Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bookishfrenzy | Premium Ebooks and Audiobooks

Channel

Bookishfrenzy | Premium Ebooks and Audiobooks

@premium_ebooks

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

102,301subscribers

-381 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001357512436
TypeChannel
Username@premium_ebooks
Description🔵Request your favourite ebooks 👉 @Premiumebooksbot (please search in channel for book before requesting🙏) Buy Ads: https://telega.io/c/premium_ebooks
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/premium_ebooks

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

102,301103,099102,7006 August 2026 — 102,682 subscribers6 August 2026 — 102,696 subscribers7 August 2026 — 102,746 subscribers8 August 2026 — 102,782 subscribers9 August 2026 — 102,820 subscribers10 August 2026 — 102,808 subscribers11 August 2026 — 102,825 subscribers12 August 2026 — 102,875 subscribers13 August 2026 — 102,880 subscribers14 August 2026 — 102,894 subscribers16 August 2026 — 102,802 subscribers17 August 2026 — 102,846 subscribers18 August 2026 — 102,897 subscribers19 August 2026 — 102,944 subscribers20 August 2026 — 103,015 subscribers21 August 2026 — 103,079 subscribers23 August 2026 — 103,099 subscribers24 August 2026 — 103,057 subscribers25 August 2026 — 103,059 subscribers26 August 2026 — 103,056 subscribers28 August 2026 — 103,064 subscribers29 August 2026 — 103,031 subscribers30 August 2026 — 103,000 subscribers30 August 2026 — 102,963 subscribers31 August 2026 — 102,924 subscribers2 September 2026 — 102,899 subscribers3 September 2026 — 102,850 subscribers5 September 2026 — 102,787 subscribers8 September 2026 — 102,627 subscribers11 September 2026 — 102,536 subscribers13 September 2026 — 102,482 subscribers15 September 2026 — 102,400 subscribers17 September 2026 — 102,301 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -381. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 102,181–103,219 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 04:38102,301-99
15 Sept 2026, 02:14102,400-82
13 Sept 2026, 09:19102,482-54
11 Sept 2026, 10:38102,536-91
8 Sept 2026, 14:57102,627-160
5 Sept 2026, 11:15102,787-63
3 Sept 2026, 10:06102,850-49
2 Sept 2026, 01:15102,899-25
31 Aug 2026, 22:15102,924-39
30 Aug 2026, 22:25102,963-37
30 Aug 2026, 00:13103,000-31
29 Aug 2026, 02:06103,031-33
28 Aug 2026, 00:54103,064+8
26 Aug 2026, 23:33103,056-3
25 Aug 2026, 23:06103,059+2
24 Aug 2026, 21:05103,057-42
23 Aug 2026, 07:08103,099+20
21 Aug 2026, 20:17103,079+64
20 Aug 2026, 16:22103,015+71
19 Aug 2026, 16:32102,944first reading

Engagement

94 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.46%
avg views ÷ 102,301 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,510
59 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.076%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
63
of 94 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 32 of 59 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held94 (4 June 202621 September 2026)
Views total148,204
Reactions total88
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 21:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
903
Videos
3
Links
872

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

440 reactions across 54 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
32674.1%
🤣388.64%
🤡245.45%
👍204.55%
👏61.36%
🥰61.36%
🔥51.14%
😁51.14%
🌭40.909%
🌚20.455%
😍10.227%
😢10.227%
🙏10.227%
🤔10.227%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 94 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 440 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 94 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 01:54 UTC≈1,830 views2 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

A meaningful life requires more than happiness A fulfilling life isn’t built on pleasure alone. Happiness comes from a combination of enjoyment, satisfaction, and a sense that your life has meaning. But meaning often requires vulnerability. Love, relationships, and connection involve the possibility of rejection—and avoiding that pain completely can also mean avoiding experiences that give life depth. Don’t build

2

17 Sept 2026, 04:39 UTCviews —

Bookishfrenzy | Premium Ebooks and Audiobooks pinned «Join this book channel for interesting books and articles - https://t.me/SelfHelpbooks11»

17 Sept 2026, 04:39 UTC≈4,580 views0 reactionsread 22 September 2026

Join this book channel for interesting books and articles - https://t.me/SelfHelpbooks11

Showing the 12 most recent of 94 posts we hold for @premium_ebooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@premium_ebooks edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
30 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 September 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTCAnonymous Poll104 voters

Please choose which you think best suites for studio/literature company which makes novels, comics, games, etc.

  1. Fictvibe25%
  2. Fictional archives62%
  3. Drafite21%
  4. Kapayappa studios21%

The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 94 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Books | Selfhelp | Nonfiction
@books_rec · 63,443
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026
eBook Room
@eBookRoom · 332,968
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 12 August 2026
eBooks Cafe
@eBooksCafe · 62,290
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 21 August 2026
Audio Books Archive
@AudiobooksArchive · 132,655
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 13 August 2026
Books Mania
@booksmania · 76,799
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 August 2026
Books
@books · 215,007
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 August 2026
English Books Magazines Novels
@Novels_English_Books_Magazines · 217,021
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
Books Hub: Free Ebook & Audiobook
@bookshub25 · 276,668
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 12 August 2026
@BooksThief
@BooksThief · 52,097
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 24 August 2026
𝗦𝗲𝗹𝗳 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗕𝗼𝗼𝗸𝘀
@selfimprovementbooks1 · 43,473
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 28 August 2026
Books in English | Умные книги на английском | Non-fiction
@muscatnonfiction · 66,214
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 August 2026
Rare Books Of India
@Indian_History_Books_PDF_UPSC · 57,467
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 23 August 2026
Active English ᵖˡᵘˢ
@Activeenglishplus · 54,343
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 23 August 2026
IELTS|Newspapers & Magazines|English
@eMagzinewspars · 61,876
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 22 August 2026
Linkedin Learning
@linkedin_learning · 217,837
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 11 August 2026
School Of Wealth 🤑
@Success_Skills_keys · 43,850
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
Quotes, Facts, Psychology and Pick up Lines
@quoteske001 · 66,811
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 August 2026
ChatGPT Tips, Prompts & AI Tools
@GPT_ChatGPT_AI_Tools · 60,676
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
English With Masters
@EngMasters · 74,796
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
Curiosity Tea ☕️
@Curiosity_Tea · 76,514
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
🟣🟢 English Trunk | Английский язык
@trunkietrunk · 53,625
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 24 August 2026
Ayurveda Yoga Meditation आयुर्वेद
@Ayurveda_Yoga_Meditation · 43,410
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 28 August 2026
Motivational Quotes Thoughts Status
@Motivational_Quotes_Thoughts · 95,714
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 August 2026
🔱Motivational🔱
@motivational · 63,309
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bookishfrenzy | Premium Ebooks and Audiobooks” (@premium_ebooks), 102,301 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/premium_ebooks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.