Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net -794. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,848–37,880 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 09:16
36,967
-146
19 Sept 2026, 00:36
37,113
-54
14 Sept 2026, 21:37
37,167
-46
13 Sept 2026, 09:36
37,213
-37
11 Sept 2026, 14:58
37,250
-29
8 Sept 2026, 23:18
37,279
-22
5 Sept 2026, 14:58
37,301
-31
3 Sept 2026, 12:56
37,332
-24
2 Sept 2026, 05:13
37,356
+15
1 Sept 2026, 04:34
37,341
-1
31 Aug 2026, 01:28
37,342
-30
30 Aug 2026, 03:37
37,372
-20
29 Aug 2026, 05:28
37,392
-7
28 Aug 2026, 07:44
37,399
-8
27 Aug 2026, 06:36
37,407
-38
26 Aug 2026, 03:26
37,445
-21
25 Aug 2026, 04:53
37,466
-21
24 Aug 2026, 03:42
37,487
-16
22 Aug 2026, 13:14
37,503
-32
21 Aug 2026, 07:03
37,535
first reading
Engagement
1,027 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 89 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 36,967 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,740
528 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
534
of 1,027 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 527 of 528 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
1,027 (5 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
3,032,239
Reactions total
47,676
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 02:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈34,200
Videos
≈42,600
Links
≈8,970
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
15h 09m
Average length
2m 44s
Measured directly from 333 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
90,940 reactions across 991 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
36,115
39.7%
🤬
18,817
20.7%
❤
15,181
16.7%
😢
7,341
8.07%
👎
7,340
8.07%
🔥
3,492
3.84%
😁
2,038
2.24%
🙏
616
0.677%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 991 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90,940 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 6 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔵 خطر اجرای حکم اعدام مژده هاشمی بازرگانی؛ نگرانیها درباره روند پرونده افزایش یافت
مژده هاشمی بازرگانی، شهروند ساکن الوند قزوین، که از ۱۵ فروردین ۱۴۰۵ در بازداشت بهسر میبرد، همچنان در زندان مرکزی قزوین نگهداری میشود. بر اساس گزارشهای منتشرشده، پرونده او با اتهاماتی از جمله «توهین به رهبری»، «جاسوسی» و «همکاری با اسرائیل و آمریکا» تشکیل شده است.
گزارشهای پیشین حاکی از آن است که هاشمی بازرگانی در زمان بازداشت و…
🔵 کانال 14 اسرائیل: عربستان سعودی تماموقت مشغول التماس به اسرائیل برای کمک در برابر حوثیهاست.
اما در نهایت هیئت نمایندگیاش هنگام سخنرانی نتانیاهو تو سازمان ملل، جلسه رو ترک میکنه.
سیانان از یک آرایش «آخرالزمانی» پرده برداشت؛ پرواز «هواپیمای روز قیامت»
شبکه خبری سیانان (CNN) دقایقی پیش به نقل از دو مقام ارشد پنتاگون، از یک تغییر آرایش نظامی بیسابقه و بهشدت خطرناک در خاورمیانه خبر داد.
طبق این گزارش اختصاصی، ارتش آمریکا نه تنها بمبافکنهای رادارگریز B-2 Spirit (که تخصص آنها نابودی تأسیسات فوقسری و زیرزمینی است) را به حالت آمادهباش درآورده، بلکه هواپیمای فرماندهی استراتژیک E-4B معروف …
#جنگ_گرگها
«دادگاه خیابانی» در ولنجک؛ تجمع علیه حسن روحانی مقابل منزلش
گروهی از نیروهای حزباللهی مقابل منزل حسن روحانی در خیابان ثارالله ولنجک تجمع کردند و با سر دادن شعارهایی، خواستار محاکمه رئیسجمهور پیشین جمهوری اسلامی شدند. گزارشهای منتشرشده نشان میدهد تجمعکنندگان علاوه بر روحانی، محمدجواد ظریف و محمد خاتمی را نیز هدف شعارهای خود قرار دادهاند.
الجولانی در اولین روز حمله نیروهایش به حلب، با اعزام یک گروه ویژه موفق به ترور فرمانده ارشد نیروهای ایرانی. سردار کیومرث پورهاشمی داخل اتاق امن دفترش در وسط یک پادگان محافظت شده مدافعین حرم شد.
این ترور قطعا روی فروپاشی روحیه مدافعین حرم و آشفتگی و فرار شرم آور آنها از حلب نقش داشت.
🔴 آبادان، اين پسر ۱۶ ساله بنام محمد مهدى سليمانى كه شاكَرد مكانيك است حوالى ساعت ٢١ شب تاریخ ۲۲ شهریور با موتور در حال رفتن به خانه بوده، ماموران كلانترى ١٨ آبادان، بدون هيچ جرمى او را ميكَيرند و پس از ضرب و شتم شديد، موتورش را ميبرند و پيكر زخمى اورا در كنار خيابان رها ميكنند.
تعدادى از مردم كه شاهد جنايت ماموران بودند به كمك محمد مهدى ميايند و او را به اورژانس بيمارستان بهشتى آبادان ميبرند
⚠️ هشدار: تصاویر حاوی صحنههای بسیار دلخراش است.
🔹این تصاویر پیکر شماری از معترضان کشتهشده در جریان اعتراضات دیماه ۴۰۴ را نشان میدهد که توسط پرسنل نیروی انتظامی و اعضای گروهک تروریستی سپاه پاسداران به دستور مستقیم علی خامنهای به شهادت رسیدند.
@mahdavifar2021
🔵 چرا در تجمعات اعتراضی، پرسنل نیروی انتظامی و اعضای گروهک تروریستی سپاه پاسداران، همشهریان و همسایگان خود را به رگبار گلوله میبندند و مادران و پدران را داغدار میکنند و هزاران کودک را یتیم میکنند؟
پاسخ این سوال در ویدئو داده شده است.
@mahdavifar2021
سفیر آمریکا در چین:
چین در مقابل ترامپ تعهد داد که از کمک به ایران دست خواهد کشید.
👍98👎11🔥3❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,027 posts we hold for @mahdavifar2021. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mahdavifar2021 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
4 September 2026
Most recent edit
5 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@mahdavifar2021 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@turkmen_news2 named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
راه نو🖤 @Newwaypolitics · 21,126 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 September 2026
گلچين @bavarh · 77,820 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
ایران آزاد و آباد (مهدی نصیری) @iranazadvaabad · 32,666 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
دلنوشته ها - رحیم قمیشی @ghomeishi3 · 33,776 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
رادیوایران✌️✌️ @Radioiran_plus · 44,709 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 August 2026
آمدنیوز «صــدای آزادی» @Sedaiazadi · 31,233 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
قهرمانان نمی میرند|اعتراضات|اخبار جنگ @Ghahrman_Ir · 28,298 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 9 September 2026
معلمان شاد @moallemshad · 50,344 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
بهرام مشیری @bahrammoshri · 36,201 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 September 2026
حقوق ما @hoghoughma · 22,367 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
ایران بیدار @IRanBidar · 27,172 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 11 September 2026
رادیو گیلان 📡 @Namayandeh3oma · 293,019 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
آزادنیوز 📡 @anzalishahreeshghe · 34,700 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
شبكه كلمه Kalemeh TV Iran @kalemehtv · 48,084 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
AVATODAY @javanmardi77 · 202,895 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
کتاب باز @cotobbaz · 112,207 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 15 August 2026
شبكه رسانهاى بیان @BayanMediaNetwork · 24,396 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
پشت پرده ها @poshtpardeha · 102,591 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
ایمان سلیمانی امیری- IMAN SOLEIMANI AMIRI @Imansoleymaniamiri · 25,565 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
آموزشکده توانا @Tavaana_TavaanaTech · 48,090 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 26 August 2026
مسیح علینژاد @masih_alinejad · 56,208 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
Azadi | آزادی @sepehrazadi · 346,481 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
جنبش دادخواهان و آزادگان @jda_jonbesh · 29,965 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026
کیان ملی 1 @kianmeli1 · 339,550 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 50 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال محمد مهدویفر” (@mahdavifar2021), 36,967 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mahdavifar2021.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.