Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ᴍɪᴄʜᴀᴇʟ ᴋᴀɪꜱᴇʀ🌹

Channel

ᴍɪᴄʜᴀᴇʟ ᴋᴀɪꜱᴇʀ🌹

@michaelkaiser_official

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

630subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002476706654
TypeChannel
Username@michaelkaiser_official
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/michaelkaiser_official

Growth

627638632.56 August 2026 — 635 subscribers6 August 2026 — 634 subscribers15 August 2026 — 627 subscribers23 August 2026 — 638 subscribers30 August 2026 — 634 subscribers9 September 2026 — 630 subscribers6306 August 20269 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 34 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 625–640 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 15:39630-4
30 Aug 2026, 17:05634-4
23 Aug 2026, 12:59638+11
15 Aug 2026, 00:24627-7
6 Aug 2026, 22:40634-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:16635first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

688 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 539805166655139737111917.3%
❤‍🔥6910.0%
🍾689.88%
custom 5399942616097776692659.45%
🍓649.30%
💯608.72%
😍527.56%
😭446.40%
💘405.81%
custom 5395763754652685638395.67%
custom 5298515056437258316273.92%
202.91%
🔥121.74%
custom 540013296045839942291.31%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 688 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
45
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 20 we hold a reading for · 80%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @michaelkaiser_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC66 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @IsagiYoichi_BlogPhoto

🤍:: 𝓦𝖾𝗅𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝑡𝑜. . . 🌟🌟 𝖨𝗌𝖺𝗀𝗂 𝖸𝗈𝗂𝖼𝗁𝗂 𝒷𝗅𝗈𝗀🌟 ➕🤩🎀огда всё идёт не по твоему плану, единственное, что ты можешь изменить, — это самого себя. 🤍🤍🤍

6 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC59 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @RinItoshiofficialPhoto

➡️ 𝑊𝐸𝐿𝐶𝑂𝑀𝐸 𝑇𝑂… ㅤ︎ㅤ︎︎ 𝐼𝑇𝑂𝑆𝐻𝐼 𝑅𝐼𝑁 𝑂𝐹𝐹𝐼𝐶𝐼𝐴𝐿 𝐴𝐶𝐶𝑂𝑈𝑁𝑇 ㅤ︎︎••• Разрушение — это единственная истинная форма контроля. Хирургически точный акт превращения чужого пика силы в прах. Лишь в этой руине рождается чистый абсолют.. ㅤ︎︎ ➡️ 𝑅𝑈𝐿𝐸𝑆 ✅ 𝐴𝑆𝐾 𝑏𝑜𝑡 ✅ 𝑏𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑡 ✅ 𝑀𝑃 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡

6 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC60 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @gachilockNETPhoto

⭐️ ⭐️ 👑 𝗕𝗹𝘂𝗲 𝗟𝗼𝗰𝗸✨🌟 🤩🌩🌩🌩🌩 🤩🤩 🌩🌩🌩🌩 💣 𝗚𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗮𝗸𝘂𝘁𝗮✨ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 🤩 🤩🔠 МОЖЕТ, ВСЕ ВМЕСТЕ ??? 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 Сетка, в которой персонажи Blue Lock живут в жестоком мире Гачиакуты 🤩 Кем будет ваш персонаж: уборщиком, вандалом или гвардейцем? Как

6 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC96 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @MegurubachirayooPhoto

🌼𝙸) 𝚈𝙾𝚄'𝚁𝙴 𝙾𝙽 🌼 🌼 🌼 🌼 🌼 🌼 🌼 𝙾𝙵𝙵𝙸𝙲𝙸𝙰𝙻 𝙲𝙷𝙰𝙽𝙽𝙴𝙻))🐝 🌟 ԿТ𐌏 ВА𑀝 ТУТ ЖДЁТ??? 🌟 • ДРА𐌺И • 𐌑𐌏И 𐌑Ы𑀝𐌡И • 𑀝𐌿𐌏РЫ • 𐌑𐌏И 𐋏АБ𐌡ЮДЕ𐋏ИЯ • 𐌑𐌏И БУД𐋏И Залетай!

4 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTC203 views35 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026

и почему я вообще спрашиваю.

❤‍🔥17😭7💯5custom 53980516665513973713custom 53999426160977766922🍓1

4 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC202 views32 reactions3 Starsread 6 August 2026

ты идиот?

custom 539994261609777669221💯4❤‍🔥2😭2🍓1💘1custom 53980516665513973711

4 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC225 views32 reactions3 Starsread 6 August 2026

пол десятого вечера. почему я в своём номере на 17 этаже слышу звуки щелчков камеры.

custom 539805166655139737120🍓5😍31💘1😭1custom 53957637546526856381

4 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC225 views46 reactions3 Starsread 6 August 2026

у меня складывается ощущение, что Ноа, Несс и журналисты играют в камень ножницы бумагу, чтобы проигравший раздражал меня весь оставшийся день.

🍓27custom 53957637546526856388custom 53980516665513973718❤‍🔥1💘1😭1

27 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC546 views62 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026

какая же скукотень. один матч унылее другого. по скорее бы в финал.

custom 539805166655139737138❤‍🔥86😍3😭2🍓1💘1💯1

24 Jul 2026, 11:34 UTC627 views29 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 539805166655139737116❤‍🔥6🔥5🍓1custom 53999426160977766921

19 Jul 2026, 16:30 UTC789 views69 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

он думает, если он отвернулся сфотографировать дерево, то я пройду мимо? клоунишка за время чемпионата, видимо, бессмертным стал.

💯38custom 529851505643725831616custom 53999426160977766929🍓2💘2😍1custom 53980516665513973711

19 Jul 2026, 16:13 UTC630 views32 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026

хочется раздавить что-нибудь, как же раздражает.

💘20custom 53980516665513973716💯2🔥2🍓1😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @michaelkaiser_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ᴍɪᴄʜᴀᴇʟ ᴋᴀɪꜱᴇʀ🌹” (@michaelkaiser_official), 630 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/michaelkaiser_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.