Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مُسْلِمَةٌ

Channel

مُسْلِمَةٌ

@C_TARAKI

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,238subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001349659380
TypeChannel
Username@C_TARAKI
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/C_TARAKI

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,2324,2554,243.528 August 2026 — 4,239 subscribers28 August 2026 — 4,243 subscribers31 August 2026 — 4,255 subscribers4 September 2026 — 4,245 subscribers9 September 2026 — 4,244 subscribers13 September 2026 — 4,232 subscribers17 September 2026 — 4,238 subscribers4,23828 August 202617 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 21 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,229–4,258 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 18:014,238+6
13 Sept 2026, 11:404,232-12
9 Sept 2026, 10:014,244-1
4 Sept 2026, 05:194,245-10
31 Aug 2026, 10:134,255+12
28 Aug 2026, 16:224,243+4
28 Aug 2026, 03:314,239first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.70%
avg views ÷ 4,238 subscribers
Avg views / post
242
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
9
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held20 (14 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total2,174
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 03:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 01:52 UTC61 viewsread 28 August 2026

تذكير بسُنَّة نبويَّة💙 ‏كان نبينا ﷺ يصلي فجر يوم الجمعة بسورتي السجدة والإنسان. ‏وأجاز الشيخ ابن عثيمين رحمه الله: فتح المصحف في فجر الجمعة ليصلي بهما من لا يحفظهما.

27 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC100 viewsread 28 August 2026

إذا أردت أن تتأثر بكلام الله ﷻ: ابتعد عن المعاصي ثم أصلح قلبك..

26 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC124 viewsread 28 August 2026

﴿لَنْ يُصِيبَنَا إِلَّا مَا كَتَبَ اللَّهُ لَنَا﴾، قال: «لنا» ولم يقل: «علينا»؛ لأن المصيبة خيرٌ لك، وليست عليك، فقل: الحمد لله. ✱ المصدر: وقفات مصحف الحفظ الميسر.

25 Aug 2026, 22:19 UTC152 viewsread 28 August 2026

لماذا جاء في القرآن الكريم قوله تعالى: ﴿قُلْ لَنْ يُصِيبَنَا إِلَّا مَا كَتَبَ اللَّهُ لَنَا هُوَ مَوْلَانَا﴾، ولم يقل: «علينا»؟ #سؤال_للتدبر

24 Aug 2026, 22:20 UTC533 viewsread 28 August 2026

انشروها في: حالاتكم قنواتكم حساباتكم ستورياتكم بالمجموعات كل مكان..

24 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC603 viewsread 28 August 2026

الاحتفال بالمولد النبوي بدعة لا أصل لها. الاحتفال بالمولد النبوي بدعة لا أصل لها. الاحتفال بالمولد النبوي بدعة لا أصل لها. لو كان في الاحتفال بالمولد خيرٌ وفضلٌ لسبقنا إليه الصحابة والتابعون، لكنه لا أصل له؛ فهو بدعة، وكل بدعة ضلالة، وكل ضلالة في النار. وزيادة على ذلك، لا يُعلم يوم مولد النبي ﷺ على وجهٍ ثابت، ولو قيل إنه وُلد في ١٢ ربيع الأول، فقد قيل أيضًا بالإجماع إنه توفي في ١٢ ربيع الأول، فكيف تحتفلون في يومٍ م

23 Aug 2026, 22:41 UTC262 viewsread 28 August 2026

خلاصة محرّرة في حكم الاحتفال بمولد النبي ﷺ! قال شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية رحمه الله حين سئل عنه: لم يَسُنّ ذلك رسول الله ﷺ ولا أحد من خلفائه الراشدين، ولا فعله أحد من الصحابة والتابعين لهم بإحسان، ولا ذكَر أنه مستحب أحدٌ من أئمة المسلمين المذكورين ولا غيرهم، ولا روي في فضل ذلك شيء من الأحاديث والآثار، ولا كان معروفًا في السلف. فأما الاجتماع على غناء ورقص ونحو ذلك، واتخاذه عبادة، فلا يرتاب أحد من أهل العلم والإيمان أن ه

22 Aug 2026, 22:39 UTC233 viewsread 28 August 2026

والله لو علموا قبيح سريرتي لأبى السلام علي من يلقاني

22 Aug 2026, 21:29 UTC309 viewsread 28 August 2026

إلى من قدَّر الله له قراءة هذه المقالة، أحسب أن الله أراد بك خيرًا؛ فخذ من وقتك دقائق واقرأ بتمعُّن، فإني ناصحك نصيحةً لئن أخذت بها -والذي نفسي بيده- ليفتحنَّ الله عليك بركاتٍ من السماء والأرض، وليُغدقنَّ عليك من خيري الدنيا والآخرة، ولَيُرضينَّك ولَيُكرمنَّك، وهو أكرم الأكرمين. أقول لك: اجعل حياتك ممزوجةً بالقرآن، لا تنفك عنه؛ تلاوةٌ دائمة، من المصحف أو من حفظك، واستماعٌ دائم في غير وقت التلاوة. خصِّص له وقتًا، واس

20 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC503 viewsread 28 August 2026

ما أكثر عبدٌ من الصلاة والسلام على رسول الله ﷺ إلا كفاه الله همَّه، وغفر له ذنبه، وشرح صدره، وضاعف له الأجر والجزاء؛ فمن صلى عليه صلاةً = صلى الله عليه بها عشرًا، وحطَّ عنه عشر خطيئات، ورفع له عشر درجات! ‏فأكثروا من الصلاة والسلام على رسول الله ﷺ.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @C_TARAKI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

عَـوْن
@x4wa1 · 27,792
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مُسْلِمَةٌ” (@C_TARAKI), 4,238 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/C_TARAKI.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.