Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for بهروز ملکی

Channel

بهروز ملکی

@MalekiBehrooz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,026subscribers

-83 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001538376715
TypeChannel
Username@MalekiBehrooz
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/MalekiBehrooz

Growth

10,02510,10910,0676 August 2026 — 10,109 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,106 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,104 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,100 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,094 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,092 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,091 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,086 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,084 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,077 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,076 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,071 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,065 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,063 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,060 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,058 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,056 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,055 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,049 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,034 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,032 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,031 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,025 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,026 subscribers10,0266 August 20265 September 2026
24 measurements spanning 30 days, net -83. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,012–10,122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 11:0210,026+1
3 Sept 2026, 12:3710,025-6
2 Sept 2026, 08:2310,031-1
1 Sept 2026, 08:1510,032-2
31 Aug 2026, 04:5410,034-15
30 Aug 2026, 01:2810,049-6
29 Aug 2026, 01:4210,055-1
28 Aug 2026, 02:0810,056-2
27 Aug 2026, 03:4210,058-2
26 Aug 2026, 04:3210,060-3
25 Aug 2026, 04:0210,063-2
23 Aug 2026, 23:0610,065-6
22 Aug 2026, 09:4410,071-5
18 Aug 2026, 22:5810,076-1
17 Aug 2026, 20:1610,077-7
16 Aug 2026, 20:5510,084-2
15 Aug 2026, 13:1610,086-5
14 Aug 2026, 01:4810,091-1
12 Aug 2026, 20:1510,092-2
11 Aug 2026, 17:0610,094first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 29 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.3%
avg views ÷ 10,026 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,240
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held21 (29 November 202528 August 2026)
Views total2,240
Reactions total27
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,155 reactions across 21 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,08093.5%
👎756.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,155 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 29 November 2025 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC≈2,240 views27 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

خبرگان سرمایه‌گذاری پیشنهاد کرده اند پرتفوی شامل ۳۲ درصد طلا و ۳۲ درصد سهام باشد. رمز ارز با ۴ درصد، کمترین وزن سبد سرمایه‌گذاری را دارد. @MalekiBehrooz

👍27

2 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC≈6,890 views151 reactionsread 29 August 2026

با مطلب شما موافقم. به گمان من نیز نقد، آدابی دارد و اخلاقی. هرگاه این آداب فروبپاشد، در کنار نقد، تخریب، تسویه‌حساب و هیاهوی رسانه‌ای نیز مجال بروز می‌یابد. نمونه اخیر آن، ماجرای عبدالکریم سروش است. فارغ از موافقت یا مخالفت با آرای او، مسئله «نقد» نیست؛ مسئله آنجاست که در کنار نقد، برچسب‌زنی، شخصیت‌پردازی و روایت‌های اثبات‌نشده نیز به میدان آورده شوند. در همین راستا، روایتی درباره سوغاتی‌های سفر ژاپن ــ که به تصریح

👍120👎31

2 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC≈6,030 views58 reactionsread 29 August 2026

👆مطلب منتشره توسط خانم دکتر زارعیان با عنوان "شریعتی، غنی‌نژاد و اخلاق داوری در تاریخ اندیشه" و پاسخ اینجانب به ایشان👇

👍52👎6

2 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC≈6,120 views85 reactionsread 29 August 2026

https://ghalamrorefah.ir/id/2998/

👍77👎8

1 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC≈5,280 views31 reactionsread 29 August 2026

https://donya-e-eqtesad.com/fa/tiny/news-4285760 آیا از کوچکتر بودن P/E در بازار سهام نسبت به P/R در بازار مسکن، می‌توان به این نتیجه‌ی ساده رسید که سهام ارزنده‌تر از مسکن است؟ در این مقاله نشان داده‌ام که مقایسه مستقیم این دو نسبت، بدون توجه به ماهیت عایدی، حقوق مالکیت و ریسک‌های این دو دارایی، می‌تواند گمراه‌کننده باشد. @MalekiBehrooz

👍28👎3

22 Jul 2026, 06:09 UTC≈6,880 views25 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍24👎1

22 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC≈8,100 views34 reactionsread 29 August 2026

https://donya-e-eqtesad.com/%D8%A8%D8%AE%D8%B4-%D8%B3%D8%B1%D9%85%D9%82%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%87-28/4283682-%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%82%D8%B9%DB%8C%D8%AA-%D9%87%D8%A7-%D8%A7%D8%AF%D8%B1%D8%A7%DA%A9-%D8%A7%D8%AC%D8%AA%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B9%DB%8C-%D9%81%D8%A7%DB%8C%D9%84-%D8%B5%D9%88%D8%AA%DB%8C مریم زارعیان، پاسخ می‌دهد که چرا این روزها اگر از کسی بپرسیم «حالت چطور است؟» از پاسخ «خوبم» امتناع می‌کند و آن را نوعی فاصله گرفتن از واقعیت یا

👍31👎3

12 Jul 2026, 11:50 UTC≈12,200 views60 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

دکتر مریم زارعیان، جامعه شناس و عضو هیات علمی به این پرسش پاسخ می‌دهد که چرا منافع ایرانیان داخل و خارج (دیاسپورا) لزوما هم راستا نیست؟ مطالعه فایل بالا راحتتر از لینک زیر است. www.tejaratefarda.com/بخش-اقتصاد-35/51894-میان-دو-ایران

👍51👎9

29 Jun 2026, 15:25 UTC≈11,900 views60 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

طی یک سال گذشته، متوسط قیمت خودرو داخلی حدود ۱۱۵ درصد رشد کرد! بورس هم علیرغم رشد مناسب ۴۰ روز اخیر، همچنان از همه بازارها عقب‌تر است. @MalekiBehrooz

👍58👎2

26 Jun 2026, 06:49 UTC≈12,700 views124 reactionsread 29 August 2026

اشتباه گرفتن همزمانی با علیت؛ روایت‌سازی به جای تحلیل در بازار مسکن در تحلیل بازارها، یکی از رایج‌ترین خطاهای شناختی آن است که زمان وقوع یک پدیده با علت وقوع آن اشتباه گرفته شود. همزمانی دو رخداد، به‌ویژه در فضای رسانه‌ای، به‌سادگی این تصور را ایجاد می‌کند که یکی علت دیگری است؛ حال آنکه در اقتصاد، همزمانی به‌تنهایی نشانه رابطه علّی نیست. اگر تحلیلگر گرفتار سوگیری تأییدی شود، به جای آزمون فرضیه، به دنبال شواهدی می‌گر

👍118👎6

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @MalekiBehrooz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@MalekiBehrooz edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
29 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

دادگاه مجازی رابین‌ هود
@dadgahmajzi · 81,986
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026
شبکه توسعه
@I_D_Network · 38,945
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 31 August 2026
Renani Mohsen / محسن رنانی
@Renani_Mohsen · 68,547
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
محمد حسین ادیب
@adibmh · 69,357
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“بهروز ملکی” (@MalekiBehrooz), 10,026 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MalekiBehrooz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.