Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝙱𝚞𝚗𝚗𝚢 𝙸𝚐𝚕𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚊𝚜

Channel

𝙱𝚞𝚗𝚗𝚢 𝙸𝚐𝚕𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚊𝚜

@BunnyIgleesse

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

232subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002667464882
TypeChannel
Username@BunnyIgleesse
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/BunnyIgleesse

Growth

223234228.59 August 2026 — 226 subscribers10 August 2026 — 227 subscribers17 August 2026 — 223 subscribers24 August 2026 — 231 subscribers1 September 2026 — 234 subscribers11 September 2026 — 228 subscribers18 September 2026 — 232 subscribers2329 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 40 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 221–236 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 15:39232+4
11 Sept 2026, 06:55228-6
1 Sept 2026, 10:28234+3
24 Aug 2026, 16:35231+8
17 Aug 2026, 18:14223-4
10 Aug 2026, 02:21227+1
9 Aug 2026, 22:16226first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

181 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53729180161514196104424.3%
custom 53278399592629860333519.3%
custom 53751952292865966502413.3%
custom 52291411898941010072312.7%
2111.6%
custom 5377460528182488487116.08%
custom 5377660222686918374105.52%
custom 537065131709618557563.31%
custom 537751565838270295142.21%
👎31.66%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 181 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BunnyIgleesse. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC107 views13 reactions10 Starsread 9 August 2026

Еще пара слов.. Не тратьте так много на этот тгк, он создан по фану и если мне станет скучно, то я могу забросить. Так что пожалуйста тратьте звездочки/деньги на тех, кто это правда заслуживает. Те же каналы всяких Михаэлев, Нэссов, Исаги, Хьюго, Банни и т.д. Благодарен за все подарки, но больше не стоит!🤍

custom 52291411898941010078👎3custom 53278399592629860332

4 Aug 2026, 22:37 UTC122 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Это вообще законно?

custom 522914118989410100782

4 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC115 views7 reactions5 Starsread 9 August 2026

Я искренне благодарен. Прекратите. 🌟

custom 53278399592629860334custom 53751952292865966502custom 53774605281824884871

4 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC102 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

адм: я, конечно, все понимаю. Но давайте прекращайте транжирить. Экономьте свои звезды, мне их жалко.

custom 537291801615141961032

4 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC98 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Помечу этот день в календаре. 5 августа - всемирный день задаривания Банни. Благодарю.

custom 53729180161514196104custom 53706513170961855752custom 53774605281824884871

4 Aug 2026, 20:28 UTC105 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Коментарии существуют, к слову.

custom 53729180161514196107custom 53776602226869183745custom 53774605281824884872

4 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC93 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Погоди, это реально?

custom 53774605281824884877custom 537291801615141961021custom 53706513170961855751

4 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC92 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Буду честен, я не нахожу слов. Это довольно мило с вашей стороны. Благодарствую.

custom 53729180161514196107custom 53706513170961855751

4 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC88 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Это имеет какое-либо отношение к произошедшему? Помогаете пережить стресс? Польщен.🌟

custom 53729180161514196106custom 52291411898941010071

4 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC97 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Благодарю вас😁

custom 53751952292865966508custom 52291411898941010071

4 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC102 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

О Боже. Как же тут неприятно.. благоухает. Я ненавижу свою жизнь.

custom 537519522928659665071custom 53278399592629860331

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BunnyIgleesse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝙱𝚞𝚗𝚗𝚢 𝙸𝚐𝚕𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚊𝚜” (@BunnyIgleesse), 232 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BunnyIgleesse.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.