Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🏠 جواز ساخت

Channel

🏠 جواز ساخت

@javazsakht

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,369subscribers

-168 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001071708780
TypeChannel
Username@javazsakht
CreatedBetween 1 October 2016 and 31 July 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/javazsakht

Topic

Real estate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

21,36921,53821,453.55 August 2026 — 21,537 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,537 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,538 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,535 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,536 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,535 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,529 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,527 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,524 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,522 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,520 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,518 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,515 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,512 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,505 subscribers22 August 2026 — 21,499 subscribers23 August 2026 — 21,494 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,490 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,485 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,483 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,482 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,481 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,475 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,470 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,471 subscribers3 September 2026 — 21,468 subscribers5 September 2026 — 21,469 subscribers8 September 2026 — 21,463 subscribers11 September 2026 — 21,460 subscribers13 September 2026 — 21,455 subscribers16 September 2026 — 21,460 subscribers18 September 2026 — 21,459 subscribers1 October 2026 — 21,435 subscribers6 October 2026 — 21,425 subscribers10 October 2026 — 21,419 subscribers13 October 2026 — 21,415 subscribers15 October 2026 — 21,412 subscribers16 October 2026 — 21,413 subscribers17 October 2026 — 21,407 subscribers18 October 2026 — 21,404 subscribers19 October 2026 — 21,400 subscribers20 October 2026 — 21,399 subscribers22 October 2026 — 21,397 subscribers25 October 2026 — 21,395 subscribers27 October 2026 — 21,393 subscribers28 October 2026 — 21,392 subscribers30 October 2026 — 21,386 subscribers30 October 2026 — 21,387 subscribers31 October 2026 — 21,388 subscribers1 November 2026 — 21,386 subscribers2 November 2026 — 21,385 subscribers3 November 2026 — 21,386 subscribers4 November 2026 — 21,382 subscribers5 November 2026 — 21,378 subscribers6 November 2026 — 21,372 subscribers7 November 2026 — 21,369 subscribers5 August 20267 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 94 days, net -168. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,344–21,563 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 20:4121,369-3
6 Nov 2026, 16:4621,372-6
5 Nov 2026, 15:4921,378-4
4 Nov 2026, 17:0821,382-4
3 Nov 2026, 15:2121,386+1
2 Nov 2026, 18:2121,385-1
1 Nov 2026, 21:4721,386-2
31 Oct 2026, 19:5721,388+1
30 Oct 2026, 21:3721,387+1
30 Oct 2026, 00:3421,386-6
28 Oct 2026, 22:2821,392-1
27 Oct 2026, 20:5921,393-2
25 Oct 2026, 20:5921,395-2
22 Oct 2026, 16:5921,397-2
20 Oct 2026, 09:0921,399-1
19 Oct 2026, 06:2021,400-4
18 Oct 2026, 04:5921,404-3
17 Oct 2026, 03:4721,407-6
16 Oct 2026, 04:1121,413+1
15 Oct 2026, 02:0721,412first reading

Engagement

60 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 81 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.8%
avg views ÷ 21,369 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,580
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 60 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held60 (12 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total75,260
Reactions total272
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 14:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 34s
Average length
2m 17s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,015 reactions across 55 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎36335.8%
❤23923.5%
👍18918.6%
😁898.77%
😢888.67%
👏363.55%
🔥80.788%
😍30.296%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,015 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 08:25 UTC≈1,990 viewsread 7 November 2026

👆(۵) ♦️مساله بزرگتر در بافت‌های فرسوده نیز «انحراف منابع و تسهیلات و مشوق‌های ساخت‌وساز به سمت زمین‌های ۹۹ساله بیرون از شهرها» است که باعث شده بافت از «سکه» نزد سرمایه‌گذاران ساختمانی بیفتد. ♦️در عین حال «جذابیت تراکم‌ اضافه در شمال شهر» نیز مزید بر علت است. ♦️از طرفی حجم صدور پروانه‌ساختمانی در بافت فرسوده تهران هم سال گذشته و هم امسال «افت کرده است و این افت برای امسال نزدیک به ۳۰ درصد می باشد. پایان. @Javazsa…

3 Nov 2026, 08:23 UTC≈2,020 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026

👆(۴) از طرفی حتی مهندسان‌ناظر ساختمانی معتقدند، «ریسک پروژه‌های ساختمانی در بافت‌فرسوده با توجه به تاب‌آوری پایین املاک فرسوده هنگام گودبرداری‌های مجاور» به قدری بالا است که باید برای «تشویق به نظارت»، سختی‌کار یا تعرفه بیشتر نیز وضع شود. 🔹بخاطر همین تخفیف اجباری، مهندسان‌ناظر رغبت آنچنانی به نظارت در بافت‌فرسوده ندارند و این همان مساله‌ای است که باعث «ماه‌ها انتظار و تاخیر سازنده برای صدور پروانه» شده است. 👈در وا…

❤3👏1

3 Nov 2026, 08:20 UTC≈1,840 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026

👆(٣) ♦️اما مقامات دولت و شهرداری می‌گویند، تصمیمی که برای بافت‌فرسوده اتخاذ شده است، «زمان انتظار سازنده برای اتصال به مهندس‌ناظر» را کوتاه می‌کند و این باعث «صدور پروانه‌ساختمانی در زمان کم» و در نتیجه «مواجهه کمتر پروژه نوسازی با تورم مصالح‌ساختمانی» می‌شود. ♦️با این حال، از نگاه سازنده‌ها در بافت‌فرسوده، «مساله اصلی» اصلاً این نیست.🤷‍♂ ♦️آنچه در حال حاضر در ارتباط به نظارت ساختمانی، در بافت‌فرسوده مساله بزرگ مح…

👏2

3 Nov 2026, 07:57 UTC≈1,680 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

✳️ آزمایش خاک و بتن ساختمان خود را به ما بسپارید ♦️حفاری دستی،‌ حفاری ماشینی ♦️طراحی و اجرای پایدارسازی گود به روش خرپا، نیلینگ، استرندو...  📱 تماس : 09121483716

3 Nov 2026, 07:56 UTC≈1,650 views8 reactionsread 7 November 2026

👆(٢) ♦️این تصمیم در ظاهر به معنای «آزادسازی بازار خدمات مهندسان‌ناظر» در بافت‌فرسوده تهران است، چون در حال حاضر سازنده‌ها حق انتخاب مهندس‌ساختمان را ندارند و مهندس‌ناظر براساس «سیستم ارجاع‌کار» سازمان نظام مهندسی و سهمیه‌بندی کار نظارت برای مهندسان، به سازنده‌ها معرفی‌ می‌شود. ♦️اسم این سیستم میان سازنده‌ها و مهندسان‌ناظر مطابق نقدهای عباس آخوندی در زمان وزارت او، به «توزیع کوپنی مهندس سر پروژه‌ها» رواج پیدا کرده ا…

❤5👏3

3 Nov 2026, 07:56 UTC≈1,840 views8 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

✅مشوق نوسازی بافت‌فرسوده از جیب مهندسان‌ناظر؟ 👈تصمیم کمیته‌ ۳ نفره برای جنوب تهران چه بوده است؟ ♦️هفته پیش کمیته‌ای ۳ نفره شامل دولت،‌ شهرداری و نظام مهندسی، یک تصمیم برای «بافت‌فرسوده تهران» اتخاذ کرد و اسم آن را «بسته محرک نوسازی خانه‌های قدیمی» گذاشت. اما بین آنچه مصوب شده با «کلید واقعی برای نوسازی بافت‌فرسوده پایتخت» اختلاف‌اساسی وجود دارد و حتی شاید تصمیم این کمیته را بتوان «اقدامی موازی انجماد سرمایه‌گذاری در…

👎5👏3

31 Oct 2026, 18:10 UTC≈3,870 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

✅تصویب نامه هیات وزیران در خصوص قانون الزام به ثبت رسمی معاملات اموال غیرمنقول در مورد اخذ پایانکار واحدی برای هر واحد ساختمان @Javazsakht

❤1👍1

31 Oct 2026, 17:39 UTC≈2,770 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🎙 پشت فرمون بشنو رادیوتملیک | اولین مرجع صوتی تحولات دنیای مِلک 🔸ویژه فعالان و سرمایه‌گذاران🔸 🎧 شماره ششم منتشر شد 🔴وارد بشید و شماره جدید بشنوید: 👇👇👇👇👇 @radiotamlik

❤3👍2

29 Oct 2026, 13:37 UTC≈4,100 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

✅ثبت درخواست پایان کار ساختمان غیرحضوری شد 🔹♦️با رونمایی از خدمات جدید غیرحضوری حوزه شهرسازی در سامانه «شهریار»، ثبت درخواست تشکیل پرونده شهرسازی (پایان کار) غیرحضوری شد. ♦️این سرویس‌های غیر حضوری در سامانه شهریار، شامل ثبت درخواست تشکیل پرونده شهرسازی (پایان کار)، ثبت درخواست تعمیرات غیر اساسی، کارتابل شهروندی و استعلام حریم مترو می‌شود. ♦️سامانه شهریار امکان ثبت اولیه درخواست تشکیل پرونده شهرسازی برای پایان کار …

❤5

21 Oct 2026, 10:35 UTC≈5,380 views6 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

✅بخشنامه ی شورای مرکزی در خصوص سامانه شناسنامه فنی ملکی ساختمان 👈کلیه‌ی سازمان های نظام مهندسی ساختمان استان ها می بایست مالکان را نسبت به ثبت نام در سامانه زیر راهنمایی نمایند. 👇 https://shenasnama.ir @Javazsakht

👍5👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @javazsakht. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 6 posts on @javazsakht as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
11 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
26 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

سازمان نظام مهندسی ساختمان استان تهران
@tceopr · 27,200
#1
تحلیل اقتصادی
@tahlilorg · 1,375
#2
Iranjib | ایران جیب
@iranjib_ir · 134,364
#3
نبض مسکن
@nabzemaskan · 2,534
#4
پایگاه خبری تحلیلی بهشت آنلاین
@behesht_online · 7,096
#5
مطالعات املاک و اسناد
@ketabesabti · 17,284
#6
کارشناسان رسمی ساختمان
@Karshenasan_Sakhteman · 8,929
#7
بولتن اقتصادی
@boltann · 115,239
#8
اقتصادومسکن
@eghtesadvamskan · 10,828
#9
اقتصاد آنلاین
@eghtesadonline · 76,021
#10
گروه مهندسی 2800
@Eng2800 · 62,225
#11
شهرما
@Shahremaa · 5,449
#12
کتاب الکترونیکی کارشناسان رسمی دادگستری
@karshenas1401 · 5,873
#13
نکات کاربردی اسنادواملاک(مهندس سیاری)
@expert23055 · 2,452
#14
نکات کاربردی و مهم کارشناسی
@eatlaatekarshnaci · 16,137
#15
اخبار،طلا،دلار و سکه کارگشا
@seke_kargosha · 118,634
#16
تحلیل کاربردی " هلالات "
@validhelalat · 68,336
#17
مسکن نیوز
@maskannews_com · 5,228
#18
اقتصادنیوز
@Eghtesadnews_com · 82,872
#19
اخبار شورا
@akhbare_shora · 6,674
#20
اخبار فوری و مهم 🔖
@ir_akhbarfouri · 6,270
#21
« بورس و اقتصاد »
@hamian_bourse · 31,958
#22
فرهنگ سرمایه‌گذاری
@farhangesarmayegozari · 4,262
#23
بهروز ملکی
@MalekiBehrooz · 9,921
#24
سالار صفائی
@salarsafaie · 44,160
#25
️تحليل اقتصاد با آيزاك
@isaacfinances · 10,250
#26
✔ کانال صدای مهندس✔
@Sdaye_mohandes · 5,925
#27
اتحادیه صنف مشاوران املاک تهران
@amlaktehran7334 · 3,936
#28
تحلیل بازار املاک تهران
@DanaMelk_Tehran · 4,336
#29
خانه ساز / اخبار و تحلیل بازار مسکن و صنعت ساختمان
@khanehsaz · 1,285
#30
بهتر است بدانیم
@hkarshenas · 2,708
#31
کارشناسان رسمی دادگستری
@Karshenasan_rasmi · 28,648
#32
مخزن الاسناد مهندسی و کارشناسی 📂📚🗂️🔍🕵️‍♂️👷‍♂️
@yahyafakhri · 3,077
#33
گزارش های بازرس سازمان
@bazressazman · 809
#34
مقررات ملی ساختمان
@Building_code · 29,268
#35
اقوال الفلوس
@aghval_alfolos · 5,647
#36
Planner
@Plannerinfo · 5,541
#37
امید سهم 🟠 omidsahm
@Omidsahmm · 2,907
#38
صندوق‌ها از نگاه فاندبیس
@Fundbase_ir · 77,059
#39
رادار مسکن
@MelkRadar · 9,715
#40
نیستان5
@Neyestan5 · 9,276
#41
Golden U
@iii8iii · 8,081
#42
حقوق املاک(مسیّبی نیا)
@hoghoogh_amlaak · 7,212
#43
عمران | بتن ساختمان
@easyconcrete · 3,931
#44
آزمون نظام مهندسی | کارشناسی رسمی
@civil_nezam_azmoon · 46,243
#45
رده | بررسی و مقایسه خدمات مالی
@rade_ir · 5,943
#46
کلینیک اقتصاد - دكتر على سعدوندى
@EconClinic · 16,911
#47
دانستنی حقوقی املاک
@amuzeshe_amlak · 3,898
#48
كانال خبري اتحاديه صنف فروشندگان آهن و فولاد و فلزات شهرستان تهران
@tisuir · 1,284
#49
ره‌آورد | Rahavard
@rahavard365 · 31,362
#50
بورس پول (یوسفی)
@bourse_poll · 42,169
#51
سهامیاب
@sahamyaab · 29,760
#52
فردانامه _حسن کاظم‌زاده
@fardaname · 24,966
#53
بورس ایران با دکتر وحید کشمیری پور
@vahidkeshmirypour · 26,690
#54
کلید
@kelid_ir · 1,946
#55
FOX NEWS
@foxnewcom · 13,747
#56
دانیال زِهتابیان
@SharoCompany · 1,638
#57
دیدگاه آبان
@aban_saham · 5,360
#58
جـــــزوه عمـــــران
@Jozve_Omran · 22,178
#59
وکیل حسن علیزاده
@vakil_hassanalizadeh · 531 (as read 23 September 2026)
#60
کتابخانه کارشناسان
@PDFkarshenasan · 3,939
#61
داود بیگی نژاد (اتحادیه املاک تهران)
@davidbeygi · 7,623
#62
کانال شخصی مهندس حسن فراهانی
@hassanfarahani48 · 15,401
#63
Forex Trade University
@goldforexsignalanalysis · 231
#64
نظام مهندسی ساختمان کردستان
@sazmankurdestan · 5,605
#65
آپشن آکادمی
@option_academy · 10,378
#66
Elliott Waves
@ElliottWavess · 10,009
#67
روزن‌آنلاین
@rozanonline_ir · 1,805 (as read 23 September 2026)
#68
🛑 بورس طلا/ تحلیل بازار/ شهرام یزدانی
@bourse_tala_tahlile_bazar · 1,162
#69
Forex Trade (علی پروین)
@ForexTR · 12,380
#70
🔊آلبوم کَرکَس
@keshehi · 664
#71
جزییات اجرای ساختمان
@costruzion · 3,679
#72
پلتفرم فیبو
@fibo_tahlil · 2,392
#73
Finroad.ir
@FinRoad_option · 2,868
#74
کانون و مرکز کارشناسان رسمی دادگستری
@hcioe · 4,071
#75

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

سازمان نظام مهندسی ساختمان استان تهران
@tceopr · 27,200
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 September 2026
گروه مهندسی 2800
@Eng2800 · 62,225
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
ناظران و مجریان برتر
@Fazee2 · 32,526
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 5 September 2026
مقررات ملی ساختمان
@Building_code · 29,268
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
کارشناسان رسمی دادگستری
@Karshenasan_rasmi · 28,648
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
پایگاه خبری تارود
@tarood_ir · 24,931
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 23 September 2026
کانال مهندسین عمران | سیویل اجرا
@civilejra · 85,441
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
آزمون نظام مهندسی | کارشناسی رسمی
@civil_nezam_azmoon · 46,243
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
جـــــزوه عمـــــران
@Jozve_Omran · 22,178
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 September 2026
کتابخانه دانشگاهی
@Academic_Library · 144,496
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🏠 جواز ساخت” (@javazsakht), 21,369 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/javazsakht.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.