Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Béla Jash

Channel

Béla Jash

@Bela_Jash_Thoughts

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

194subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002861803231
TypeChannel
Username@Bela_Jash_Thoughts
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Bela_Jash_Thoughts

Growth

18619419011 August 2026 — 188 subscribers12 August 2026 — 188 subscribers19 August 2026 — 189 subscribers27 August 2026 — 186 subscribers3 September 2026 — 193 subscribers19 September 2026 — 194 subscribers11 August 202619 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 38 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 185–195 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 05:39194+1
3 Sept 2026, 13:37193+7
27 Aug 2026, 01:57186-3
19 Aug 2026, 20:05189+1
12 Aug 2026, 03:14188no change
11 Aug 2026, 17:46188first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 14s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1338.2%
😢926.5%
👀38.82%
💯38.82%
🤣38.82%
🕊25.88%
🔥12.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC50 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

I have miserably failed to tie my hair back into a ponytail 🥀. You have my full permission to act like you don't know me if you see me on the road.

5 Aug 2026, 06:11 UTC74 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @cerebralsymphony

If you've ever actually listened to any woman in your life with any measure of empathy or sincerity, you have probably already heard of some, if not all, of what's been said here. However, as a man, you don't live what's being said here. You only hear it. So hear it whenever it's said.

1

5 Aug 2026, 06:11 UTC39 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @Frosty_sirensPhoto

Okay, this is finally up. Not a men vs women thing, not a lecture. A lot of us live in a bubble, tech, creative, liberal spaces, where things look fine for women, but there's a mindset that follows us out of it and into our own heads. I wrote a piece to show what it's actually like to move through the world as a woman, so you feel it instead of being argued at. Including what the "man-hater" is really reacting to, b

1

3 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC95 viewsread 11 August 2026

It's gonna be sad love songs for a while. Enjoy. And ironically, I think I'll be more active in my channels (copium).

18 Jul 2026, 07:49 UTC176 viewsread 11 August 2026

Lay on top of me. Force my lips open with your tongue. Lick the roof of my mouth. Suck the life out of me.

15 Jul 2026, 21:18 UTC208 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

The little things you do bring me immense joy. But it's a double-edged sword, for the little things you don't do make my heart ache.

2

14 Jul 2026, 18:52 UTC205 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @Bela_Philosophy_Thoughts

So, systemically, men became the subjects, and women (and other men with less power, but that's beside the point) the objects. The male gazes at the female and judges her, whether she looks pretty enough, and proper enough. Women internalize that gaze and look at themselves through the male perspective – not through their own – because being the perfect object is rewarded, and being a subject raises some brows. Mothe

💯32

14 Jul 2026, 18:51 UTC146 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @Bela_Philosophy_Thoughts

The day before my campus graduation program, I went to a women's hair salon to get my hair braided. The owner declined my request, saying her female clients wouldn't feel comfortable. Thankfully, I found another one that accepted me and did the braids you see on the post above. Two interesting thoughts (and corresponding conversations and research) occurred to me that day. One: Why exactly the women would feel uncom

14 Jul 2026, 18:51 UTC118 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @Bela_Philosophy_ThoughtsVideo

Gendered Spaces and Objectification June 26, 2026

3🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Bela_Jash_Thoughts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Béla Jash” (@Bela_Jash_Thoughts), 194 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bela_Jash_Thoughts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.