Channel
@Bitcoin_Podcast_IA
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001905947704 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Bitcoin_Podcast_IA |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Bitcoin_Podcast_IA |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 10 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 10 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Tu_frase_semilla_no_es_seguridad_real.m4a (Audio 15 min) Fuente: Aug 12, 2026 https://x.com/i/status/2087348698674295105 https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5534 Cuaderno https://notebook.google.com/notebook/86613cfa-ae19-4c39-b828-ccd5901fc276?authuser=7
Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏
En este texto, Craig S. Wright (CSW) sostiene que la comunidad actual de blockchain comete un error de categoría fundamental al tratar la seguridad de los ahorros de toda una vida con el mismo modelo que una transacción pequeña de efectivo digital. Sus puntos principales son los siguientes: * Una clave no es una arquitectura de seguridad: Wright argumenta que una clave privada es simplemente una credencial, no un…
Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏
Mil_millones_de_transacciones_por_segundo.m4a Linear Horizontal Scaling in Pipelined Blockchain Transaction Processing: Architecture, Proof, and Fleet-scale Arithmetic 80 Pages Posted: 10 Aug 2026 Dr Craig S Wright University of Exeter; 11 Agosto 2026 (Audio 20 min) El documento detalla las bases matemáticas y técnicas de la arquitectura de Teranode para el procesamiento de transacciones de Bitcoin a gran escala E…
Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏
La_Evolución_del_Valor.mp4 BSV: El Bitcoin Original y la Soberanía Financiera Digital 9 ago 2026 1 fuente https://youtu.be/LVHTSoc3t0M?si=aP7zfH-Lv0A6IsEi Cuaderno https://notebook.google.com/notebook/39685bf2-3a5c-4e25-bd2a-de03bdd00c8f https://t.me/RamonQuesadaNews/17211
Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏
BSV: El Bitcoin Original y la Soberanía Financiera Digital 1 fuente 9 ago 2026 (Audio 15:28 min) Conversación sobre Bitcoin SV (BSV), defendiéndolo como el diseño original y legítimo de Satoshi Nakamoto frente a lo que consideran versiones corrompidas como el BTC. Los ponentes argumentan que el sistema financiero global y el sector de las criptomonedas han sido manipulados por una cábala de banqueros para eliminar l…
Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏
MiCAR & Crypto 1 fuente 27 jun 2026 (Audio 16:12 min) Este sitio web detalla el cumplimiento de la plataforma LCX con el reglamento MiCAR de la Unión Europea, el cual exige transparencia informativa para los activos digitales. La normativa obliga a los emisores a publicar libros blancos (whitepapers) que describan los riesgos, la tecnología y los derechos asociados a cada criptomoneda. Actualmente, existe un periodo…
Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏
Dave Kleiman SHA-256 2 fuentes 15 jun 2026 (Audio 20 min) El documento técnico RFC 4880 establece el estándar oficial para el formato de mensajes de OpenPGP, detallando los protocolos de criptografía, firmas digitales y gestión de claves. Esta normativa técnica define cómo se estructuran los paquetes de datos para garantizar la confidencialidad y la integridad de la información en entornos digitales. Entre sus auto…
Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏
La_huella_forense_de_Satoshi_Nakamoto.m4a (Audio 25:53 min) Fuente 25 datos poco conocidos sobre Satoshi Nakamoto extraídos de correos electrónicos, código y metadatos. https://news.bitcoin.com/es/25-datos-poco-conocidos-sobre-satoshi-nakamoto-extraidos-de-correos-electronicos-codigo-y-metadatos/ Cuaderno https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/4d1101b5-fde0-419f-96a9-ebabd05c85ea https://t.me/RamonQuesadaNews/168…
Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏
El_Litigio_Noah_Doe.mp4
👍1
Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏
El_juicio_por_los_millones_de_Satoshi.m4a (Audio 19:15 min) Cuaderno https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/4a787d08-067f-4491-93c1-6085c9b9e5ef
👍1
Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏
Bitcoin Agentico: El Estándar x402 y el Futuro de BSV 29 may 2026 (Audio 28:45 min) Esta fuente consiste en una entrevista del pódcast Proof of Claim donde se explora la intersección entre Bitcoin SV (BSV), la inteligencia artificial y la soberanía de datos. El invitado, John Calhoun, explica cómo el estándar BRC-100 facilita la creación de aplicaciones al unificar la comunicación entre carteras y plataformas digita…
Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏
Contabilidad de Triple Entrada: El Nuevo Paradigma de la Evidencia. 26 may 2026 (Audio 23:39 min) La contabilidad de triple entrada no como un sistema de transparencia pública, sino como una herramienta avanzada de verificación de evidencia. El autor sostiene que su función principal es crear un registro compartido e inalterable que vincule las operaciones entre empresas sin exponer secretos comerciales. Mediante el…
Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Bitcoin_Podcast_IA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bitcoin Podcast Cuadernos NoteBookLM” (@Bitcoin_Podcast_IA), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bitcoin_Podcast_IA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.