We live in a Generation where people get bored of you when you show them too much love. Quotes ❣
❤🔥1

Channel
@quoteske001
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
64,342subscribers
-5,029 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001887657873 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @quoteske001 |
| Description | 𝗠𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗷𝗼𝗶𝗻 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗻𝗲𝗿 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗹𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗺𝗮𝘇𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁: 👇🏻 ➡️ @wallpaper_channell1 ➡️ @twerk_videos1 ➡️ @jokersmokermemes001 ➡️ @kenyanmemesandjokes ➡️ @leaks_kenya1 ➡️ @porncomics001 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/quoteske001 |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 20:07 | 64,342 | -46 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 19:50 | 64,388 | -55 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 20:36 | 64,443 | -59 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:05 | 64,502 | -49 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 23:26 | 64,551 | -50 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 23:26 | 64,601 | -67 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:40 | 64,668 | -47 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 64,715 | -52 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 20:37 | 64,767 | -57 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 20:27 | 64,824 | -51 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:17 | 64,875 | -51 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 17:40 | 64,926 | -17 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 15:05 | 64,943 | -41 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 16:20 | 64,984 | -23 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:55 | 65,007 | -64 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:49 | 65,071 | -55 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 19:01 | 65,126 | -52 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:36 | 65,178 | -39 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:09 | 65,217 | -51 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:36 | 65,268 | first reading |
295 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 192 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 91 of 96 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 295 (1 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 74,340 |
| Reactions total | 582 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 01:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,000 reactions across 284 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,494 | 74.7% | |
| 🔥 | 145 | 7.25% | |
| 👏 | 75 | 3.75% | |
| ❤🔥 | 70 | 3.50% | |
| 👌 | 45 | 2.25% | |
| 😢 | 43 | 2.15% | |
| 💔 | 23 | 1.15% | |
| 🥰 | 23 | 1.15% | |
| 🤔 | 20 | 1.00% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 0.9% | |
| 🤝 | 16 | 0.8% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 0.75% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 0.15% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.15% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 0.1% | |
| 🤷♀ | 2 | 0.1% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.05% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.05% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 284 of the 295 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,000 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 295 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 97 posts held from the last 30 days (2.06%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
We live in a Generation where people get bored of you when you show them too much love. Quotes ❣
❤🔥1
Some lessons I learned the hard way. The love you give for free will always be treated like a second option. It's human nature to undervalue anything that comes without effort. Love itself never hurts, it's the people who don't know how to love. And you'll break yourself trying to fix someone who was never willing to choose you in the first place. Quotes ❣
Your peace is more important than proving yourself to anyone. Quotes ❣
Stay away from people who act like a victim in the problem they've created. Quotes ❣
❤3
You can replace me, of course. But finding someone with a heart and soul like mine impossible. Quotes ❣
🤝2
The curse of finding true love, but being born in a generation of cheaters and lust-filled monsters. Quotes ❣
❤7👌1
Nothing is overreacting. We all have different levels of sensitivity. If it hurts, it hurts. No explanation needed. Quotes ❣
❤4👏1
Nobody talks about how hard it is to stay away and not speak to somebody your-soul, body, and heart naturally yearn for. The discernment and discipline you have to try your best not even to think about. Nobody talks about how hard it is, and trust me, for those who are going to see this, I know how hard it is. It's going to be okay, though. Take it one day at a time, take a deep breath, and if they're meant to come b…
👏4❤🔥2
Disrespect can permanently shut doors that apologies cannot reopen. Consider this carefully. Quotes ❣
❤6👌1
I remember when my mom told me. The wrong one will find you-in peace and leave you in pieces, and the right one will find you in pieces and lead you to peace. I know someone needed to hear this today. Quotes ❣
👌4❤🔥2
Lately, I've noticed everybody looks okay until you eventually have a deep conversation with them. And then, you'll realize that, this is a sad generation of people struggling to survive through smiling faces and pretty pictures. Quotes ❣
❤🔥4🔥2
I don't beg for a seat where I wasn't welcomed. I don't chase those who choose to ignore or exclude me. I don't go to the ones who hurt me and expect healing. I won't burn myself out just to keep someone else comfortable. I build my own table. My own circle. One filled with people who truly see me, respect me, and love me for who I am. I've learned where my energy belongs and where it doesn't. And no matter what, I n…
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 295 posts we hold for @quoteske001. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 6 posts on @quoteske001 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Quotes, Facts, Psychology and Pick up Lines” (@quoteske001), 64,342 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quoteske001.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.