Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Возвращение в Брайдсхед

Channel

Возвращение в Брайдсхед

@Brideshead_Revisited

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,014subscribers

-51 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001054603552
TypeChannel
Username@Brideshead_Revisited
DescriptionПовсюду искал я покоя и в одном лишь месте обрёл его — в углу, с книгою Для связи - @Lucy_Fragile
Created15 May 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Brideshead_Revisited

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,0149,0659,039.55 August 2026 — 9,065 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,065 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,064 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,061 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,059 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,050 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,048 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,053 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,045 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,043 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,041 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,039 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,041 subscribers30 September 2026 — 9,032 subscribers13 October 2026 — 9,025 subscribers16 October 2026 — 9,024 subscribers22 October 2026 — 9,016 subscribers25 October 2026 — 9,021 subscribers28 October 2026 — 9,017 subscribers4 November 2026 — 9,016 subscribers6 November 2026 — 9,014 subscribers5 August 20266 November 2026
21 measurements spanning 93 days, net -51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,006–9,073 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 21:109,014-2
4 Nov 2026, 00:299,016-1
28 Oct 2026, 13:469,017-4
25 Oct 2026, 16:449,021+5
22 Oct 2026, 10:199,016-8
16 Oct 2026, 03:199,024-1
13 Oct 2026, 04:479,025-7
30 Sept 2026, 11:599,032-9
15 Sept 2026, 18:199,041+2
11 Sept 2026, 20:169,039-2
2 Sept 2026, 08:489,041-2
30 Aug 2026, 18:479,043-2
27 Aug 2026, 17:459,045-8
25 Aug 2026, 01:459,053+5
21 Aug 2026, 08:239,048-2
17 Aug 2026, 22:529,050-9
15 Aug 2026, 01:379,059-2
11 Aug 2026, 20:429,061-3
9 Aug 2026, 03:519,064-1
6 Aug 2026, 02:529,065first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 8 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.1%
avg views ÷ 9,014 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,450
1 post measured
Reaction rate
7.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026
Posts held23 (8 November 2025 – 21 October 2026)
Views total1,450
Reactions total109
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 10:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,120
Videos
≈5
Links
≈329

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
43s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,105 reactions across 23 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,26540.7%
🔥83827.0%
👍39012.6%
😱1635.25%
💔772.48%
👀732.35%
🤔571.84%
🗿551.77%
🤩411.32%
🥰401.29%
🦄401.29%
👏270.87%
🍓140.451%
👎140.451%
😇70.225%
🤨20.064%
🎉10.032%
🤯10.032%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,105 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 8 November 2025 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 23 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Brideshead_Revisited. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 November 2025 to 21 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

21 Oct 2026, 16:14 UTC≈1,450 views109 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Я уже писала про скульптуры, найденные в 2022 году под Сиеной, а тут вдруг попалось еще одно чудесное фото. Бронзовая скульптура, изображающая римского мальчика.

❤75🔥24👍10

7 Oct 2026, 07:12 UTC≈2,290 views110 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026
Photo

Фрески из Испанской капеллы там же, в Санта-Мария-Новелла, тоже чудо как хороши. Джон Рёскин в своей книге "Прогулки по Флоренции", которую я недавно читала, посвятил этой капелле целую главу. А вот Гирландайо старый ворчун не любит (да и Б-г с ним).

❤73🔥22👍13🥰2

27 Sept 2026, 19:06 UTC≈2,890 views143 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026
Photo

Изумительный Доменико Гирландайо

🔥69❤51👍11🤩7😇2🎉1👏1🥰1

19 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC≈4,040 views131 reactions4 Starsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Бронзовая римская лампа в форме ступни. II-IV век. Масло заливалось через "лодыжку", а огонь горел в большом пальце. Такие лампы обычно подвешивали на цепи.

🔥80❤36👍10👀4🗿1

16 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC≈3,770 views119 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Хендрик Мартенс Сорг. Рыбный рынок. Между 1650 и 1670. В те времена на некоторых рыбных рынках держали специальных ручных аистов. В конце дня голодных птичек запускали в торговые ряды и они съедали остатки рыбы, облегчая дальшейную уборку.

❤78👍22🔥9🦄8🥰2

10 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC≈4,160 views141 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

В том же туалете нашли обрывки шелка — вот так в Средние века выглядела дорогая туалетная бумага.

❤55🔥40🤔19👀10🤩9👍5🍓3

10 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC≈3,450 views144 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026
Photo

Это записная книжка, которую археологи нашли в немецком городе Падерборн. Примерно 700-800 лет назад владелец уронил ее в дыру в туалете. Блокнот, сделанный из пергамента, дерева и воска, хорошо сохранился, лежа во влажной почве без доступа воздуха. 10 кожаных страниц размером 10х7,5 см покрыты воском и исписаны с обеих сторон. Страницы были скреплены и спрятаны под кожаную обложку с тисненым рисунком — лилиями. Хо…

🔥85❤27👍15👀8😱5🤨2🥰2

7 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC≈2,980 views107 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Лукас Кранах Старший. Суд Париса. 1530-1535 гг. Женщины Кранаха Старшего — отдельная глава в истории искусства.

❤69🔥20👍10🍓6🦄2

25 Jul 2026, 09:35 UTC≈5,480 views149 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Одиссей прячется от циклопа под брюшком у барана. Римская статуя, вероятно, конец I века. Из коллекции виллы Торлония, Рим

❤117👍22🦄8🥰2

21 Jul 2026, 17:07 UTC≈5,640 views169 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Шлем из кабаньих клыков. XIV век до н.э. Найден в Микенах. Хранится в Национальном археологическом музее Афин. Вот в чем-то таком греки и штурмовали Трою.

👍78🔥53❤26👀7🤩3🗿1🥰1

25 Jun 2026, 07:24 UTC≈4,990 views169 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @mylousycollectionPhoto

Я думал это у меня нездоровая любовь к пешим прогулкам. Но потом прочитал про художника Карла Вутке. В 1874 году он, утомившись от учебы в мастерской Аггджело Квальо-младшего в Мюнхене, взял с собой саквояж с самым необходимым и отправился в пеший вояж… в Италию. Там он задержался на два года: писал пейзажи в окрестностях Рима, перебивался случайными заработками и дегустировал вина в местных остериях. Картина в этом…

❤122🔥31👍16

18 Jun 2026, 17:10 UTC≈4,190 views81 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Деревянная модель собора по проекту Сангалло. 4,68 м в высоту. 1539-1546 гг.

🔥45❤26👍8🤔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @Brideshead_Revisited. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

История и истории
@historygothy · 20,850
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 September 2026
МЕЛОДИЯ
@firmamelodiya · 35,894
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
Пробковый шлем
@pithhelmet · 23,218
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 September 2026
Намочи манту
@namochimanturu · 56,222
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Возвращение в Брайдсхед” (@Brideshead_Revisited), 9,014 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Brideshead_Revisited.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.