Channel
@S_Tominaga
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
162subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002198598715 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @S_Tominaga |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/S_Tominaga |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 162 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 161 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 160 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:41 | 160 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Los estudios académicos han demostrado técnicas de interconexión capaces de vincular nodos Lightning con direcciones Bitcoin e inferir información sobre saldos, remitentes y destinatarios. Por consiguiente, la privacidad en Lightning es relevante, pero no absoluta ni garantizada. La conclusión correcta es, por tanto, más seria que la exagerada. 2/2 Craig Wright 4 de agosto de 2026 https://x.com/i/status/20845214275…
Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏
La afirmación precisa no es que Taproot facilite el robo inicial de BTC. El robo aún requiere claves comprometidas, fraude, coacción, una violación de la custodia u otro fallo de control. Lo que Taproot facilita es ocultar lo que sucede después. Antes de Taproot, las diferentes formas de gasto a menudo dejaban huellas digitales distintas en la cadena de bloques. Una firma convencional, un acuerdo de multifirma y un…
Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏
The precise claim is not that Taproot makes the initial theft of BTC easier. Theft still requires compromised keys, fraud, coercion, a custodial breach or some other failure of control. What Taproot makes easier is concealing what happens afterwards. Before Taproot, different forms of spending often left different on-chain fingerprints. A conventional signature, a multisignature arrangement and a complex script cou…
Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏
Craig Wright 4 de agosto de 2026 https://x.com/i/status/2084521427500470467 https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5514
Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏
https://x.com/i/status/2084575756743778731
Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏
Los próximos veinte años cambiarán el mundo, aunque no de la manera que actualmente publicitan aquellos que confunden una demostración de producto con el destino. La IA no «tomará el control». Los modelos de lenguaje grandes mejorarán. Los sistemas de razonamiento se volverán más capaces. Las herramientas se volverán más rápidas, más precisas y más profundamente integradas en el trabajo cotidiano. Pero las herramie…
Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏
Craig Wright 3 de agosto de 2026 https://x.com/i/status/2084454198960161247 https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5511
Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏
Bitcoin no tiene un rey. Ese era precisamente el punto. Sin embargo, aquellos que proclaman la descentralización con más vehemencia parecen estar perpetuamente desesperados por encontrar un soberano. Quieren que Satoshi regrese, sentado en un trono, y que les diga qué reglas seguir, qué cambios aprobar y qué se le permite convertirse a Bitcoin. Es el mismo impulso dirigido hacia John Galt en La rebelión de Atlas. …
👏1
Signed Admon S y C
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Admon S y C
https://x.com/i/status/2083749157966360615
Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏
Bitcoin después del casino: El capitalismo digital de Wright 2 agosto 2026 (Audio 20 min) Este texto de Craig Wright presenta al Bitcoin no como un activo especulativo, sino como una herramienta económica fundamental para el comercio global y la creación de propiedad digital. El autor sostiene que la verdadera innovación reside en un protocolo fijo que garantiza previsibilidad institucional y permite el desarrollo d…
Signed Ramon Quesada. † 🙏
Bitcoin no debería ser gobernado por desarrolladores, exchanges, comités, fundaciones, mineros o facciones de redes sociales. La gobernanza significa el poder de cambiar las reglas—y quienquiera que pueda cambiar las reglas controla en última instancia a todos los que dependen de ellas. El consenso no es gobernanza. La prueba de trabajo no le da a los mineros el derecho de rediseñar Bitcoin. Permite a procesadores c…
Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @S_Tominaga. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CSW S. Tominaga (2024 07) fin COPA” (@S_Tominaga), 162 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/S_Tominaga.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.