Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ThePeepTimes

Channel

ThePeepTimes

@ThePeepTimes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,996subscribers

-70 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001214086875
TypeChannel
Username@ThePeepTimes
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ThePeepTimes

Growth

6,9967,0677,031.56 August 2026 — 7,066 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,066 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,067 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,056 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,049 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,048 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,034 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,033 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,023 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,015 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,013 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,005 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,996 subscribers6 August 20268 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 33 days, net -70. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,985–7,078 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 14:556,996-9
3 Sept 2026, 07:067,005-8
31 Aug 2026, 12:137,013-2
28 Aug 2026, 14:247,015-8
25 Aug 2026, 08:547,023-10
22 Aug 2026, 09:527,033-1
18 Aug 2026, 21:127,034-14
15 Aug 2026, 19:347,048-1
12 Aug 2026, 03:427,049-7
9 Aug 2026, 09:117,056-11
6 Aug 2026, 12:507,067+1
6 Aug 2026, 04:207,066no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:197,066first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2858.3%
👍816.7%
🎉612.5%
🔥510.4%
🤣12.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2025 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
15.0%
3 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
384
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
645
over 16 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2025 to 4 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

4 Jul 2026, 18:01 UTC363 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Death is the great raw zipper of the colossal mind-grid unfastening the heavy winter coat of your name— Not a void, not a ditch, but the supreme jazz-collapse into the un-born, un-died, smoke-looping sky-juice of the Big It! No tracks, no ticket, no conductor, just the holy, wild, un-fenced spook-radiance of the grand Nowhere. The ultimate drop-out! Where the ego-engine conks out and you wake up as the entire sky-the

2👍1

14 May 2026, 18:17 UTC645 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026

It wasn’t deep, it wasn’t forever But it felt like the whole world buffered Every time u looked my way We talked in half sentences and emojis Laughed at jokes that weren’t even funny And I called it nothing just to sound cool But my chest didn’t get the memo Cause every seen hit different Every wwy felt like a plot twist First love hits like that tho Messy, fast, kinda stupid And somehow u never forget the lag it

4

10 Apr 2026, 12:17 UTC824 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Give reviews on the other writer's posts using #yourreview, who were invited you to review his/her post by giving #review hashtag. 🔗 View | ✨𝗕𝗢𝗢𝗦𝗧✨ 🔥 @tgWiz

👍1

29 Mar 2026, 19:13 UTC920 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

The Fragrance of Moments Life’s beauty isn't measured by how long we stay, In the bonds we forge or the words we say. Stability is but a shadow, a fleeting glass, As seasons change and the years must pass. The true essence lies in the golden light, Of those shared moments, pure and bright. Before the paths diverged and hands let go, In the warmth of the soul’s unspoken glow. It’s the laughter shared, the silence und

2

25 Mar 2026, 05:22 UTC761 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026

> Mushroom Vulture: Do you believe in magic? > Shinobi: Huh? > Mushroom Vulture: Have you seen Goncharov? > Shinobi: Umm... no? > Mushroom Vulture: An entire movie dreamt up by Tumblr, a collective fever dream turned into reality, one that spans mediums, crosses borders, and transcends language. And one of the best Mafia movies ever, no less. This is the power of meme magic. Once people start talking about something,

2🤣1

25 Mar 2026, 05:22 UTC515 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026

#review @WrytBot 🔗 View | ✨𝗕𝗢𝗢𝗦𝗧✨ 🔥 More on @tgWiz

🔥1

7 Mar 2026, 05:37 UTC646 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Crow cries at noon Sun split in two Smoke walking barefoot Through the avenue A crown of feathers Nailed to the sky Drums in the marrow Won’t let me die I left my name In a jar of salt Traded my shadow For thunderbolt Mother of ivy Swallowed the well Spat out a staircase Spiraling hell Down in the cellar Of bone and seed Priests of the mushroom Whispered the creed Forget your face Forget your skin Peel off the hour Y

2

28 Feb 2026, 18:52 UTC602 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026

I stare into the bottomless pitch dark My fears writhing like snakes in my stomach And even though there seems to be no horizon in sight I imagine seeing mountains in the distance Willing for the sun to rise I look at glowing clouds And though they seems to be glowing with dark I tell myself they are waiting for sun to come out It's an endless road and freezing cold And all the warmth I have is the dream of a home So

4👍1

18 Jan 2026, 13:38 UTC878 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026

"Black holes" I’ve been looking for a hole in this void, From where something could seep in. It could be pain or joy, it doesn’t matter As long as it made me feel like a human. I see the moments pass A camera vision, a papery feel The truth and lie blend into one As everything turns into grains of sand. How do I pour void into words? Turn black holes into light. How do I put soul in the dead? When the living have

👍32

14 Jan 2026, 18:01 UTC839 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Hey everyone — quick question 😊 Do you feel like storytelling today is still mostly stuck in the same old formats (just text, just books, just screens)? I’ve been thinking a lot about how stories could become more collaborative and immersive — involving writers, illustrators, sound designers, maybe even 3D artists someday. Curious to know what you all think: 👉 How do you imagine the future of storytelling? #review #n

🎉4

1 Jan 2026, 06:08 UTCviews —

ThePeepTimes pinned «Dear friends across our vibrant community 🌎 Wishing you all a joyful, peaceful, and inspiring New Year! 🎉🍾 As we step into 2026, let’s take a moment to celebrate the incredible journey we’ve shared. Over the years, our network of channels and groups has…»

1 Jan 2026, 06:07 UTC869 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Dear friends across our vibrant community 🌎 Wishing you all a joyful, peaceful, and inspiring New Year! 🎉🍾 As we step into 2026, let’s take a moment to celebrate the incredible journey we’ve shared. Over the years, our network of channels and groups has blossomed into a beautiful tapestry of voices, ideas, creativity, and connection. Whether through poetry, conversations, knowledge-sharing, or simple moments of lau

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ThePeepTimes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

@BooksThief
@BooksThief · 52,185
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 24 August 2026
Quotes Collection • Quotes Archive • Book Snippets
@Audiobooks_collection · 30,867
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 6 September 2026
THE HINDU News Papers
@THE_HINDU_News_Papers_Vocabulary · 264,173
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ThePeepTimes” (@ThePeepTimes), 6,996 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ThePeepTimes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.