🧭 AI for Everyday IT: Accelerate workplace productivity (2025) 💬 "AI for Everyday IT" — прикладная книга о повседневных задачах, а не о разработке моделей. Аудитория — админы, поддержка, ИТ-менеджеры; технической подготовки почти не требуется. Ограничение жанра стоит держать в голове: интерфейсы и возможности сервисов меняются быстрее выхода изданий, поэтому переносимая ценность — в подходах к постановке задачи и пр…

Channel
BugUser | Курсы, Программирование
@BugUser
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11,373subscribers
-111 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001485800733 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BugUser |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BugUser |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 11,373 | -6 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:56 | 11,379 | -5 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:22 | 11,384 | -9 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 11,393 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 11,395 | -6 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:17 | 11,401 | -4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 11,405 | -6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 11,411 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:02 | 11,419 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:27 | 11,422 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 11,428 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 11,429 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:43 | 11,428 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 11,432 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 11,437 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 11,439 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 11,441 | -10 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 11,451 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:19 | 11,454 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 11,459 | first reading |
Engagement
98 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.24%
- avg views ÷ 11,373 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 254
- 34 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.177%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 34
- of 98 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 34 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 98 (31 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 8,643 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 01:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4s
- Average length
- 4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 66.7% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 98 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 98 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Китайская нейросеть, которая заменяет подписку на GPT — бесплатно и оффлайн 2026 год – новая эпоха для DeepSeek. Китайская нейросеть работает прямо на вашем устройстве, обгоняет западные модели и снимает все ограничения: без подписок, без интернета, без контроля. Зерокодер обновил практикум и собрал все, что важно знать о локальных моделях и как с ними работать. ⚡️Что ждет вас на вебинаре? – Покажем, как установит…
🧭 High Performance Python, 3rd Edition (2025) 💬 "High Performance Python" — книга о доказательной оптимизации: сначала измерение, потом правка, с разбором того, почему интерпретатор ведёт себя именно так. Рассчитана на опытных Python-разработчиков и специалистов по данным; синтаксис здесь не объясняют. Третье издание обновлено под актуальные версии языка и инструментов, включая изменения, связанные с GIL. 🕕 Скачать…
🧭 Pro Microservices in .NET 10: A Holistic Approach to Building Microservices in C# (2025) 💬 "Pro Microservices in .NET 10" — материал привязан к текущей версии платформы, что заметно по инструментарию: современные .NET-средства для распределённых приложений в книге задействованы. Рассчитана на C#-разработчиков с опытом ASP.NET Core, которым предстоит переход к сервисной архитектуре. Полезнее всего разбор компромисс…
🧭 earning Python: Powerful Object-Oriented Programming, 5th edition. Mark Lutz. O'Reilly (2013) 💬 "Learning Python" — фундаментальный и очень объёмный курс: каждая конструкция разбирается до уровня «как это устроено внутри», а не «как этим пользоваться». Подойдёт тем, кто готов к медленному систематическому чтению; для быстрого старта книга слишком подробна. Пятое издание вышло в 2013 году и покрывает Python 3.3 и 2…
🧭 Effective Indexing in Postgres: Creating the Best Index for Your Queries 💬 "Effective Indexing in Postgres" — узкоспециальная книга: индексы разбираются не как список типов, а от задачи оптимизации конкретного запроса. Рассчитана на разработчиков и DBA, уже пишущих сложный SQL и упирающихся в производительность. Год издания указывать не берусь — точных данных нет, а сочинять не буду. 🕕 Скачать бесплатно @BugUser
🧭 The Golden Ticket: P, NP, and the Search for the Impossible. Lance Fortnow (2013) 💬 "The Golden Ticket" — научно-популярное изложение: автор — исследователь в теории сложности, но формул в книге почти нет, объяснения строятся на аналогиях и истории вопроса. Подойдёт разработчикам без формального CS-образования и всем, кому интересна постановка задачи, а не её решение. Заменой учебнику по теории вычислений книга не…
🧭 Practical Neural Network Recipes in C++. Timothy Masters (1993) 💬 "Practical Neural Network Recipes in C++" — книга 1993 года, и это определяет её место: современный стек, глубокие архитектуры и работа на GPU здесь отсутствуют по хронологическим причинам. Ценность сегодня историческая и учебная — математика обучения разбирается на уровне кода, без фреймворка, скрывающего механику. Как практическое руководство для …
🧭 Learn Java with Projects: A concise practical guide to learning everything a Java professional really needs to know (2023) 💬 "Learn Java with Projects" — теория закрепляется проектами, а не отдельными упражнениями на синтаксис. Порог входа низкий: подойдёт новичкам и разработчикам с других языков, приходящим в Java. Отбор тем прикладной — акцент на том, что действительно используется в рабочем коде, поэтому книга …
🧭 Persistence Best Practices for Java Applications (2023) 💬 "Persistence Best Practices for Java Applications" — про принципы и компромиссы слоя данных, а не про пошаговое руководство по Hibernate. Рассчитана на Java-разработчиков с опытом, которые уже сталкивались с непредсказуемым поведением ORM. Практический результат — понимание, почему запрос выполняется именно так, и умение выбрать модель хранения до того, как…
🧭 Edge Computing Patterns for Solution Architects: Learn methods and principles of resilient distributed application architectures from hybrid cloud to far edge (2024) 💬 "Edge Computing Patterns for Solution Architects" — книга каталогизирует архитектурные паттерны, а не разбирает конкретный вендорский стек, поэтому решения переносимы. Рассчитана на архитекторов и платформенных инженеров, знакомых с распределёнными …
🧭 Django in Production: Expert tips, strategies, and essential frameworks for writing scalable and maintainable code in Django (2024) 💬 "Django in Production" — книга начинается там, где заканчиваются учебники: проект уже работает локально, вопрос в эксплуатации. Рассчитана на разработчиков, знающих Django на уровне моделей, вью и админки. Ценность — в перечне решений, которые проще принять до запуска: структура на…
Showing the 12 most recent of 98 posts we hold for @BugUser. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BugUser | Курсы, Программирование” (@BugUser), 11,373 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BugUser.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.