Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
46 measurements spanning 76 days, net -3,371. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 88,519–92,902 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 46
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Oct 2026, 23:18
89,025
-48
20 Oct 2026, 20:11
89,073
-59
19 Oct 2026, 22:14
89,132
-73
18 Oct 2026, 19:59
89,205
-34
17 Oct 2026, 20:07
89,239
-49
16 Oct 2026, 20:01
89,288
-48
15 Oct 2026, 17:08
89,336
-76
14 Oct 2026, 13:40
89,412
-88
13 Oct 2026, 02:36
89,500
-213
8 Oct 2026, 19:56
89,713
-271
4 Oct 2026, 07:00
89,984
-429
25 Sept 2026, 18:19
90,413
-325
19 Sept 2026, 02:41
90,738
-128
16 Sept 2026, 18:42
90,866
-91
14 Sept 2026, 18:55
90,957
-117
13 Sept 2026, 06:38
91,074
-109
11 Sept 2026, 09:59
91,183
-138
8 Sept 2026, 19:21
91,321
-180
5 Sept 2026, 09:16
91,501
-104
3 Sept 2026, 09:08
91,605
first reading
Engagement
62 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 160 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.18%
avg views ÷ 89,025 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,720
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 62 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 October 2026
Posts held
62 (20 July 2026 – 17 October 2026)
Views total
33,473
Reactions total
458
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Oct 2026, 03:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,860
Videos
≈266
Links
≈2,160
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
9,220 reactions across 59 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,117
44.7%
💯
1,838
19.9%
👍
951
10.3%
🔥
764
8.29%
❤🔥
256
2.78%
🥰
226
2.45%
🤗
150
1.63%
🥴
137
1.49%
🍾
119
1.29%
🎉
95
1.03%
👌
89
0.965%
🫡
85
0.922%
👀
73
0.792%
⚡
54
0.586%
🤝
50
0.542%
👏
26
0.282%
🤯
22
0.239%
😢
20
0.217%
😱
20
0.217%
🙈
18
0.195%
22 further kinds
110
1.19%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,220 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 17 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I really recommend the best crypto channel
These guys analyze the market and often anticipate the next move, giving you a chance to spot potential opportunities before the crowd does.
Check them out → https://t.me/+S95xk_7a-q85NGMy
💱Swap crypto instantly 💱
🪙50+ coins — BTC, ETH, XMR, SOL, USDT and more
😶No account, no email, no ID
🔓 AML Mode — XMR output for maximum privacy
Support @JolyIrony
Our Bot @SwapGenie_bot
Our Website https://tglink.io/310998ff559b11
Our Group https://telegram.me/ironswaps
🥀°When you can’t be controlled, you will be hated, and that’s the power.°
°Midnight Thoughts🥀•
💯121❤39👍22❤🔥5🔥4👏3🤗2🥴1
Signed °Bita🦋°
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @Bi_Amde. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ɪɴ ᴍʏ ғᴇᴇʟɪɴɢs™ @Musics_and_quotes · 44,751 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026
°•ᴍᴏᴏɴ•° @psyco_z · 49,666 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
MEN MONEY MINDSET 📚💼 @Men_Money_Mindset · 68,391 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
Inspiration Attitude @rich_motivational_quotes · 71,030 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Quotes Café @QuotesCafe1 · 71,413 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 August 2026
Oxford English @OxfordEnglishh · 104,517 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 August 2026
PSYCHO W🌍RLD ® @Psycho_Motivations · 110,582 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
Quotes ― Thoughts @Sad_quotes_Thoughts · 111,934 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
Pickup lines | Dating Master @pickupline0 · 43,980 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 August 2026
Impression | Money | Life Lesson 💼 @ImpressionMoney · 51,609 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
Feelings ― Soul Lines @Myfeelings_TM · 83,359 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
Infinity ∞ Thoughts @feelingsworldx · 90,752 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
LIFE TIPS @the_life_tips · 113,337 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
𝐒𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲 + 𝐖𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐭𝐡™ @SerenityWealth · 67,657 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
INSPIRATION TIPS™ @InspirationTipsTM · 78,357 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
Psychology Todays @Psycho_Todays · 44,311 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
Quotes, Facts, Psychology and Pick up Lines @quoteske001 · 65,126 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 August 2026
₿usiness Tips | Thoughts 💡 @business_ideas_thoughts · 44,709 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 August 2026
Wallpapers | Motivation | ₿usiness Tips…🚀 @special_pictures · 73,012 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
PROFILE PiCTURES™ @profile_wallps · 36 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
WallPapers | Profile Pictures @PinterestWallpapersHD · 99,718 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
Wallandia · 4K @wallandiamobile · 43,360 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
Buzz 📚 History @buzzhistory · 50,602 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 August 2026
School Of Wealth 🤑 @Success_Skills_keys · 43,118 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 66 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Midnight Thoughts” (@Bi_Amde), 89,025 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bi_Amde.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.