Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Моя никчемная коллекция

Channel

Моя никчемная коллекция

@mylousycollection

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,099subscribers

+173 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001322241948
TypeChannel
Username@mylousycollection
Created20 July 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mylousycollection

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,9269,0999,012.56 August 2026 — 8,926 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,926 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,932 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,951 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,962 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,965 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,974 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,985 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,989 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,987 subscribers7 September 2026 — 9,059 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,082 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,089 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,099 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net +173. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,900–9,125 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 23:169,099+10
14 Sept 2026, 21:389,089+7
11 Sept 2026, 18:419,082+23
7 Sept 2026, 13:009,059+72
2 Sept 2026, 21:458,987-2
27 Aug 2026, 19:388,989+4
25 Aug 2026, 01:368,985+11
21 Aug 2026, 19:268,974+9
18 Aug 2026, 16:138,965+3
15 Aug 2026, 17:368,962+11
12 Aug 2026, 13:458,951+19
6 Aug 2026, 10:108,932+6
6 Aug 2026, 03:008,926no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:538,926first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.7%
avg views ÷ 9,099 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,160
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held36 (31 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total9,280
Reactions total930
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

5,141 reactions across 35 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,18261.9%
❤‍🔥59211.5%
🔥4138.03%
👍2625.10%
😍2023.93%
😁1883.66%
👏1102.14%
💋480.934%
🤩350.681%
💘290.564%
💅160.311%
🦄120.233%
🌚110.214%
💔100.195%
🍓90.175%
😱80.156%
🤯80.156%
😘30.058%
🍾10.019%
🎉10.019%
1 further kind10.019%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,280 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 36 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mylousycollection. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 36 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC740 views94 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ола Билльгрен (1940-2001) — Лето (1969)

60❤‍🔥22👍7🔥4💔1

27 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC≈1,090 views156 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Просто напоминаю: на картине «Пан в тростнике» художника Арнольда Бёклина присутствуют три жабки

98🔥25💋10❤‍🔥7👏7😍7👍2

26 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC≈1,160 views92 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Панкрац Кёрле был чрезвычайно сложным человеком. Вечно ругался с отцом, который мечтал, чтобы непутевый сын стал пекарем. Со страшным скандалом отчислился из престижной Мюнхенской академии художеств. Все три года учебы у знаменитого живописца Фердинанда Вальдмюллера открыто конфликтовал с ним из-за тематики своих полотен — тот не одобрял одержимость Кёрле изображением быта прислуги в богатых домах Вены. Вишенка на то

62❤‍🔥16🔥12👍1👏1

26 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC≈1,110 views106 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Панкрац Кёрле (1823-1875) — Именинный торт (дата создания неизвестна)

65❤‍🔥21👍15🔥5

25 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC≈1,230 views125 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Жизнь Жана Фердинанда Моншаблона — воплощение тайной мечты многих из нас: бросить все и уехать в деревню. В 1880-х он жил в Париже и осознал, что толпы на бульварах, шумные веранды cafe, полумрак сомнительных кабаре на Монмартре и крошечные съемные апартаменты на мансардах — совершенно ему не по душе. Вместе с женой Фанни он перебрался в родную Лотарингию, в крошечный городок Шатийон-сюр-Сон (сейчас там живет около с

91🔥22❤‍🔥8👍4

25 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC≈1,220 views128 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Жан Фердинанд Моншаблон (1854-1904) — Река Сона в коммуне Лиронкур, департамент Вогезы (дата создания неизвестна)

88👍20🔥12❤‍🔥8

24 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC≈1,390 views111 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Герберт Бэдэм из прошлого поста занимает особое место у меня в сердечке: в отличие от большинства своих австралийских коллег начала и середины 20 века он изображал не европейские пейзажи и не элегантных mesdames и messieurs, а обычных сиднейцев — как они сидят на лавочках, выпивают в пабах, едут уставшими после работы. Одни арт-критики безжалостно громили его работы и обзывали их «плебейскими», другие наоборот — хвал

66❤‍🔥26👍12🔥4👏3

24 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC≈1,340 views118 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Герберт Бэдэм (1899-1961) — На завтрак (1936)

88😍15❤‍🔥8👍5🤯2

23 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC≈1,620 views192 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Арнольд Лобел (1933-1987) — «Мышь на побережье», иллюстрация для своего сборника рассказов для детей «Fables», издательство Harper & Row (1980)

132❤‍🔥36👍11💘7🔥3🌚2😁1

22 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC≈1,750 views161 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Кай Пэн — Серия иллюстраций «Every person in Tokyo» с жителями Токио (все работы созданы в 2026 году)

116🔥22❤‍🔥12👏8👍3

21 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC≈1,630 views139 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Это что еще за обложка Vogue? Картина «Тетя Агата» Гордона Куттса, написанная в 1897 году, запросто могла бы украсить модный глянец. Кто именно на ней изображен — до сих пор неизвестно, но точно не тетя Куттса. Вероятнее всего, это его вторая жена и бывшая ученица Элис, с которой они разведутся со страшным скандалом в 1918 году

91🔥35❤‍🔥10👍2👏1

20 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC≈1,710 views172 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Раз уж в канале появился Шарль ван ден Эйкен, то не могу не показать свою вторую любимую картину у него — «Bon appetit». Вообще-то наш мальчик Эйкен учился на пейзажиста, но в какой-то момент на его жизненном пути возникла фигура Жозефа Стивенса, мастера спорта по части реалистичного изображения животных. Все эти безлюдные пейзажи зимнего леса и виды богом забытых деревень были моментально забыты. Шарль переключился

109😁35🔥16❤‍🔥9👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @mylousycollection. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

домики
@domiki_everyday · 22,328
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Моя никчемная коллекция” (@mylousycollection), 9,099 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mylousycollection.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.