Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net -3,513. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 315β6,869 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 14:45
2,600
-60
3 Nov 2026, 19:59
2,660
-435
31 Oct 2026, 15:11
3,095
-805
28 Oct 2026, 08:38
3,900
+2,829
25 Oct 2026, 12:28
1,071
-27
22 Oct 2026, 17:39
1,098
-8
19 Oct 2026, 23:41
1,106
-4
17 Oct 2026, 09:46
1,110
-71
14 Oct 2026, 19:18
1,181
-16
11 Oct 2026, 06:38
1,197
-167
5 Oct 2026, 02:38
1,364
-83
26 Sept 2026, 02:40
1,447
-196
17 Sept 2026, 10:59
1,643
-175
13 Sept 2026, 14:37
1,818
-403
9 Sept 2026, 14:02
2,221
-196
4 Sept 2026, 08:56
2,417
-173
31 Aug 2026, 18:16
2,590
-196
28 Aug 2026, 07:54
2,786
-73
24 Aug 2026, 23:05
2,859
-215
21 Aug 2026, 08:17
3,074
first reading
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 36 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
408 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
π
93
22.8%
β€
91
22.3%
π₯
82
20.1%
π
75
18.4%
π
66
16.2%
π
1
0.245%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 408 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The announcement of the token approaches like the moon behind the clouds; soon, a gathering for two hours shall occur, provided the core developers bow in agreement to the negotiations first (for what is a project without the harmony of its builders?). ππ£οΈπ€
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @CHADTOSHiHOMIE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @CHADTOSHiHOMIE as deleted β posts this register held that were missing from the channelβs public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelβs public page, and when β not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
8.0 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@CHADTOSHiHOMIE named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant β a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@trendingsevents named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 β 8 August 2026 Β· confirmed gone 27 October 2026 (two independent sightings β see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βCHADTOSHi π½β (@CHADTOSHiHOMIE), 2,600 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CHADTOSHiHOMIE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.