Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for نیستان5

Channel

نیستان5

@Neyestan5

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,276subscribers

-166 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001091201868
TypeChannel
Username@Neyestan5
Descriptionبشنو ازنی چون حکایت میکند از جدایی ها شکایت میکند کز نیستان تا مرا ببریده اند ازنفیرم مرد وزن نالیده اند. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . https://t.me/Neyestan5
Created20 August 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Neyestan5

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,2729,4439,357.56 August 2026 — 9,442 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,442 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,443 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,436 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,424 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,404 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,399 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,385 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,372 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,367 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,361 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,367 subscribers7 September 2026 — 9,359 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,339 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,335 subscribers27 September 2026 — 9,314 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,293 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,277 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,272 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,285 subscribers23 October 2026 — 9,275 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,279 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,280 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,286 subscribers5 November 2026 — 9,276 subscribers9,2766 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 92 days, net -166. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,246–9,469 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 15:479,276-10
2 Nov 2026, 06:189,286+6
30 Oct 2026, 04:009,280+1
26 Oct 2026, 20:469,279+4
23 Oct 2026, 23:169,275-10
21 Oct 2026, 00:509,285+13
18 Oct 2026, 06:279,272-5
12 Oct 2026, 02:589,277-16
5 Oct 2026, 11:199,293-21
27 Sept 2026, 08:009,314-21
15 Sept 2026, 07:559,335-4
11 Sept 2026, 15:569,339-20
7 Sept 2026, 08:579,359-8
2 Sept 2026, 21:229,367+6
30 Aug 2026, 14:279,361-6
27 Aug 2026, 20:399,367-5
24 Aug 2026, 17:379,372-13
21 Aug 2026, 02:349,385-14
17 Aug 2026, 20:449,399-5
15 Aug 2026, 01:389,404first reading

Engagement

513 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.6%
avg views ÷ 9,276 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
133 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
133
of 513 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 130 of 133 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held513 (5 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total168,249
Reactions total2,661
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 10:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈83,700
Videos
≈55,800
Links
≈10,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4h 00m
Average length
1m 10s

Measured directly from 206 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

11,091 reactions across 484 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💩3,36030.3%
👍2,45022.1%
❤1,74415.7%
🤬8247.43%
😁6575.92%
😢3022.72%
🤣2622.36%
😱2602.34%
😭2292.06%
👎2232.01%
💔2001.80%
👌1901.71%
👏1801.62%
🔥670.604%
🤝540.487%
🙏530.478%
😈130.117%
🥰100.09%
🕊60.054%
🤗40.036%
1 further kind30.027%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 502 of the 513 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,518 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 513 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 133 posts held from the last 30 days (4.51%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 09:58 UTC159 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @poshtneystanPhoto

ی پیشگوی فضای مجازی که پیشگویی های قبلیشم درست بوده ۱۰ مهر پیش بینی کرد : جنگ بعدی دقیقا بین ۱۵ تا ۱۸ آبان خواهد بود و بیشترین احتمال هم ۹ صبح ۱۶ آبان(فردا) هست این جنگ ۱۴ روز طول میکشه و جنگ هوایی خواهد بود و آمریکا ورود زمینی به ایران انجام نمیده. ⭐️

😱1

7 Nov 2026, 09:32 UTC309 views8 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

قدیری ابیانه: برخی مأموران مبارزه با قاچاق سوخت، بعد از پایان ساعت کاری خودشان قاچاقچی می‌شوند! مسئول مبارزه با قاچاق سوخت در سیستان و بلوچستان می‌گفت کارکنان مبارزه با قاچاق سوخت بعد از ساعت اداری می‌روند قاچاق سوخت انجام می‌دهند .

💩6😁2

7 Nov 2026, 08:31 UTC548 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

اتاق جنگ اسرائیل: ایران بالاترین سطح هشدارهای تخلیه و پراکندگی رو برای نیروهای مستقر تو استان‌های جنوبی کشور صادر کرد. .

👍5

7 Nov 2026, 08:00 UTC605 views12 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @poshtneystanVideo

شاید باور نکنید ولی؛ «مانوک خدابخشیان»در سال ۱۳۹۸ حتی باختن حزب جمهوری خواه و ترامپ رو در کنگره رو هم پیش بینی کرده بود و میگفت به خاطر زنده بودن دموکراسی به حزب مخالف رای میدن ولی تاثیری‌ توی سیاست های ترامپ نخواهد داشت. سال ۲۰۱۴ هم که اوباما رئیس جمهور بود؛ مردم به حزب مخالف یعنی جمهوری خواه رای دادن و دقیقا همین شکست ترامپ برای اوباما اتفاق افتاد.

❤11👍1

7 Nov 2026, 07:34 UTC783 views8 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

توییت جدید اتاق جنگ اسرائیل : .

❤8

7 Nov 2026, 07:00 UTC≈1,010 views31 reactionsread 7 November 2026

امروز تغییر مهمی توی کاخ سفید رخ داد! سوزی وایلز از مشاوران ارشد ترامپ که در جنگ ۴۰ روزه ترامپ رو بخاطر هزینه‌های بالای جنگ تحت فشار قرار میداد تا هر چه زودتر جنگ رو متوقف کنه برکنار شد! و به جاش، استیفن میلر از مخالفان سرسخت جمهوری اسلامی که همیشه از تغییر رژیم ایران صحبت کرده، جایگزین شد! .

👍25💩5❤1

7 Nov 2026, 06:31 UTC≈1,010 views17 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

واقعا که انسان متحیر می‌شود ، ببینید چه افرادی قدرت را در دست گرفته اند .

💩15❤1😢1

7 Nov 2026, 05:34 UTC820 views17 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @channelnagoftehaPhoto

🔻قبلا ۷ ملیون میدادیم ماشین بخریم که پیاده نریم ، الان ۷ ملیون میدیم کفش بخریم که پیاده بریم… 😢 اینه دستاوردهای قدرت اول جهان

😢16❤1

7 Nov 2026, 05:05 UTC≈1,020 views24 reactionsread 7 November 2026

نوشته بود آدمی که با خشم از زندگیت میره، ممکنه یه روز برگرده؛ اما کسی که با سکوت و لبخند میره، دیگه هیچ‌وقت توی زندگیت پیداش نمیشه. یعنی گاهی لبخند موقع رفتن نشونه‌ی بی‌خیالی نیست؛ نشونه‌ی اینه که آدم تصمیمش رو گرفته و دیگه چیزی برای گفتن یا برگشتن باقی نمیمونه. درسته👍 نادرسته👎 .

👍23❤1

7 Nov 2026, 04:30 UTC≈1,180 views27 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

می‌دانیم علی انصاری چگونه این پول را گرفته، اما جرأت گفتنش را نداریم! میلاد شیراوند، روزنامه‌نگار اقتصادی، می‌گوید علی انصاری از طریق بانک آینده (که به نام خودش بوده) با استقراض از بانک مرکزی وامی نجومی گرفته، با آن مجتمع عظیم ایران‌مال را ساخته و اکنون همان مجتمع را به پنج برابر مبلغ وام به خود بانک مرکزی می‌فروشد. شیراوند می‌داند چه قدرت و شخصی پشت این وام نجومی بوده، اما جرأت بردن نام مجتبی خامنه‌ای را ندارد. او…

💩20😢4❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 513 posts we hold for @Neyestan5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Nov 2026, 21:20 UTCAnonymous Poll238 voters

اگر گفتن حقیقت به ضرر شما تمام شود، معمولاً چه کار می‌کنید؟

  1. زنها:حقیقت را می‌گویم، حتی اگر به ضررم تمام شود.14%
  2. مردها:حقیقت را می‌گویم، حتی اگر به ضررم تمام شود.23%
  3. زنها:حقیقت را می‌گویم، اما همه جزئیات را بیان نمی‌کنم.9%
  4. مردها:حقیقت را می‌گویم، اما همه جزئیات را بیان نمی‌کنم.12%
  5. زنها:بسته به شرایط، گاهی حقیقت را پنهان می‌کنم.8%
  6. مردها:بسته به شرایط، گاهی حقیقت را پنهان می‌کنم.5%
  7. زنها:اگر ضرر زیادی داشته باشد، ترجیح می‌دهم حقیقت را نگویم.4%
  8. مردها:اگر ضرر زیادی داشته باشد، ترجیح می‌دهم حقیقت را نگویم.3%
  9. زنها:پاسخ مشخصی ندارم؛ به موقعیت بستگی دارد.10%
  10. مردها:پاسخ مشخصی ندارم؛ به موقعیت بستگی دارد.12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Nov 2026, 07:02 UTCAnonymous Poll62 voters

اگر گفتن حقیقت به ضرر شما تمام شود، معمولاً چه کار می‌کنید؟

  1. زنها:حقیقت را می‌گویم، حتی اگر به ضررم تمام شود.18%
  2. مردها:حقیقت را می‌گویم، حتی اگر به ضررم تمام شود.23%
  3. زنها:حقیقت را می‌گویم، اما همه جزئیات را بیان نمی‌کنم.8%
  4. مردها:حقیقت را می‌گویم، اما همه جزئیات را بیان نمی‌کنم.10%
  5. زنها:بسته به شرایط، گاهی حقیقت را پنهان می‌کنم.6%
  6. مردها:بسته به شرایط، گاهی حقیقت را پنهان می‌کنم.8%
  7. زنها:اگر ضرر زیادی داشته باشد، ترجیح می‌دهم حقیقت را نگویم.3%
  8. مردها:اگر ضرر زیادی داشته باشد، ترجیح می‌دهم حقیقت را نگویم.6%
  9. زنها:پاسخ مشخصی ندارم؛ به موقعیت بستگی دارد.8%
  10. مردها:پاسخ مشخصی ندارم؛ به موقعیت بستگی دارد.10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTCAnonymous Poll201 voters

اگر شما بخواهید عطر بخرید،چجوری انتخاب می کنید؟

  1. پیشنهاد فروشنده11%
  2. تبلیغات1%
  3. نظر دوستان9%
  4. برند14%
  5. نت‌های عطر14%
  6. تست روی پوست30%
  7. حدس وتجربه13%
  8. اصلا عطر انتخاب نمیکنم،عطرچیه؟13%
  9. برای من همش خریدن5%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 513 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🔥هـخامنش🔥
@hakhamaneshihaa · 28,027
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 9 September 2026
روشنفکران
@Roshanfkrane · 56,859
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
اخبار بدون تعارف✔
@bedun_taarof · 39,851
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 27 August 2026
بهرام مشیری
@bahrammoshri · 35,927
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 September 2026
🏠 جواز ساخت
@javazsakht · 21,372
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 September 2026
signal_plus_1
@signal_plus_1 · 1
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 3 September 2026
Top Persian ✅
@top_p · 43,768
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 28 August 2026
ایمان سلیمانی امیری- IMAN SOLEIMANI AMIRI
@Imansoleymaniamiri · 25,313
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
خبر لحظه ای😷
@akhabare_mohemm · 64,271
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 21 August 2026
کانال محمد مهدوی‌فر
@mahdavifar2021 · 36,415
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
کانال کارانیوز
@karazinews · 78,631
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
کانال رسمی نود در تلگرام
@NavadtvTelegram · 22,059
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نیستان5” (@Neyestan5), 9,276 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Neyestan5.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.