(ج.د.آ)
جنبشی متشکل از جوانان و فرهیختگان
با نظارت ؛مولانا عبدالغفار نقشبندی
هدف؛ کمک و ساماندهی انقلابی که با خون جوانان بیگناه آغاز و با سرنگونی رژیم ختم میگردد
🔻عضویت در مبارزات 👇🏻
http://t.me/SiyahSawar
گزارشات👇🏻
@jdajonbesh_admin
Created
Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
27 measurements spanning 30 days, net -485. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,987–30,618 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 14:40
30,060
-49
4 Sept 2026, 04:36
30,109
-32
2 Sept 2026, 15:43
30,141
-12
1 Sept 2026, 15:04
30,153
-10
31 Aug 2026, 16:17
30,163
-9
30 Aug 2026, 19:36
30,172
-17
29 Aug 2026, 18:54
30,189
-15
28 Aug 2026, 18:24
30,204
-13
27 Aug 2026, 17:38
30,217
-23
26 Aug 2026, 17:22
30,240
-12
25 Aug 2026, 16:57
30,252
-20
24 Aug 2026, 18:07
30,272
-27
23 Aug 2026, 04:07
30,299
-16
21 Aug 2026, 15:18
30,315
-5
20 Aug 2026, 14:34
30,320
-14
19 Aug 2026, 16:18
30,334
-18
18 Aug 2026, 17:42
30,352
-14
17 Aug 2026, 14:38
30,366
-12
16 Aug 2026, 08:55
30,378
-34
14 Aug 2026, 19:44
30,412
first reading
Engagement
90 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.5%
avg views ÷ 30,060 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,350
63 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
63
of 90 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 62 of 63 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held
90 (21 July 2026 – 6 September 2026)
Views total
274,230
Reactions total
3,219
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Sept 2026, 01:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,320
Videos
≈3,270
Links
≈4,840
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
55m 32s
Average length
1m 55s
Measured directly from 29 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,055 reactions across 88 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,906
57.5%
🔥
594
11.8%
👍
413
8.17%
❤🔥
405
8.01%
👏
401
7.93%
😁
188
3.72%
💯
74
1.46%
🙏
48
0.95%
🥰
26
0.514%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 88 of the 90 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,055 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 90 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
وحشت و استیصال رژیم تروریستی ولایت فقیه از خشم ملت بلوچ؛ تداوم گسیل تجهیزات سنگین زرهی و تانک به سمت چابهار برای سرکوب و میلیتاریزه کردن منطقه
به گزارش #جنبش_جدا/ رژیم تروریستی، اشغالگر و سرکوبگر حاکم، از ترس قیام و خشم متراکم ملت بلوچ و برای مقابله با مردمی که پیشتر سرپناهشان را با لودر خراب کرده و سفرههایشان را لگدمال کرده بود، در حال تبدیل کردن جنوب بلوچستان به یک پادگان بزرگ نظامی است. امروز یکشنبه ۱۵ شهریورما…
شکستهای پیدرپی رژیم تروریستی و اشغالگر ولایت فقیه در برابر آمریکا؛ رژیم بزدل حاکم عقده ناتوانی خود را بر سر ملت بیدفاع بلوچ خالی میکند
به گزارش #جنبش_جدا/ در ادامه سیاستهای خصمانه و ویرانگر علیه ملت بلوچ، غروب روز گذشته شنبه ۱۴ شهریورماه ۱۴۰۵، نیروهای اوباش شهرداری رژیم در اقدامی وحشیانه و بدون هیچگونه اخطار یا اطلاعرسانی قبلی، یک منزل مسکونی را در خیابان فردوسی (روبهروی کوچه ۳۹) شهرستان ایرانشهر مستقیماً هد…
هجوم وحشیانه مزدوران شهرداری به معیشت دستفروشان بلوچ در ایرانشهر؛ لگدمال کردن نان مردم و درگیری غیورانه شهروندان با سرکوبگران
به گزارش #جنبش_جدا/ در تداوم سیاستهای فاشیستی و تضعیف عمدی معیشت ملت بلوچ، روز چهارشنبه ۱۱ شهریور ماه ۱۴۰۵، دهها تن از نیروهای اوباش و مزدوران شهرداری رژیم در یک یورش وحشیانه، به بساط دستفروشان مظلوم در خیابان یادگاری (نبش خیابان مکران، نزدیک فلکه مادر) در شهرستان ایرانشهر حملهور شدند. این…
شبیخون وحشیانه نیروهای نظامی اوباش و تروریستی به حریم خانههای مردم چابهار؛ تخریب شبانه منازل و شکنجه زنان و کودکان بلوچ با شوکر برقی!
به گزارش #جنبش_جدا/ در تداوم سیاستهای فاشیستی و آپارتاید نژادی رژیم سرکوبگر حاکم، بامداد پنجشنبه ۱۲ شهریور ماه ۱۴۰۵، حقوقبگیران و مزدوران بنیاد مسکن با همراهی نیروهای نظامی اوباش و تروریستی، در یک شبیخون بزدلانه و تحت تاریکی شب، با ماشینآلات سنگین به منطقهای مسکونی در شهرستان چاب…
موشکباران و تهاجم پهپادی رژیم سفاک ولایت فقیه به عروسی خونین کوهستک؛ انتقام سخت از مردم مظلوم بلوچستان به جای آمریکا!
به گزارش #جنبش_جدا/ابعاد هولناک و تکاندهنده فاجعه شامگاه سهشنبه ۱۰ شهریورماه ۱۴۰۵ در بندر کوهستک سیریک، پرده از یک جنایت بیرحمانه و سناریوی کثیف امنیتی توسط رژیم اشغالگر ولایت فقیه برمیدارد. آخوندهای خونریز حاکم بر تهران که در برابر ارتش آمریکا عاجز و ناتوان هستند و جرئت رویارویی با دشمنان خود …
حمله موشکی در کوهستک سیریک؛ شب شادی مردم بلوچ در آتش ماجراجوییهای رژیم ولایت فقیه به خون نشست
به گزارش #جنبش_جدا/ شامگاه سهشنبه ۱۰ شهریورماه ۱۴۰۵، بار دیگر دستهای آلوده به خون و سیاستهای ویرانگر رژیم ولایت فقیه، فاجعهای خونبار را بر ملت مظلوم جنوب بلوچستان تحمیل کرد. اصابت یک موشک به منطقه مسکونی بندر کوهستک در شهرستان سیریک و برخورد ترکشهای آن به یک مراسم عروسی، شبِ شادی مردم را به خاک و خون کشید. در این جنا…
❤39👍15🔥5😁4
Showing the 12 most recent of 90 posts we hold for @jda_jonbesh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کانال رسمی شیخ الاسلام مولانا عبدالحمید @molanaabdolhamid · 48,960 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
HAALVSH | حال وش @haalvsh · 66,084 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
ندای بلوچ @Nedaeybaloch · 73,235 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 August 2026
Zahedaniha | زاهدانی ها @zahedanihaa · 50,855 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
شبكه كلمه Kalemeh TV Iran @kalemehtv · 48,358 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
نمبر وان بلوچNWB @nambaronebalouch · 35,171 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“جنبش دادخواهان و آزادگان” (@jda_jonbesh), 30,060 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jda_jonbesh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.