INFY 47.25 high

Channel
๐ง๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ฆ
@Call_Technical
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
52,647subscribers
-1,825 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 31,623โ100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001101161340 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Call_Technical |
| Description | This channel shares stock market insights for educational purposes only. We do not offer financial advice or guaranteed returns. Please consult a certified advisor before making investment We operate as team Contact us here - https://t.me/technical486z |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 31 August 2019โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 20 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Call_Technical |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 52,647 | -72 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 52,719 | -156 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 52,875 | -29 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:22 | 52,904 | -722 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 53,626 | -126 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 53,752 | -44 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 53,796 | -15 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 53,811 | -69 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 53,880 | -82 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 53,962 | -120 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 54,082 | -117 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 54,199 | -73 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 54,272 | -7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 54,279 | -50 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 54,329 | -54 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 54,383 | -37 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 54,420 | -37 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:40 | 54,457 | -15 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 54,472 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 54,472 | first reading |
Engagement
49 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR ยท 30 days
- 7.08%
- avg views รท 52,647 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,730
- 38 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- โ
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 38
- of 49 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 49 (17 July 2026 โ 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 141,645 |
| Reactions total | โ |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 12
- Links
- 8
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 28 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
#StockOption Option INFY PE - 1140 Buy from 41.50 Target 48/55/64+ #StockOption This is not investment advice. Shared for learning purposes only.
ICICIPRULI 507.60 low
ICICIPRULI 510 low
#StockFuture Future sell ICICIPRULI Sep. Sell from 511 Target 506/500/492+ #StockFuture This is not investment advice. Shared for learning purposes only.
MCX high 228.60
https://t.me/m/on9VRvRrNDY1 https://t.me/m/on9VRvRrNDY1 Contact us for join premium๐ For daily sureshoot calls
https://t.me/m/on9VRvRrNDY1 https://t.me/m/on9VRvRrNDY1 Contact us for join premium๐ For daily sureshoot calls
MCX high 170 Reached 3rd target ๐
MCX high 129.95 2nd target reached๐
MCX touched 103 Reached target๐
#StockOption Option MCX CE - 3050 Buy from 85 Target 100/116/132+ #StockOption This is not investment advice. Shared for learning purposes only.
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @Call_Technical. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@technicalcashperformance ยท 9442 posts๐ง๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ฆ (future performance)
@technicalFuturePerformance ยท 6052 posts๐ง๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ฆ (option performance)
@technicaloptionperformance ยท 1,0262 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegramโs own answer, not this registerโs.When this register asks Telegramโs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@technicalcashperformance ยท 944#1
@technicalFuturePerformance ยท 605#2
@sureshotintrajackpottrades ยท 6,171#3
@Future_Option_Stocks_Trading ยท 2,785#4
@rocket_btst ยท 9,152#5
@MONEYVIEWSIN ยท 54,277#6
@technicaloptionperformance ยท 1,026#7
@CNBC_Aa ยท 5,549#8
@optionsdaily ยท 316#9
@stocktrader1 ยท 2,684 (as read 26 August 2026)#10
@FNOallinONE ยท 1,578#11
@rg767equityandmcx ยท 4,750#12
@Call_put_option_learn ยท 7,272#13
@ROMAN_VIEW ยท 1,412#14
@motilaloswalofficial ยท 201,077#15
@AUKTEK ยท 2,354#16
@traderzone12 ยท 580#17
@zillioncapital ยท 1,751 (as read 26 August 2026)#18
@SRDAryanDubey ยท 2,546#19
@naaga ยท 568#20
@stocksndividendupdates ยท 3,417#21
@marketsupportedu ยท 3,628#22
@TraderInvestor ยท 12,157#23
@everydayprofit95 ยท 7,280#24
@TheSachinTrades ยท 1,892#25
@Intradayoptions11 ยท 1,162#26
@stockmarketupdatesmw ยท 42,832#27
@mastermindforu ยท 6,035#28
@stockproconsultancyservices ยท 700#29
@Trade_with_engineer09 ยท 25,922#30
@tradewithlogic619 ยท 29,474#31
@niftystudy23 ยท 1,065#32
@stockpro_online ยท 267,945#33
@Mr_p_lnvestment1 ยท 15,590#34
@Official_AngelOne ยท 311,131#35
@OptionsScalping ยท 29,501#36
@FinanceWithSunil ยท 92,405#37
@iofshindiVikashGupta ยท 2,042 (as read 26 August 2026)#38
@asitbaranofficial ยท 6,484#39
@shortterm07 ยท 57,303#40
@multibaggerworld ยท 2,236#41
@indextradingnitin ยท 201,584#42
@InsidersInsight02 ยท 3,130#43
@moneycontrolcom ยท 238,844#44
@TredingView_Membership ยท 8,151#45
@AngelOneAdvisory ยท 330,429#46
@harshrayyy ยท 2,172#47
@CANOTEHUB ยท 12,705#48
@Livemcxstocknews ยท 585#49
@accurateoptions100 ยท 21,942#50
@structuralengineeringandCotm ยท 3,631#51
@ICT_Capitals ยท 17,369#52
@Traders_Hive ยท 8,514#53
@Dharmagyanjaishreeram ยท 877#54
@Roy_Predictions ยท 4,956#55
@Zemoafricaiplfixer ยท 2,887#56
@IntradayGeeks_Review ยท 1,214#57
@FreeTradingSoftwaree ยท 12,176#58
@cointurknews ยท 957#59
@Phantomfx_2024 ยท 9,709#60
Read from Telegramโs recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@MONEYVIEWSIN ยท 54,277
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 70 here โ alongside 69 others โ read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ง๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ฆโ (@Call_Technical), 52,647 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Call_Technical.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.