Channel
@Audiobooks_collection
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,776subscribers
-379 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001219335388 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Audiobooks_collection |
| Description | ℹ️DMCA DISCLOSURE: https://telegra.ph/DMCA-Disclosure-for-Audiobooks-collection-and-eBookscafe-channel-08-31 Sharing Insights from Books Contact : @Blissmanagerbot |
| Created | 12 April 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Audiobooks_collection |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 30,776 | -49 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 30,825 | -14 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 30,839 | -15 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 22:37 | 30,854 | -13 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:21 | 30,867 | -37 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 19:22 | 30,904 | -56 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 30,960 | -31 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:52 | 30,991 | -18 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:04 | 31,009 | -35 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:08 | 31,044 | -12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 31,056 | -15 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 31,071 | -14 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 31,085 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:28 | 31,093 | -12 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 31,105 | -14 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 31,119 | -12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 31,131 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 31,139 | -9 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 31,148 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 31,149 | first reading |
89 posts held, back to 17 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 58 of 66 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 89 (17 May 2026 – 19 September 2026) |
| Views total | 51,035 |
| Reactions total | 174 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Sept 2026, 05:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
508 reactions across 78 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 341 | 67.1% | |
| 💯 | 63 | 12.4% | |
| 🔥 | 40 | 7.87% | |
| 👍 | 32 | 6.30% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 0.787% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.591% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.591% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 0.591% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.394% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.394% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.394% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.394% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 0.197% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.197% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.197% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.197% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.197% | |
| 🙉 | 1 | 0.197% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.197% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.197% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 0.591% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 89 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 519 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Audiobooks_collection. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 89 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 May 2026 to 19 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📖 The book that keeps turning up. Different careers. Different decades. Different politics. Asked what to read, 8 of them landed on the same one. 📕 Atlas Shrugged ✍️ Ayn Rand I started my life with a single absolute: that the world was mine to shape in the image of my highest values and never to be given up to a lesser standard, no matter how long or hard the struggle. Austen Allred · Brian Armstrong · Elon Musk …
❤2
Give a bowl of rice to a man and you will feed him for a day. Teach him how to grow his own rice and you will save his life. Confucius ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ @Audiobooks_collection ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
❤1
In the present case it is a little inaccurate to say I hate everything. I am strongly in favor of common sense, common honesty and common decency. This makes me forever ineligible to any public office of trust or profit in the Republic. But I do not repine, for I am a subject of it only by force of arms. H.L. Mencken ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ @Audiobooks_collection ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
😭1
Happiness is something we reap from the seeds we sow. Plant misery seeds and that us what you reap. Stephen Richards, Think Your way to Success: Let Your Dreams Run Free ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ @Audiobooks_collection ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
💯1
Do you know how you get the urge to clean your room, and it’s no big deal? But when your mom tells you that you have to clean your room, you don't want to? That's me, anyway. Bill Konigsberg, Openly Straight ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ @Audiobooks_collection ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
😐1
The demon that you can swallow gives you its power, and the greater life’s pain, the greater life’s reply. Joseph Campbell, The Power of Myth ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ @Audiobooks_collection ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
❤1
If you argue and rankle and contradict, you may achieve a victory sometimes; but it will be an empty victory because you will never get your opponent's good will. Dale Carnegie, How to Win Friends & Influence People ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ @Audiobooks_collection ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
👍2
📚 5 books Reese Witherspoon recommends Compiled from public recommendations. 1️⃣ Fable ✍️ Adrienne Young Era un monstruo. Todos lo éramos. Y ahora esta tormenta nos iba a hacer pagar por ello. 2️⃣ Furia ✍️ Yamile Saied Méndez I was the barefoot schoolgirl in my barrio apartment; he was a star flashing past us all, and the glow would disappear with him when he left again. 3️⃣ The Guest List ✍️ Lucy Foley 4️⃣ Such…
❤1
Let others lead small lives, but not you.. Let others argue over small things, but not you.. Let others cry over small hurts, but not you.. Let others leave their future in someone else's hands, but not you. Jim Rohn ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ @Audiobooks_collection ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🔥2👍1
Make your ego porous. Will is of little importance, complaining is nothing, fame is nothing. Openness, patience, receptivity, solitude is everything. Rainer Maria Rilke ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ @Audiobooks_collection ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
💯1🙏1
How absurd it was that in all seven kingdoms, the weakest and most vulnerable of people - girls, women - went unarmed and were taught nothing of fighting, while the strong were trained to the highest reaches of their skill. Kristin Cashore, Graceling ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ @Audiobooks_collection ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
Imagination, of course, can open any door - turn the key and let terror walk right in. Truman Capote, In Cold Blood ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ @Audiobooks_collection ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🤷1
Showing the 12 most recent of 89 posts we hold for @Audiobooks_collection. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Quotes Collection • Quotes Archive • Book Snippets” (@Audiobooks_collection), 30,776 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Audiobooks_collection.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.