Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for سهاب ❖

Channel

سهاب ❖

@SahabBalochistan

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,411subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001306181442
TypeChannel
Username@SahabBalochistan
Description☑️سهاب نام اختصاری: سازمان هماهنگی اعتراضات بلوچستان ☑️این کانال بخش اطلاع رسانی سهاب است، مبارزات واقعی در میدان اند. ☑️با ما ارتباط بگیرید: ادمین ها: @hbbalouch
Created1 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/SahabBalochistan

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,3796,4216,4006 August 2026 — 6,402 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,403 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,395 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,396 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,392 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,390 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,385 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,379 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,382 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,391 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,386 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,393 subscribers27 September 2026 — 6,387 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,398 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,408 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,421 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,417 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,412 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,406 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,405 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,413 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,411 subscribers6,4116 August 20265 November 2026
22 measurements spanning 91 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,373–6,427 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 16:366,411-2
2 Nov 2026, 06:266,413+8
30 Oct 2026, 06:416,405-1
27 Oct 2026, 16:496,406-6
24 Oct 2026, 21:516,412-5
21 Oct 2026, 15:176,417-4
15 Oct 2026, 11:286,421+13
12 Oct 2026, 13:056,408+10
5 Oct 2026, 10:576,398+11
27 Sept 2026, 08:166,387-6
14 Sept 2026, 00:216,393+7
10 Sept 2026, 15:406,386-5
5 Sept 2026, 07:376,391+9
1 Sept 2026, 16:446,382+3
29 Aug 2026, 11:176,379-6
26 Aug 2026, 05:536,385-5
23 Aug 2026, 05:386,390-2
19 Aug 2026, 18:536,392-4
16 Aug 2026, 20:076,396+1
10 Aug 2026, 03:016,395first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.2%
avg views ÷ 6,411 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,100
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.343%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held43 (2 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total13,200
Reactions total36
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 10:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈31,800
Videos
≈14,000
Links
≈25,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
27m 18s
Average length
3m 02s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

130 reactions across 32 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6247.7%
💔3325.4%
🔥1410.8%
💯129.23%
⚡53.85%
🙏43.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 16:14 UTC246 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026

*_جی بلوچان اتپاک!_ (با ترجمه فارسی)* میر گل خان نصیر اے شمئے درماندگی ، اے گشنگی ، اے احتیاج اے گرانیں سُنگ و مالی ، اے سر و مال ءِ ھراج است همے کُلّیں بلاهانی ، بزاں یکیں هَلاج *جی بلوچاں اتپاک ! او تھارمہ روچاں اتپاک* * اے زیاں کاریں حکومت ، اے پل ولٹ وگھزب اے ریا کاریں هَدالت ، جرگه و بجار و لب دراه شمئے نابودی و بے اتپاکی ءِ سبب *جی بلوچاں اتپاک ! او تھارمہ روچاں اتپاک* * اے شمئے اِلم ءَ چہ کوری، اے شمئے …

💯1

6 Nov 2026, 16:14 UTC259 viewsread 7 November 2026

*بند ۶* * *متن بلوچی:* اے په زاهر گندگ ءَ کوه و جبل زاریں وتن جی بلوچاں! گر بزانت اے شمئے گاریں وتن یک گرانیں دولتے بیت، اے شمئے واریں وتن جی بلوچاں اتپاک ! او تھارمہ روچاں اتپاک * *ترجمه فارسی:* این وطن که در ظاهر، کوهستان و دیاری بی رونق به نظر می‌رسد؛ ای بلوچ‌ها! اگر بدانید، این سرزمینِ رنج‌دیده و فراموش‌شده‌تان، اگر متحد گردید ثروتی بس عظیم خواهد شد؛ همین سرزمینِ بظاهر تهیدست و سختی‌کشیده‌تان! *ای…

29 Oct 2026, 16:36 UTC967 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026

موضوع: شکست جمھوری اسلامی ایران در بلوچستان مجری؛ دکتر غلامرضا حسینبر مھمانان؛ آقای علی سلیمانی فعال سیاسی آزربایجان مُھیم بلوچ-سرخوش دبیر کل حزب بلوچستانء راجی تپاکی پخش از تلویزیون کانال یک شھرام ھمایون https://www.youtube.com/live/dYpQtu5SRG8?is=alPwkSeZ5SVW1Mta @partybns @sahabbalochistam

👍2💔2

22 Oct 2026, 22:00 UTC≈1,450 views13 reactionsread 7 November 2026

🔹کشور بلوچستان توسط انگلیس از بین رفت و بخش غربی آن به اشغال قاجاریه در آمد و مرزهای کنونی ایران شکل گرفتند. اما اگر بلوچستان کشور خود را میداشت چه وضعیتی داشت؟! روزی را تصور کنید که مردم بلوچستان با افتخار پاسپورت خود را در دست دارند، سندی که نشان از هویت، استقلال و آزادی آنها داشته باشد. آن وقت دیگر برای سفر به کشورهای جهان نیازی به درخواست ویزا ندارند، چرا که پاسپورت بلوچستان به بیش از ۱۵۰ کشور اجازه ورود بدون وی…

💔8👍4💯1

17 Oct 2026, 17:28 UTC≈1,240 viewsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @hamdelinbanokanVideo

Video, posted without a caption

17 Oct 2026, 17:28 UTC≈1,660 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @hamdelinbanokan

کودک یتیم بلوچ، شناسنامه می‌خواهد تا به مدرسه برود؛ وقتی دولت هم در برابر حق او سکوت می‌کند! نادر، کودک بلوچ که پدرش را از دست داده، تنها یک آرزو دارد: شناسنامه بگیرد و به مدرسه برود. اما با وجود داشتن شناسنامه پدر و مادرش، سال‌ها پیگیری خانواده برای صدور شناسنامه او بی‌نتیجه مانده است. نادر به‌جای نشستن پشت نیمکت مدرسه، ناچار است برای کمک به تأمین هزینه‌های زندگی خانواده کار کند. این داستان بسیاری از کودکان و خانو…

💔5

10 Oct 2026, 14:50 UTC≈1,860 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @Partybns

چابهار و سواحل مکران ملک حکومت‌ها نیست؛ واگذاری زمین، غارت منابع و حقوق ملت بلوچ نویسنده: مُهیم بلوچ ـ سرخوش ۱۰ اکتوبر ۲۰۲۶ بخش ۳ از ۳ عدم مشارکت ملت بلوچ، هنگامی مبنای حقوقی قوی‌تری برای اعتراض می‌شود که با نقض یک تعهد مشخص همراه باشد: مانند نقض حقوق زمین، محرومیت از معیشت، تبعیض، تخلیه اجباری یا نادیده‌گرفتن الزامات قابل اعمالِ مشورت و رضایت. چنین تخلفاتی می‌توانند مبنای مطالبه توقف اقدام زیان‌بار، بازگرداندن زمین…

👍5

10 Oct 2026, 14:50 UTC≈1,250 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @Partybns

چابهار و سواحل مکران ملک حکومت‌ها نیست؛ واگذاری زمین، غارت منابع و حقوق ملت بلوچ نویسنده: مُهیم بلوچ ـ سرخوش ۱۰ اکتوبر ۲۰۲۶ بخش ۲ از ۳ حقوق بین‌الملل؛ حکومت صاحب اختیار نامحدود نیست ماده یک میثاق بین‌المللی حقوق مدنی و سیاسی، حق تعیین سرنوشت مردمان و پیگیری آزادانه توسعه اقتصادی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی آنان را به رسمیت می‌شناسد و محروم‌کردن مردم از وسایل معاششان را منع می‌کند. ایران این میثاق را تصویب کرده است. مواد ۲۵ و…

👍2

10 Oct 2026, 14:50 UTC≈1,330 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @Partybns

در مورد واگذاری زمین به سازمان‌های دولتی، نیمه‌دولتی و خصوصی، اگر در رسیدگی مستقل ثابت شود که واگذاری بر پایه تصرف غیرقانونی، فساد، جعل، فقدان صلاحیت یا نقض حقوق صاحبان زمین انجام شده است، بسته به قانون حاکم می‌توان ابطال واگذاری، بازپس‌گیری زمین و جبران خسارت را مطالبه کرد. وجود سند صادرشده توسط حکومت، به‌خودی‌خود مانع بررسی قانونی منشأ آن نیست. البته صرف ادعای رانت نیز جای اثبات تخلف را نمی‌گیرد. در مورد توافق‌های…

👍2

10 Oct 2026, 14:50 UTC698 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @Partybns

اما این توضیحات، ابهام ناشی از تعبیر اولیه زنگنه درباره داشتن «سرزمین متعلق به خودش» را برطرف نمی‌کند. تا زمانی که متن تفاهم، نقشه اراضی و شرایط بهره‌برداری منتشر نشود، انتقال قطعی مالکیت یا حاکمیت به طالبان اثبات‌شده نیست؛ همان‌گونه که صرف تکذیب مقام‌های حکومت نیز پاسخ کافی به نگرانی ملت بلوچ درباره حقوق زمین، معیشت و مشارکت در تصمیم‌گیری نیست. محمدسعید اربابی، که از دیدگاه من پادوی سپاه است و مسئولیت ظاهری منطقه آز…

👍2

10 Oct 2026, 14:50 UTC≈1,030 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @Partybns

چابهار و سواحل مکران ملک حکومت‌ها نیست؛ واگذاری زمین، غارت منابع و حقوق ملت بلوچ نویسنده: مُهیم بلوچ ـ سرخوش ۱۰ اکتوبر ۲۰۲۶ بخش ۱ از ۳ از دیدگاه من و اکثریت ملت بلوچ جمهوری اسلامی در بلوچستان فاقد مشروعیت مردمی است. مشروعیت با استقرار نیروهای نظامی، کنترل اداری و تحمیل تصمیم‌های مرکز به دست نمی‌آید؛ مشروعیت از اراده آزاد مردم، مشارکت واقعی آنان و احترام به حقوقشان سرچشمه می‌گیرد. سیاست‌های جمهوری اسلامی از آغاز حاکم…

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @SahabBalochistan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

رصد بلوچستان
@rasadbalochistan · 23,913
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
شبكه كلمه Kalemeh TV Iran
@kalemehtv · 47,379
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
HAALVSH | حال وش
@haalvsh · 71,534
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
جنبش دادخواهان و آزادگان
@jda_jonbesh · 30,102
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026
بلوچستانی ها
@balochestaniha1 · 22,956
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 September 2026
کانال رسمی شیخ الاسلام مولانا عبدالحمید
@molanaabdolhamid · 48,868
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
ندای بلوچ
@Nedaeybaloch · 73,513
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 August 2026
💥آیا میدانستید....💥
@AYA_MIDANSTIID1 · 52,497
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 August 2026
Zahedaniha | زاهدانی‌ ها
@zahedanihaa · 50,254
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
گندم خبر (پرس)
@gandomkhabar_sb · 26,078
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 September 2026
Pakeshadintv - پیک شادی
@pakeshadintv · 45,707
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“سهاب ❖” (@SahabBalochistan), 6,411 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SahabBalochistan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.