Channel
@Audiobooks_collection
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,281subscribers
-874 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001219335388 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Audiobooks_collection |
| Description | Quotes from great books and the books famous people recommend. Self-improvement, wisdom, psychology. Promotions and queries: @Blissmanagerbot ℹ️ DMCA DISCLOSURE: https://telegra.ph/DMCA-Disclosure-for-Audiobooks-collection-and-eBookscafe-channel-08-31 |
| Created | 12 April 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Audiobooks_collection |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 00:09 | 30,281 | -9 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 02:16 | 30,290 | -5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 03:08 | 30,295 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 02:08 | 30,302 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 23:50 | 30,305 | -2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:50 | 30,307 | +4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:06 | 30,303 | -10 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 02:37 | 30,313 | -2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:49 | 30,315 | -13 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:27 | 30,328 | -3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 23:06 | 30,331 | -2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 21:39 | 30,333 | -20 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:17 | 30,353 | -5 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 18:41 | 30,358 | -9 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:10 | 30,367 | -6 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:18 | 30,373 | -2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:08 | 30,375 | -10 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 16:07 | 30,385 | -11 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 14:47 | 30,396 | -14 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 12:16 | 30,410 | first reading |
318 posts held, back to 17 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 155 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 318 (17 May 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 22,645 |
| Reactions total | 50 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 10:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
620 reactions across 127 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 413 | 66.6% | |
| 💯 | 70 | 11.3% | |
| 🔥 | 51 | 8.23% | |
| 👍 | 34 | 5.48% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 1.13% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 0.968% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 0.806% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.484% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 0.484% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.323% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.323% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.323% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.323% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 0.161% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 0.161% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.161% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.161% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 0.161% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.161% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.161% | |
| 13 further kinds | 13 | 2.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 132 of the 318 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 631 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 318 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Audiobooks_collection. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 318 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 May 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
When it comes to controlling human beings there is no better instrument than lies. Because, you see, humans live by beliefs. And beliefs can be manipulated. The power to manipulate beliefs is the only thing that counts. Michael Ende, The Neverending Story @Audiobooks_collection
💯2
📚 5 books Shonda Rhimes recommends Compiled from public recommendations. 1️⃣ Their Eyes Were Watching God ✍️ Zora Neale Hurston No hour is ever eternity, but it has its right to weep. 2️⃣ Beloved ✍️ Toni Morrison She is not so afraid at night because she is the color of it. 3️⃣ Jane Eyre ✍️ Charlotte Bronte Reason, and not Feeling, is my guide; my ambition is unlimited; my desire to rise higher, to do more than o…
At seventeen the young woman had worked out how to improve her future prospects; she would seduce the Prince. Robert Reid, The Emperor @Audiobooks_collection
An unbelieved truth can hurt a man much more than a lie. It takes great courage to back truth unacceptable to our times. There's a punishment for it, and it's usually crucifixion. John Steinbeck, East of Eden @Audiobooks_collection
❤1💯1
Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. Kurt Vonnegut, Cat’s Cradle @Audiobooks_collection
🔥2😁2❤1
📚 5 books Jordan Peterson recommends Compiled from public recommendations. 1️⃣ Demons ✍️ Fyodor Dostoevsky I saw that he couldn't get along without me now, and I wouldn't have abandoned him for anything in the world. I stayed, and we remained sitting for two hours and more. 2️⃣ Factfulness ✍️ Hans Rosling There’s no room for facts when our minds are occupied by fear. 3️⃣ The Will to Power ✍️ Freidrich Nietzsche I…
❤3
Enough is the most underrated financial goal The hardest skill in money is getting the goalpost to stop moving. People with more than they will ever need still risk what they have for what they do not need. Know what enough looks like for you. Past that point, more money buys less and less, and can cost you everything that matters. Book: The Psychology of Money by Morgan Housel @Audiobooks_collection
❤2💯2
📚 5 books Tai Lopez recommends Compiled from public recommendations. 1️⃣ The Denial of Death ✍️ Ernest Becker The road to creativity passes so close to the madhouse and often detours or ends there. 2️⃣ The Laws of Human Nature ✍️ Robert Greene Results are important, but the way they are achieved, the process, is equally important. 3️⃣ Smart Women Finish Rich ✍️ David Bach 4️⃣ The Selfish Gene ✍️ Richard Dawkins …
❤3👍1😇1
They inspire you, they entertain you, and you end up learning a ton even when you don't know it Nicholas Sparks, Dear John @Audiobooks_collection
🤔4❤1
📚 5 books Michelle Obama recommends Compiled from public recommendations. 1️⃣ Song of Solomon ✍️ Toni Morrison You wanna fly, you got to give up the shit that weighs you down. 2️⃣ Exit West ✍️ Mohsin Hamid The end of the world can be cozy at times. 3️⃣ White Teeth ✍️ Zadie Smith 4️⃣ Commonwealth ✍️ Ann Patchett 5️⃣ An American Marriage ✍️ Tayari Jones But home isn't where you land; home is where you launch. You…
How much time he gains who does not look to see what his neighbour says or does or thinks, but only at what he does himself, to make it just and holy. Marcus Aurelius, Meditations @Audiobooks_collection
📚 5 books to understand people 1️⃣ Influence ✍️ Robert B. Cialdini A well-known principle of human behavior says that when we ask someone to do us a favor we will be more successful if we provide a reason. People simply like to have reasons for what they do. 2️⃣ The 48 Laws of Power ✍️ Robert Greene Do not wait for a coronation; the greatest emperors crown themselves. 3️⃣ Thinking, Fast and Slow ✍️ Daniel Kahneman…
❤5🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 318 posts we hold for @Audiobooks_collection. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 1 post on @Audiobooks_collection as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Quotes Collection • Quotes Archive • Book Snippets” (@Audiobooks_collection), 30,281 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Audiobooks_collection.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.