Channel
@yashar_soltani
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
123,321subscribers
+6,581 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001419337210 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yashar_soltani |
| Description | روزنامهنگار تحقیقی و مشاور رسانه ارتباط با من و ارسال گزارش @yasharsoltani_126 https://twitter.com/yasharsoltani |
| Created | 23 October 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yashar_soltani |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
106,000 average views per post against 123,416 subscribers — an engagement rate of 85.8%. Across the 1,134 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,071–316,044 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 1.83% and 8.77%, with a median of 4.23%.
| Window | 30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 14 of 14 published in the window (0 exact, 14 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 1,482,000 |
| Mature posts only | 85.8% over 14 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 123,416 measured 4 November 2026 |
| Cohort | b100000:fas · 1,134 channels · p10 0.793% · p25 1.83% · p50 4.23% · p75 8.77% · p90 17.1% |
| Position in cohort | 99.823th percentile · 20.3× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.055% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Persian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 20:44 | 123,321 | -27 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 14:20 | 123,348 | -20 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 11:45 | 123,368 | -22 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 14:18 | 123,390 | -26 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:10 | 123,416 | -15 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:31 | 123,431 | -23 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:57 | 123,454 | -35 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:44 | 123,489 | -31 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:29 | 123,520 | -33 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:59 | 123,553 | +2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 07:56 | 123,551 | -30 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 08:40 | 123,581 | -7 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 12:06 | 123,588 | +7 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:49 | 123,581 | +91 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 123,490 | -33 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:47 | 123,523 | +42 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:27 | 123,481 | +43 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:47 | 123,438 | +96 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 06:50 | 123,342 | +29 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:07 | 123,313 | first reading |
53 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 192 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 53 (5 May 2026 – 29 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,026,400 |
| Reactions total | 40,155 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 04:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
223,771 reactions across 53 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 212,328 | 94.9% | |
| 👎 | 11,443 | 5.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 223,771 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 29 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (60.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
ماجرای امتیاز نفت ایران در چین که پسر شمخانی با آن نفت روسیه و ونزوئلا را فروخت چیست؟ چگونه برای منطقه شاندونگ چین انحصار ایجاد کردند و نفتکش رقبا لو رفت و تحریم شدند؟ @yashar_soltani | یاشار سلطانی
👍2,420👎7
▫️احمددنیامالی با وجود سابقه محکومیت قطعی زندان چگونه وزیر ورزش شد؟ دنیامالی هنگام عضویت در شورای شهر تهران، بهعنوان رئیس هیئتمدیره و سهامدار شرکت «کریت عمران آریانا»، با شرکت «عمران توسعهگران پیشگامان» وابسته به #بنیاد_تعاون_ارتش قرارداد بست. او بابت «مداخله غیرقانونی در معاملات دولتی»، در دادگاه بدوی به دو سال حبس و ابطال قرارداد محکوم شد. دادگاه تجدیدنظر در اردیبهشت ۱۴۰۲، اصل محکومیت را تأیید و حبس را به هف…
👍3,270👎13
▫️رانت نفتی زیر سایه شعام سالها به نام تحریم و با پوشش محرمانگی و تصمیمات امنیتی، سازوکاری در فروش نفت شکل گرفت که در دل آن رانتهای بزرگ توزیع شد؛ بیآنکه افکار عمومی بداند چه کسی تصمیم گرفته، چه کسی نفت گرفته و چه کسی پاسخگوی پول مردم است. برای این ساختار، تاریکخانههایی ساختند که قرار بود مسیر دور زدن تحریم را پنهان کند؛ اما در عمل، همان تاریکی به حاشیه امنی برای فرار از پرسشگری و پاسخگویی تبدیل شد. حالا وقت ر…
👍2,890👎21
۳۰ میلیارد بشکه نفت را چه کسانی فروختند؟ در قسمت سوم برنامه ایران معمولی، برای دومین بار به موضوع نفت پرداختم. اینکه طی چند سال گذشته؛ چه کسانی بیش از ۳۰ میلیارد بشکه نفت فروختند. هر کدام چقدر سهم داشتند؟ ▫️از حسین شمخانی تا حسین آقایاری ▫️از مجید تاج تا مومنین و رضوی و بدرالدین موسوی از ویلیام چینی که نفتکشهای ۱۵۰ میلیون دلاری را ۱ میلیارد دلار برایمان فاکتور کرد. از ۱۱ میلیارد دلار سهم ما در میدان گازی شاه…
👍3,410👎11
▫️از زندان نرفتن دنیامالی تا حمایت شعام از تاج چرا #دنیا_مالی وزیر ورزش به زندان نمیرود؟ نکنه قرار است مثل موضوع #مهدی_تاج «شورایعالی امنیت ملی» در این مورد هم دخالت کند؟ برای اجرای قانون هم باید مطالبه عمومی شکل بگیره تا آقایون به وظیفهشون عمل کنند؟ @yashar_soltani | یاشار سلطانی
👍3,870👎9
▫️فردا دادگاه مهدی تاج و دیگران برگزار میشود. #مهدی_تاج بهخاطر انتشار خبر کیفرخواست خودش و چند نفر دیگر از من شکایت کرده؛ در حالی که فردا ساعت ۹، جلسه رسیدگی به پرونده او در شعبه ۱۰۵۹ دادگاه کیفری دو برگزار میشود. پیش از تاج، به پرونده #دنیامالی، وزیر ورزش، خواهم پرداخت. به باور من، او صلاحیت اداره وزارت ورزش را ندارد. با شکایت و تهدید، این مسیر متوقف نمیشود؛ فقط مسیر رفتنشان هموار تر میشود. #تاج #فسادفوتبا…
👍5,420👎8
۴۷ سال گذشت؛ با همهٔ سختیها و خوشیهایش. اگر توانستم ادامه بدهم، به پشتوانهٔ همراهی و دعای خیر شما مردم فهیم و نازنین بود. اما دیشب، حرف مادرم حال دیگری داشت: «خیلی خوشحالم که تو را به دنیا آوردم.» ☺️ برای تولدم، چه هدیهای قشنگتر از این؟ @yashar_soltani | یاشار سلطانی
👍10,200👎42
نروژ و کشورهای خلیج فارس با پول نفت، ثروت ملی ساختند؛ ما چه کردیم؟ @yashar_soltani | یاشار سلطانی
👍2,910👎47
سرزمین فرصتهای سوخته؛ جزیرهای به نام ایران @yashar_soltani | یاشار سلطانی
👍3,010👎27
پنج سال زندان به اتهام جاسوسی؛ بعد تبرئه! حکایت شنیدنی از مرتضی خزانهداری در بورس به روایت بهنام صمدی در برنامه «ایران معمولی»؛ مرتضی خزانهداری، مدیرعامل وقت شرکت مدیریت فناوری بورس تهران، ارتباط با شرکت فرانسوی آتوس برای پشتیبانی از سامانه معاملاتی بورس در دوران تحریم، به پرونده جاسوسی علیه او تبدیل شد. او پنج سال زندان را گذراند، سرانجام تبرئه شد و از او حلالیت خواستند. حتما حلالیتخواهی جای ۵ سال زندگی تلف ش…
👍2,550👎20
▫️پس لرزههای افشاگری نفت؛ از تلاش برای بازداشت تا تخریب توسط امنیتیها پرداختن به پروندههای بزرگ و ممنوعه همیشه آسان نیست. پشت هر موضوع، شبکهای از منافع، قدرت و فشار وجود دارد و شکستن این سد قطعا هزینه دارد. اما وقتی پای منافع ملی و ثروت مردم در میان است، این سختی نهتنها قابل تحمل، که لذتبخش است. بعد از انتشار برنامه نفت، فشارها از تلاش برای بازداشت تا تخریب توسط امنیتیها ادامه پیدا کرد؛ اما اگر قرار باشد با…
👍5,170👎19
▫️بورس ایران؛ نیمقرن سابقه، یک دنیا عقبماندگی بورس ایران پیش از تأسیس کشور امارات آغاز به کار کرد؛ اما امروز ارزش کل بازار سرمایه ایران حتی به ارزش یک شرکت نفتی عربستان، یعنی آرامکو، نزدیک نیست. چرا کشوری با این حجم از نفت، گاز، معادن و سرمایه انسانی، نتوانسته جایگاهی متناسب با ظرفیتهایش در بازار سرمایه جهان پیدا کند؟ در این قسمت از «ایران معمولی»، با بهنام صمدی به سراغ بورس ایران رفتهایم؛ از مقایسه با عربستان…
👎7,170👍4,680
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @yashar_soltani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@yashar_soltani edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال شخصی یاشار سلطانی” (@yashar_soltani), 123,321 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yashar_soltani.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.