Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Azizan Osman (Official)

Channel

Azizan Osman (Official)

@AzizanOsmanOfficial

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

39,338subscribers

-2,142 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001036645079
TypeChannel
Username@AzizanOsmanOfficial
DescriptionBuilding Entrepreneurs. Shaping Nations. Founder | Investor | Professor Helping Entrepreneurs Scale Businesses, Build Wealth & Build Legacies. https://AzizanOsman.com
CreatedBetween 1 January 2016 and 31 October 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/AzizanOsmanOfficial

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@AzizanOsmanOfficial/25943 · this entry27 Jul 2026, 05:56 UTC@RichWorksOfficial/1157827 Jul 2026, 05:59 UTC1.004 minutes
@RichWorksOfficial/1158030 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC@AzizanOsmanOfficial/25945 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC1.00under a minute
@RichWorksOfficial/1158131 Jul 2026, 01:24 UTC@AzizanOsmanOfficial/25946 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 01:24 UTC1.00under a minute
@RichWorksOfficial/1158231 Jul 2026, 11:27 UTC@AzizanOsmanOfficial/25947 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 11:27 UTC1.00under a minute
@RichWorksOfficial/115842 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC@AzizanOsmanOfficial/25956 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC1.00under a minute
@RichWorksOfficial/115853 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC@AzizanOsmanOfficial/25958 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@RichWorksOfficial9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@RichWorksOfficial (6–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @AzizanOsmanOfficial — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

39,33841,48040,4097 August 20267 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 92 days, net -2,142. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,017–41,801 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 12:4039,338-37
6 Nov 2026, 10:0539,375-18
5 Nov 2026, 10:4139,393-32
4 Nov 2026, 09:5839,425-38
3 Nov 2026, 07:3639,463-25
2 Nov 2026, 04:4139,488-12
1 Nov 2026, 01:0839,500-17
31 Oct 2026, 00:1739,517-26
29 Oct 2026, 22:2839,543-27
28 Oct 2026, 19:1939,570-23
27 Oct 2026, 19:4839,593-15
26 Oct 2026, 21:1139,608-29
25 Oct 2026, 23:3739,637-23
24 Oct 2026, 22:1739,660-10
23 Oct 2026, 23:0639,670-38
22 Oct 2026, 23:4039,708-27
22 Oct 2026, 00:2839,735-32
20 Oct 2026, 17:1939,767-29
19 Oct 2026, 18:0839,796-19
18 Oct 2026, 15:2839,815first reading

Engagement

203 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 179 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.21%
avg views ÷ 39,338 subscribers
Avg views / post
871
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
55
of 203 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held203 (27 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total36,594
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 22:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈9,780
Videos
≈3,710
Links
≈7,250

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
22m 15s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 55 posts held from the last 30 days (1.82%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 12:12 UTC247 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🤖 Nak buat marketing lebih mudah? AI boleh bantu! Nak cari idea content, tulis ayat promosi, buat perancangan marketing… semua ini boleh mengambil banyak masa kalau buat sendiri. Dengan bantuan AI, kerja marketing boleh jadi lebih mudah dan pantas. Yang penting, kita tahu cara menggunakannya untuk membantu bisnes. 🔥 AI: MARKETING DAH BERUBAH Esok pagi, jom ketahui bagaimana AI boleh membantu usahawan merancang da…

7 Nov 2026, 01:00 UTC469 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Mak Saya 83 Tahun Hari Ini, Dan Saya Tidak Ada Di Sisi Dia Mak saya asas kepada nilai dan prinsip saya. Dan itu buat saya sedar: siapa kita menjadi akan disalin oleh anak-anak kita. Baca penuh di sini: https://azizanosman.com/mak-saya-83-tahun-hari-ini/

6 Nov 2026, 01:01 UTC712 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Leader yang kuat bukan yang asyik tukar game. Leader yang kuat tahu bila perlu stay, improve dan grow. #DatukWira #Leadership #BusinessGrowth Tonton: https://youtube.com/shorts/Awgm1AJkj2k?feature=share

5 Nov 2026, 01:01 UTC862 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Cara upgrade bisnes anda macam upgrade iOS Jawapan ringkas: anda tidak perlu belajar semula semuanya. Anda perlu “plug in”. Satu sambungan yang mengemas kini cara kerja anda — bukan kursus dua hari yang anda lupakan dalam seminggu. Saya selalu gunakan satu analogi yang mudah difahami: telefon anda. Baca penuh di sini: https://azizanosman.com/cara-upgrade-bisnes-anda-macam-upgrade-ios/

4 Nov 2026, 01:00 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Mulai YA2028, gaji mesti dibayar melalui bank — kalau anda mahu potongan cukai Jawapan ringkas: bagi syarikat yang bukan MSME, ya. Mulai tahun taksiran 2028, potongan cukai untuk gaji hanya dibenarkan kalau gaji itu dibayar melalui institusi kewangan atau instrumen pembayaran tanpa tunai yang ditetapkan. Kalau anda masih membayar gaji secara tunai, anda tidak kehilangan pekerja. Anda kehilangan potongan cukai. Baca…

3 Nov 2026, 01:00 UTC≈1,160 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Hampir dua pertiga pemilik bisnes berumur 45 tahun ke atas. Itu mengubah cara anda patut buat keputusan. Jawapan ringkas: ia mengubah jangka masa anda — dan jangka masa menentukan keputusan mana yang patut anda buat. Hampir dua pertiga pemilik bisnes berumur 45 tahun ke atas. Fakta itu sepatutnya mengubah cara anda mengagihkan tiga tahun yang seterusnya. Ini datanya, dan kemudian apa yang saya akan buat dengannya. …

2 Nov 2026, 01:01 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Kalau anda 50 tahun, anda ada lima tahun — bukan dua puluh Jawapan ringkas: anda tidak ada masa untuk mencuba lima perkara. Anda ada masa untuk memilih satu dengan betul. Itu bukan batasan — itu kelebihan, kalau anda sanggup menggunakannya. Saya tulis ini sebagai sambungan kepada artikel sebelum ini tentang data umur pemilik bisnes. Baca penuh di sini: https://azizanosman.com/kalau-anda-50-tahun-anda-ada-lima-tahun…

1 Nov 2026, 13:01 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Cukai MSME turun 1 mata peratus. RM6,000 setahun — cukup ke? Jawapan ringkas: tidak — tetapi ia bukan sia-sia. Mulai tahun taksiran 2027, kadar cukai syarikat MSME turun satu mata peratus. Penjimatan maksimum kira-kira RM6,000 setahun bagi syarikat yang layak. Angka itu berguna, tetapi ia tidak akan menyelamatkan bisnes yang aliran tunainya bocor RM20,000 sebulan. Saya tulis ini bukan untuk merendahkan pengumuman it…

1 Nov 2026, 09:30 UTC944 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Apa yang semakin saya hargai menjelang usia “25” ini? Hari ini, 1 November. Bila melihat semula perjalanan sepanjang Oktober, saya bersyukur atas pertemuan, pelajaran dan permulaan baharu yang menjadikan bulan itu begitu bermakna. November sentiasa membawa perasaan yang bercampur buat saya. Pada 4 November ini, genap 16 tahun ayah meninggalkan kami. Sampai sekarang, apabila sesuatu yang baik berlaku, ada waktunya …

Showing the 12 most recent of 203 posts we hold for @AzizanOsmanOfficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @AzizanOsmanOfficial as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
4 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
12 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Fahdi Ghazali
@fahdighazali · 21,963
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 1 October 2026
Dr Samhan (Official)
@drsamhan · 149,260
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 August 2026
Ask Dr Adam Financial Tips
@dradamzubir · 53,417
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 August 2026
Abbasy Official™
@abbasy_malaysia · 19,239
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 October 2026
Neelofa
@NeelofaTelegram · 199,828
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 13 August 2026
Nota Parenting Taufiq Razif
@NotaTaufiqRazif · 155,570
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 August 2026
1 Hari 1 Hadis
@hadisharian_ikram · 108,707
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Azizan Osman (Official)” (@AzizanOsmanOfficial), 39,338 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AzizanOsmanOfficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.