Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 3D Game Models

Channel

3D Game Models

@CG_Game_Models

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

24,651subscribers

+269 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001208664860
TypeChannel
Username@CG_Game_Models
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held19
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CG_Game_Models

Growth

24,38224,65124,516.56 August 2026 — 24,382 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,382 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,384 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,397 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,401 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,412 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,420 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,446 subscribers13 August 2026 — 24,457 subscribers14 August 2026 — 24,486 subscribers16 August 2026 — 24,536 subscribers17 August 2026 — 24,558 subscribers18 August 2026 — 24,571 subscribers19 August 2026 — 24,587 subscribers20 August 2026 — 24,602 subscribers21 August 2026 — 24,614 subscribers22 August 2026 — 24,633 subscribers24 August 2026 — 24,643 subscribers25 August 2026 — 24,651 subscribers6 August 202625 August 2026
19 measurements spanning 19 days, net +269. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,342–24,691 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 12:1424,651+8
24 Aug 2026, 09:5524,643+10
22 Aug 2026, 20:0824,633+19
21 Aug 2026, 08:4424,614+12
20 Aug 2026, 10:3324,602+15
19 Aug 2026, 07:2424,587+16
18 Aug 2026, 10:3624,571+13
17 Aug 2026, 12:3524,558+22
16 Aug 2026, 02:5424,536+50
14 Aug 2026, 13:4624,486+29
13 Aug 2026, 00:5824,457+11
12 Aug 2026, 00:0424,446+26
10 Aug 2026, 21:4824,420+8
10 Aug 2026, 00:2924,412+11
9 Aug 2026, 00:5224,401+4
8 Aug 2026, 00:0324,397+13
6 Aug 2026, 23:0124,384+2
6 Aug 2026, 22:1524,382no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:0324,382first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.1%
avg views ÷ 24,651 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,470
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.067%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held17 (28 July 202623 August 2026)
Views total58,942
Reactions total34
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1544.1%
🔥1235.3%
👍720.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC992 viewsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @GameDevUEPhoto

10x Unreal Engine Assets Pack Assets Pack includes: Roman Street Environment Roman Swimming Pool Environment Witch Village Environment Winter Base Wind Temple Will’s Room Environment Ruined Crypt Pure Nature – Meadows Rocky Desert Ocean Floor Pack – High Quality Environment Preview/Info/Demo/Download: https://desirefx.me/3d_models/10x-unreal-engine-assets-pack/

5 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC≈3,780 views2 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Mumbai Kali peeli Taxi CG Fabric | 3D Game Models

2

4 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC≈3,700 views2 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Sophie from Spiraling Witch Encyclopedia 3D Character CG Fabric | 3D Game Models

2

3 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC≈3,410 views7 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Arachnid Warrior Realtime Fan Art CG Fabric | 3D Game Models

👍4🔥3

2 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC≈3,580 views2 reactionsread 25 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

1🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC≈3,440 views2 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Stryker M1126 infantry transporter CG Fabric | 3D Game Models

1🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 08:16 UTC≈3,750 views1 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Douglas AC-47 Spooky Gunship CG Fabric | 3D Game Models

🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @CG_Game_Models. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,471,671 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

3dsky
@free_3dsky · 101,801
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 15 August 2026
GFX FATHER™
@graphicsfather · 68,680
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 20 August 2026
CGPeers
@Cg_peers · 68,665
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 20 August 2026
CG Persia
@CGPERS · 77,915
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 19 August 2026
3D STL Print Model
@STL_Print · 75,686
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 19 August 2026
3D Model for you!
@DesireFX_me · 76,782
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 19 August 2026
3Dsky Black Collection 🌑
@my_3dsky · 106,471
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 15 August 2026
3D SPACE ️️
@all_3dsky · 50,698
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 25 August 2026
Free 3D MODELS
@Free3dmodels · 94,535
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“3D Game Models” (@CG_Game_Models), 24,651 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CG_Game_Models.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.