Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
85,000 average views per post against 117,486 subscribers — an engagement rate of 72.3%. Across the 1,131 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,135–315,832 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 1.86% and 8.86%, with a median of 4.43%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (24 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Posts measured
12 of 12 published in the window (0 exact, 12 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
1,019,500
Mature posts only
76.5% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 23 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net +746. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 116,400–117,775 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 23:19
117,486
-48
15 Sept 2026, 18:22
117,534
-26
14 Sept 2026, 00:56
117,560
-56
12 Sept 2026, 08:40
117,616
+163
10 Sept 2026, 03:37
117,453
+312
6 Sept 2026, 22:20
117,141
-20
4 Sept 2026, 05:56
117,161
-32
2 Sept 2026, 17:54
117,193
-9
1 Sept 2026, 18:18
117,202
-7
31 Aug 2026, 17:59
117,209
-7
30 Aug 2026, 21:32
117,216
-19
29 Aug 2026, 20:17
117,235
-30
28 Aug 2026, 19:47
117,265
+76
27 Aug 2026, 17:32
117,189
-14
26 Aug 2026, 20:32
117,203
+31
25 Aug 2026, 20:23
117,172
+22
24 Aug 2026, 20:07
117,150
-4
23 Aug 2026, 04:17
117,154
+67
21 Aug 2026, 15:05
117,087
+42
20 Aug 2026, 10:43
117,045
first reading
Engagement
34 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 100 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
72.3%
avg views ÷ 117,486 subscribers
Avg views / post
85,000
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 34 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
34 (5 May 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
1,019,500
Reactions total
47,659
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 21:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
783
Videos
274
Links
230
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
10m 37s
Average length
1m 20s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
132,450 reactions across 34 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
130,819
98.8%
👎
1,631
1.23%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132,450 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
▫️محسنی اژهای: توضیحات وزارت نفت و بانک مرکزی درباره تراستیها قانعکننده نبود
محسنی اژهای، رئیس قوه قضائیه، با اشاره به موضوع «تراستیها» و نحوه بازگشت ارز حاصل از صادرات، بر ضرورت تعیین تکلیف این پرونده تأکید کرد.
او گفت توضیحات ارائهشده از سوی وزارت نفت و بانک مرکزی درباره این موضوع برایش قانعکننده نبوده و بر بررسی دقیق ابعاد پرونده و ادامه پیگیریها برای روشن شدن موضوع تأکید کرد.
رییس قوه قضاییه پرونده …
▫️صحبتهای اقای دستغیب، رییس دیوان محاسبات کشور در صحن علنی مجلس که عین صحبتهای من است.
او از دستهای پشت پرده فروش نفت میگوید.
از مجوزهای خاص و امنیتیسازی فروش نفت!
چرا وزارت نفت از فروش نفت میترسد؟
@yashar_soltani | یاشار سلطانی
جماعتی عادت دارند گنج را در خرابهها مردم پیدا کنند.
سؤال من ساده بود:
ماجرای واگذاری ۸۰ میلیون بشکه نفت به ۴ تریدر چیست؟ این چهار نفر چگونه انتخاب شدند و خط اعتباری با چه مجوزی برایشان ایجاد شد؟
اگر بنا دارید با کجفهمی عمدی از تعبیر «موشک به توافق»، اصل ماجرا را منحرف کنید، از فردا اسناد بیشتری منتشر میکنم تا سوءتفاهمهای ساختگیتان کاملاً برطرف شود.
#پول_نفت_کجاست؟
#نفت_دست_کیست؟
▫️لینک کامل برنامه در …
▫️۱۰۰ میلیون بشکه نفت گم شده!
به قرارگاهها، ستاد کل، نیروی انتظامی و نیروهای مسلح چه ارتباطی دارد که نفت میفروشد؟
چرا متولی فروش نفت باید امنیتیها و اطلاعاتیها باشند؟
[ لینک ویدیو در یوتیوب ]
@yashar_soltani | یاشار سلطانی
نفت در ایران صاحب ندارد؟
▫️محمد جواد #باوند معاون سابق اقتصادی اطلاعات سپاه الان مسئول فروش نفت شده است.
او به ۴ نفر ۸۵ میلیون بشکه نفت واگذار کرد که سود ۱/۵ میلیاردی نصیبشان شد.
یکی از آنها روح الله رضوی داماد سخنگوی پایداریها که ۱۷ میلیارد دلار نفت فروخت.
و دیگری پسر شمخانی که طی این سالها ۳۰ میلیارد دلار نفت فروخته است.
▫️درباره بایندریان و مومنین هم بعدا مینویسم.
[ لینک ویدیو در یوتیوب ]
@yashar_soltan…
مصدق صنعت نفت را ملی کرد؛ اما همان نفت الان دست چند جوجهاطلاعاتی و امنیتی افتاده است.
کارگروه نفت شورای عالی امنیت ملی چرا و چگونه تشکیل شد؟
اعضا بیمسئولیت آن چه کسانی بودند؟
[ لینک ویدیو در یوتیوب ]
@yashar_soltani | یاشار سلطانی
▫️فساد در نفت؛ نقش امنیتیها چیست؟
نفت ایران سالهاست زیر تحریم فروخته میشود؛ با واسطه، تراستی، تریدر و شبکههای پنهان انتقال پول.
اما سؤال اصلی این نیست که نفت چطور فروخته میشود؛ سؤال این است که چه کسی تصمیم میگیرد، چه کسی تأیید میکند و وقتی پول برنمیگردد، چه کسی پاسخگوست؟
در این برنامه میخواهیم درباره فساد در نفت و نقش #نهادهای_امنیتی در این ساختار حرف بزنیم.
[ لینک ویدیو در یوتیوب ]
@yashar_soltani | ی…
▫️کیفرخواست فساد در فوتبال
در پرونده #فساد_فوتبال، برای تعدادی از مدیران ارشد و چهرههای فدراسیون فوتبال به اتهام #اختلاس کیفرخواست صادر شده است.
▫️مهدی تاج
▫️محمدمهدی نبی
▫️احسان اصولیصفا
▫️تهمورث حیدری
▫️خداداد افشاریان
▫️محمدرضا ساکت
بر اساس قانون با صدور کیفرخواست همگی این افراد از حضور در فدراسیون منع و از کار منفصل میشوند.
این فقط یک پرونده درباره چند مدیر فوتبالی نیست؛ پای ساختاری در میان است …
▫️چرا تصمیمگیری در کشور اینقدر پیچیده است و در نهایت هم معلوم نیست مسئول تصمیم چه کسی است؟
با وجود همه فشارها و سختیها، تصمیم دارم سری جدید برنامه «راه دیگر» را بسازم و منتشر کنم.
اما پیش از آن، این بخش از سری اول را دوباره ببینید؛ برنامهای که پیش از جنگ منتشر شد.
آن زمان گفتم: قدرت تصمیمگیری در کشور باید واحد و مسئولیتپذیر باشد. نمیشود کشوری را با مراکز متعدد قدرت، تصمیمگیران موازی و مسئولیتهای مبهم ادار…
پرونده هادی
مستندات متعددی درباره فساد، تخلفات و نحوه مدیریت #هادی_ساعی در فدراسیون تکواندو به دستم رسیده که برخی از آنها واقعا شگفتآور است.
یک سؤال مهم از وزارت ورزش:
آیا از عدم تأیید صلاحیت هادی ساعی مطلع بودید و با این حال، اجازه دادید دوباره رئیس فدراسیون تکواندو شود؟
بعد از رسیدگی به پرونده تراستیها و تریدرهای نفت، درباره آنچه در فدراسیون تکواندو گذشته را مستند و مفصل خواهم نوشت.
@yashar_soltani |…
👍4,410👎29
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @yashar_soltani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@yashar_soltani edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
22 September 2026
Most recent edit
22 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال شخصی یاشار سلطانی” (@yashar_soltani), 117,486 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yashar_soltani.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.