Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 30% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 44 days, net -89. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,758–8,873 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 01:56
8,771
-16
14 Sept 2026, 12:37
8,787
+2
11 Sept 2026, 03:41
8,785
-7
6 Sept 2026, 12:37
8,792
-17
2 Sept 2026, 04:05
8,809
-4
30 Aug 2026, 05:13
8,813
-3
27 Aug 2026, 11:24
8,816
-2
24 Aug 2026, 17:48
8,818
-16
21 Aug 2026, 06:34
8,834
-3
18 Aug 2026, 09:14
8,837
-3
15 Aug 2026, 19:56
8,840
-5
12 Aug 2026, 18:33
8,845
-4
9 Aug 2026, 16:01
8,849
-11
6 Aug 2026, 03:00
8,860
no change
5 Aug 2026, 19:27
8,860
first reading
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.3%
avg views ÷ 8,771 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,250
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held
36 (6 July 2026 – 23 August 2026)
Views total
1,250
Reactions total
49
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
10m 06s
Average length
1m 41s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,036 reactions across 36 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
350
33.8%
👎
231
22.3%
❤
183
17.7%
🤣
121
11.7%
💔
50
4.83%
👏
47
4.54%
😢
43
4.15%
👌
9
0.869%
😍
1
0.097%
🙏
1
0.097%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,036 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⭕️◻️معامله با ترامپ
هر امتیاز نفتی که ایران به آمریکا بدهد (حتی بدتر از قرارداد دارسی)، «در ازای رفع تحریم» توجیه اقتصادی دارد.
طبعاً خلاقیت هم میتوان داشت. مثلا تا سقف فلان میلیون بشکه در روز از تاسیسات نفتی جدیدی که خودشان احداث میکنند در میادینی مشخص برای آنها باشد.
به نظر بنده ایران میتواند متحد نظامی روسیه و چین و همزمان متحد اقتصادی آمریکا باشد. این کمهزینهترین راه حل برای عبور از بحران فعلی(و سازگار با…
تو اقتصاد میگن باید هر کشوری تو زمینهای تخصص پیدا کنه که توش مزیت نسبی داره.
با همین مدل، ایرانیان داخل کشور تنها چیزی که دارند و آرزوی ایرانیان خارج از کشور هست همین دورهمیها و رفاقتهاست، وگرنه ایرانیان خارج کشور تو هر چیز مادی و رفاهی به بهترینها دسترسی دارند. پس ایرانیان داخل کشور طبق قاعده مزیت نسبی، باید همین رو تقویت کنند.
⭕️◻️تشدید تحریم و مسکن عشق و محبت
تنها چیزی که میتواند درد سختی اقتصادی پیش رو را برای مردم ایران آسان کند، دورهمیها و هوای همدیگر را داشتن است؛ تزریق مسکن عشق و محبت...
به فتوای من باید تکتک مردم تبدیل به یک «برگزارکننده جشن و دورهمی» شوند و خوراکی و نوشیدنی (البته از نوع حلال😁) پخش کنند؛ هرکس در حد توان خودش!
تنها قانون هم باید این باشد که «هیچ ایرانی با هر عقیدهای ناراحت نشود». اگر مذهبی نیستید، در شادیها…
⭕️◻️مهار کدام مافیا مهمتر است؟
▫️از مافیای قاچاق بنزین قدرتمندتر، مافیای خودرو است.
▫️و از مافیای خودرو قدرتمندتر، مافیای بانکها هستند.
▫️و مشکلاتی که قدرتمندترها ایجاد میکنند ریشهایتر هستند.
یکی از علل اصلی تورم، اضافه برداشت بانکها از بانک مرکزی است که در سال ۱۴۰۴ رکورد زد! این اضافه برداشت رسماً یک دزدی از جیب مردم است(از فقیرترها بیشتر، چون دارایی ندارند).
✔️ اقتصاد رفتاری
@BehavioralEconomicsAndFinanc…
دو هفته پیش (۶ام آگوست) به اعضای کانال باشگاه مالی توصیه کردم که خرید بیتکوین را تکمیل کنند.
الان بعد از دو هفته قیمت بیتکوین به بالای ۷۵ هزار دلار رسیده و احتمالاً بازهم بیشتر رشد خواهد کرد: ۱۷ درصد سود دلاری در فقط دو هفته!
ترامپ داره به یک جای دیگه میزنه(هنوز انقدر خرفت نشده که چیز به این سادگی رو اشتباه کنه)!
میخواد بگه که خود ما شاه رو هم سرنگون کردیم، چون قلدربازی میخواست دربیاره!
این پست یارشار سلطانی در مورد اینکه اجازه غنیسازی اورانیوم در خاک ایران رو حتی به شاه هم ندادند رو ببینید.
برای کنشگری درست باید مسیله را خوب فهمیده باشیم.
@BehavioralEconomicsAndFinance
⭕️◻️لزوم تعیین تکلیف با اسرائیل
پیرو دو پست قبلی، باید گفت واقعیت این است که زمان به نفع ایران نیست.
من حواسم هست که اسباببازی نیروهای سیاسی مختلف (اعم از پوزیسیون و اپوزیسیون و ...) نشوم و باورم این است که همین حکومت اگر روابطش با سایر کشورها و روابطش با مردم را درست کند همه چیز خوب خواهد شد. کسی ممکن است بگوید این اصلاح/تغییر از جمهوری اسلامی ایران بعید است، اما من آن را کاملا ممکن میدانم. قدرتمندان جمهوری اسلا…
⭕️◻️آری! گفتگو با آمریکا کافی نیست، با اسرائیل هم باید گفتگو کرد!
پیرو پست قبلی (اینجا) تو این ویدیو هم این آقا اگرچه به اصل داستان اشاره میکنه، اما راه حلی ارایه نمیکنه.
راه حل، پایان دادن به جنگ با اسرائیل است. اگر فکر میکنید پشت خیمه معاویه هستید بروید و جنگ را تمام کنید، و اگر مثل من فکر میکنید این چیزی که آن را به خانه عنکبوت تشبیه کردید جنسش از سنگ خاره هم محکمتر است، بیش از این مردم را تحت فشار نگذارید.
…
اینکه هزینه شادکامی ایرانیان انقدر بالا رفته یکی از خروجیهای جنگ هیبریدی ۴۸ ساله است.
و کسی که نتواند چیزی به این وضوح را ببیند در واقع کور است.
👍12👌1👎1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @BehavioralEconomicsAndFinance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@BehavioralEconomicsAndFinance edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
شبکه توسعه @I_D_Network · 38,829 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 31 August 2026
Hamed Kiani | حامد کیانی @hamed_kianiiii · 39,379 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
Proxy MTProto | ملی @lock_proxy · 28,052 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 September 2026
حمید کثیری @hamidkasiri_ir · 33,930 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 3 September 2026
دکتر شیری @drshiri · 98,287 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
کتابخانه دانشگاهی @Academic_Library · 144,513 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
مدیران ایران | آموزش مدیریت کسب وکار |modiriran 🕊 @modiriran · 34,367 Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اقتصاد رفتاری” (@BehavioralEconomicsAndFinance), 8,771 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BehavioralEconomicsAndFinance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
