🚨🚨اخبار جنگ را در #عصرهامون دنبال کنید 🔽🔽🔽🔽🔽🔽🔽 ارتباط با ما ✉️ @Asrehamoon_admin 🆔 https://takl.ink/asrehamoon_sb

Channel
عصرهامون
@asrehamoon_sb
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,804subscribers
+3,636 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001006452571 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @asrehamoon_sb |
| Description | "عصرهامون" رسانه ای به وسعت سیستان و بلوچستان 🔗 ارتباط باادمين: 🆔 @Asrehamoon_admin |
| Created | 24 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/asrehamoon_sb |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 20:26 | 10,804 | +121 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 15:36 | 10,683 | +854 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:37 | 9,829 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 16:55 | 9,832 | +1,953 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 17:49 | 7,879 | +1,014 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 03:47 | 6,865 | -6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:29 | 6,871 | -5 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 20:20 | 6,876 | -2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 02:51 | 6,878 | +8 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 13:41 | 6,870 | +7 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 20:58 | 6,863 | +84 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 6,779 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 6,780 | -22 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:09 | 6,802 | -50 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 6,852 | -112 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:59 | 6,964 | -10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 6,974 | -12 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:25 | 6,986 | -151 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 7,137 | -10 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 7,147 | first reading |
Engagement
370 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.23%
- avg views ÷ 10,804 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 781
- 196 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.205%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 196
- of 370 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 164 of 196 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 370 (5 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 153,152 |
| Reactions total | 260 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 21:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈67,400
- Videos
- ≈20,000
- Links
- ≈87,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2h 23m
- Average length
- 1m 29s
Measured directly from 97 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
437 reactions across 222 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 247 | 56.5% | |
| 🤔 | 39 | 8.92% | |
| 👏 | 32 | 7.32% | |
| 😢 | 28 | 6.41% | |
| 🤩 | 24 | 5.49% | |
| 🥱 | 21 | 4.81% | |
| 🙏 | 16 | 3.66% | |
| 😭 | 8 | 1.83% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 1.60% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 1.14% | |
| 😎 | 4 | 0.915% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.686% | |
| 😐 | 3 | 0.686% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 228 of the 370 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 442 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 370 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 66 of 196 posts held from the last 30 days (33.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🚨🚨 #غیررسمی | انتشار تصاویری از برخاستن دود از محل اصابت در جزیره قشم 🔽🔽🔽🔽🔽🔽 ارتباط با ما 📩@Asrehamoon_admin 🆔 https://takl.ink/asrehamoon_sb
🚨🚨 در حالی که تاکنون هیچ خبر رسمی در خصوص اصابت موشک منتشر نشده، گزارشهای فضای مجازی از بمباران گسترده در مناطق جنوبی کشور حکایت دارند. 🔽🔽🔽🔽🔽 ارتباط با ما ✉️@Asrehamoon_admin 🆔 https://takl.ink/asrehamoon_sb
🚨🚨 ایرنا از شنیدهشدن صدای چهار انفجار در جزیره قشم خبر داد بر اساس این گزارش، احتمال اصابت به برخی نقاط جزیره مطرح شده است. 🔽🔽🔽🔽🔽 ارتباط با ما ✉️@Asrehamoon_admin 🆔 https://takl.ink/asrehamoon_sb
😢2
🚨🚨 منابع عربی از وقوع انفجار در منطقه سیریک خبر دادند. 🔽🔽🔽🔽🔽 ارتباط با ما 📩@Asrehamoon_admin 🆔 https://takl.ink/asrehamoon_sb
😢1
🚨🚨 ادعای منابع عربی درباره شنیدهشدن پنج انفجار در حوالی جزیره قشم 🔽🔽🔽🔽🔽 ارتباط با ما 📩@Asrehamoon_admin 🆔 https://takl.ink/asrehamoon_sb
❤1🤔1
‼️‼️ گزارشها از شنیده شدن صدای انفجار در بندر ماهشهر و قشم خبر میدهند ارتباط با ما 🔽🔽🔽🔽🔽🔽 📩 @Asrehamoon_admin 🆔 https://takl.ink/asrehamoon_sb
🤔1
▶️مهمترین رویدادهای امروز سیستانوبلوچستان در یک نگاه 📣در بسته خبری «آخرشب»، مروری کوتاه بر مهمترین تحولات و رویدادهای خبری امروز سیستان و بلوچستان را دنبال کنید. ارتباط با ما 🔽🔽🔽🔽🔽🔽 📩 @Asrehamoon_admin 🆔 https://takl.ink/asrehamoon_sb
❤1
🚨🚨اکنون نوبت کاخ سفید است که انتخاب کند ⚠️پیشنهاد ۲ روزه ما روی میز است وزیر امور خارجه نوشت: رأیدهندگان آمریکایی انتخاب خود را انجام دادهاند. اکنون نوبت کاخ سفید است که انتخاب کند. «پیشنهاد دو روزه» ما روی میز است: مطالبات آن، از جمله پایان جنگ در همه جبههها، را بپذیرید و نتایج آن را ببینید. یا جنگ را انتخاب کنید و شاهد باشید که چگونه رزمندگان هوشیار و ورزیده ما در میدان نبرد، جهنمی از آتش بر سرتان فرو خواهند…
❤1
🔴عاقبت رعایت نکردن قوانین نیروی دریایی سپاه ناکامی گسترده تلاشهای ارتش متجاوز آمریکا برای عبور نفتکشها از مسیرهای غیرمجاز تنگه هرمز؛ انفجار و آتشسوزی سه فروند نفتکش شب گذشته، نیروهای متجاوز آمریکایی به هدایت برد کوپر، فرمانده قاچاقچیان آمریکایی، با بهکارگیری انواع هواگردهای نظامی و انجام اقدامات گسترده، تلاش کردند تعدادی از شناورها را برخلاف مقررات ابلاغی جمهوری اسلامی ایران، از مسیرهای غیرمجاز تنگه راهبردی هرم…
❤1
🔗سفره مردم سراوان زیر سایه نان بیکیفیت ♦️کیفیت نامطلوب نان و آرد، در کنار صفهای طولانی نانواییها، به مطالبه جدی شهروندان سراوان تبدیل شده است؛ مشکلاتی که باوجود بازدیدهای مکرر مسئولان، همچنان پابرجاست و ضرورت نظارت مؤثر بر زنجیره تولید و عرضه نان را دوچندان میکند. ♦️انتظار میرود مسئولان با کنترل استانداردهای تولید و انجام آزمایشهای کیفی، منشأ مشکلات احتمالی را شناسایی کنند؛ چراکه کیفیت مطلوب نان، از آرد استان…
❤2
🔗ضرورت شتاببخشی به توسعه ایرانشهر آیتالله مصطفی محامی نماینده مقام معظم رهبری در سیستان و بلوچستان با تأکید بر ضرورت تسریع در روند توسعه و خدمترسانی به مردم ایرانشهر، خواستار تلاش مضاعف و جهادی مسئولان برای رفع کاستیها، پیگیری جدی مطالبات مردم و تقویت وحدت و همدلی میان شیعه و اهلسنت شد. در کنار بیان دستاوردها و نقاط قوت، باید کاستیها و مشکلات نیز بهتناسب مطرح شوند تا تصویر دقیقتری از وضعیت موجود به مخاطبان …
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 370 posts we hold for @asrehamoon_sb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@gandomkhabar_sb · 26,072
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 September 2026
@zahedanihaa · 50,254
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
@rasadbalochistan · 23,907
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
@jda_jonbesh · 30,102
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026
@molanaabdolhamid · 48,846
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
@asre_majles · 17,575
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“عصرهامون” (@asrehamoon_sb), 10,804 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asrehamoon_sb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.