Call of Midas pinned a photo

Channel
Call of Midas
@CallOfMidas
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
11,186subscribers
-2,952 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002311723261 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CallOfMidas |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 41 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CallOfMidas |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:28 | 11,186 | -230 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 17:59 | 11,416 | -232 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:04 | 11,648 | -116 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:06 | 11,764 | -88 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:37 | 11,852 | -285 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 17:09 | 12,137 | -99 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 20:35 | 12,236 | -141 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 23:18 | 12,377 | -189 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 14:26 | 12,566 | -619 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 16:21 | 13,185 | -505 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 11:17 | 13,690 | -322 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 07:40 | 14,012 | -16 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 14,028 | -3 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 14,031 | -7 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 14,038 | -4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 14,042 | -8 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 14,050 | -4 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:14 | 14,054 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:37 | 14,057 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 14,059 | first reading |
Engagement
100 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 100 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 49s
- Average length
- 6s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
The Robloxians 2.5X ✅ 150k ➡️ 380k Good launch, as i said don't fade this team, they are based🔥 https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x3280b21b63df584e8d4afb8cabd0e031eca1b4f13d64fb06456867b35fd01e0
🆕 | ROBLOXIANS BUY! by @MajorBuyBot 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🤑 🔷 RBLX 49.109 ($1984.58) 🪙 ROBLOXIANS 6,562,188.954 (Tx) 🔎 Position: New Holder! (Wallet) 📈 MCap: $302,427 📣 Socials: 𝗧𝗴 🦅🦅🦅🦅⚡️𝟭𝟬𝟬 📊 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗿𝘁👍 𝗩𝗼𝘁𝗲 💲 𝗕𝘂𝘆
🆕 | ROBLOXIANS BUY! by @MajorBuyBot 🎩 🔷 RBLX 2.184 ($88.17) 🪙 ROBLOXIANS 512,565.858 (Tx) 🔎 Position: New Holder! (Wallet) 📈 MCap: $172,017 📣 Socials: 𝗧𝗴 🦅🦅🦅🦅⚡️𝟭𝟬𝟬 📊 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗿𝘁👍 𝗩𝗼𝘁𝗲 💲 𝗕𝘂𝘆
The Robloxians Check out this project, it’s looking like it’s got some solid potential. Still early, but the team’s strong and the community’s growing. MCap: 150k 0xb528a38ea684ed26ea0eee9de5d222da6228c10d https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x3280b21b63df584e8d4afb8cabd0e031eca1b4f13d64fb06456867b35fd01e0 https://t.me/robloxianscult Not financial advice, but worth checking out. do your own
🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕 $736 LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL BUY! 🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔 ➡️ NVDA: 3.38 ($736) ⬅️ LLM: 2.7M 👤 Buyer / Txn 🅿️ Position: NEW 📈 Marketcap: $268K 📊Chart | 🕵️ Calls |🏆 Trending
🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕 $170 LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL BUY! 🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔 ➡️ NVDA: 0.78 ($170) ⬅️ LLM: 928K 👤 Buyer / Txn 🅿️ Position: NEW 📈 Marketcap: $183K 📊Chart | 🕵️ Calls |🏆 Trending
Large Language Model Check out this project, it’s looking like it’s got some solid potential. Still early, but the team’s strong and the community’s growing. MCap: 150k 0x334796c7a865892654e5d987756b1f9078b7b904 https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xc53ff5484c1bf03d274e36fca3517be4261c4a9289756ad0c39fc6593cd43380 https://t.me/LLMmeme Not financial advice, but worth checking out. do your own
Call of Midas pinned a photo
HE HUA 3.5X plus ✅ 160k ➡️ 570🔥 Narrative keeps getting stronger. The community continues to grow. The team never stops building. This looks very promising. 🔥 https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xc702caB4697099b28d8dfA7B5Fb4805733E92f1d
🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋 $2.5K HE HUA BUY! 🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼🐼 ➡️ WETH: 1 ($2.5K) ⬅️ HUAHUA: 6.2T 👤 Buyer / Txn 🅿️ Position: +129% 💵 Wallet Value: $53K 👛 Notable Holdings: Cash Cat ($19K), Ethereum ($14K), ROBINCAT ($9.8K) 📈 Marketcap: $437K 📊Chart | 🕵️ Calls |🏆 Trending
$HuaHua New Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 💵 0.404 ETH ($993.62) 👤 Tx | Hash 🆕 New Holder! 📊 MC: $300.76K 📢 Ads: Launch your token here Robinfun.live , free Dex update ✅️
Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @CallOfMidas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@spydefi · 42,17017 postsCHEESE HEAD 𝓜𝓪𝓽𝓽 𝓕𝓾𝓻𝓲𝓮
@CheeseHeadMattFurie · 657 posts@ETHTRENDING (LIVE)
@ETHTRENDING · 42,4015 postsCrest Trending | Robinhood
@CrestTrending · 1,3354 postsMajor Buy Bot | @MajorBuyBot
@MajorBuyBot · 40,2804 poststrendingsevents
@trendingsevents · 244 postsSOL TRENDING
@trendingssol · 134,5294 postsAccuren Portal
@accuren · 353 postsMaestro
@maestro · 36,0743 postsorangecoinonsol
@OrangeCoinOnSOL · 203 postsSkeleton Trending
@skeletontrend · 39,4233 postswencatrh
@WenCatRH · 13 postsCheesehead BSC portal
@Cheeseheadbsc · 6262 postsHe Hua Panda - Entry
@hehuapanda · 2552 postsMochi portal
@mochicat_sol · 882 postsBaby Shib Portal
@BabyShibToken · 1831 postKIRBY - Portal
@Kirby_Robinhood · 731 postLandwolf on Hood
@landwolfinhood · 471 postLLM CTO ( large language model )
@llmmeme · 21 postRobinhood Trending
@robinhood_trending · 4,3621 postSafevano Channel
@safevanowallet · 5,6781 postSAITAMA IN HOOD | PORTAL
@saitamainhood · 1851 post@TRENDING (ETH / SOL)
@trending · 463,6681 postWojak Portal
@wojak_rh · 4181 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 3
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@CallOfMidas named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026 · confirmed gone 8 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 31 August 2026 – 31 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026 · confirmed gone 6 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Call of Midas” (@CallOfMidas), 11,186 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CallOfMidas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.