذن الله
(29ربيع …
ومن توفيق الله للعبد أن يمنعه الله ما يريد، لأنه سبحانه يعلم ما يصلح عبده وتستقيم به حياته، فيمنعه المرأة السوء، والصاحب السوء، والعمل السوء، ويصرفه للخير والنفع، ويرزقه بما ينصلح به دينه ودنياه
فسبحانه وتقدَّس، عليم حكيم!
قال في كتابه عن عبدٍ تقي من عباده: كَذَٰلِكَ لِنَصْرِفَ عَنْهُ السُّوءَ وَالْفَحْشَاءَ ۚ إِنَّهُ مِنْ عِبَادِنَا الْمُخْلَصِينَ.
فاللهم اصرف عنا السوء وأهل السوء، آمين.
❤90👍9🍓5🥰3
Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @eipo0o. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
حلقة جديدة النهارده إن شاء الله الساعة ٩ على اليوتيوب من سلسلة ؟
كلام معقول13%
اعقل الكلام78%
كلام عاقل9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 22 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
د.أحمد العربي - القناة الرسمية @Ahmed_Elaraby · 178,139#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
المهندس علاء حامد Alaa Hamed @Alaa_Hamed1 · 165,954 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 12 August 2026
د/ حازم شومان "قناة رسمية" @drhazemshouman · 260,482 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الساخر الهادف - Ibrahem Emam” (@eipo0o), 26,018 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eipo0o.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.