🟩 BUY SOLARISIND 21500 CE - @ 650 ₹50,000 + profit running..... Join fast, free for first 50 subscribrs only🚴三👇 https://t.me/+jEMIJRSoUqAzMmNl https://t.me/+jEMIJRSoUqAzMmNl https://t.me/+jEMIJRSoUqAzMmNl https://t.me/+jEMIJRSoUqAzMmNl https://t.me/+jEMIJRSoUqAzMmNl https://t.me/+jEMIJRSoUqAzMmNl https://t.me/+jEMIJRSoUqAzMmNl

Channel
Accurate Options💯
@accurateoptions100
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,855subscribers
-194 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001471370127 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @accurateoptions100 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/accurateoptions100 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 21,855 | -41 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 21,896 | -17 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 21,913 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:44 | 21,917 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:29 | 21,914 | -16 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 21,930 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 21,934 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 21,940 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:44 | 21,942 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 21,950 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 21,948 | -18 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 21,966 | -20 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 21,986 | -7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 21,993 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 21,996 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 21,992 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 21,995 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 22,001 | -11 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 22,012 | -9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 22,021 | first reading |
Engagement
446 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.42%
- avg views ÷ 21,855 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 965
- 369 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 385
- of 446 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 446 (6 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 356,117 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 13:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 24s
- Average length
- 8s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
https://t.me/navkarrresearch इंट्राडे ऑप्शन ट्रेडिंग की सबसे बेस्ट चैनल Best channel for intraday option trading https://t.me/navkarrresearch https://t.me/navkarrresearch https://t.me/navkarrresearch
Sticker, posted without a caption
Ok Sir....Main Aapko paid Group ka link De Raha hu aap 1 week Isme hamara Free Call Dekho agar profit Toh Hi pay karna Lekin Ye Link Kisi Ko Shere mat karna https://t.me/+H3Ch-tuENlczNGU1
BIGGEST SEPT OFFER IS LIVE ➡️➡️➡️ 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠 ➖Intraday Stock option ➖Positional stock option ➖BTST stock option PING NOW TO JOIN ⚠️ @ACCURATE_OPTIONSADMIN PAYMENT LINK https://cosmofeed.com/vig/69141598dc37d3001344e89d
TATAPOWER NEW HIGH 8.9😍😍
TATAPOWER NEW HIGH 8.8😍😍
TATAPOWER NEW HIGH 8.75😍😍
TATAPOWER NEW HIGH 8.6😍😍
TATAPOWER NEW HIGH 8.5😍😍
BUY TATAPOWER 370 CE ABV 8.3 TGT SL PAID TRADE WITH 3-4 LOTS NOTE : REVIEW RISK DISCLOSURES AT WWW.MNCRESEARCH.COM TO AVOID CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
BUY SEP BUY AT@ 500 CE BIG MASSIVE JACKPOTTT JSWENERGY BUY CMP &30 N INTRA DAYS HIGH CLOSINGGG& BIGGGG REALLY MORE RUNNING JACKPOT &38700 ABV LIVE GAINS NEXT JACKPOT POST TOMORROW MORNING 9.30 AM JOIN BELOW LINK https://t.me/+SL0-yJqOD1PHiPcl https://t.me/+SL0-yJqOD1PHiPcl https://t.me/+SL0-yJqOD1PHiPcl https://t.me/+SL0-yJqOD1PHiPcl https://t.me/+SL0-yJqOD1PHiPcl
Showing the 12 most recent of 446 posts we hold for @accurateoptions100. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@NG_NATURALGAS_MCX_GAS · 123,403
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 21 August 2026
@DKTECHNICALS · 28,074
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 September 2026
@themarketguru29 · 41,304
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 29 August 2026
@OptionsTrading_Stocks_Index · 39,031
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
@mcx_comodity_crude_oil_calls · 63,826
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 24 August 2026
@Call_Technical · 43,592
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 August 2026
@primetechnical · 71,306
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 August 2026
@mcx_commodity_crude_oil_silvers · 129,576
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 21 August 2026
@agsebiranalyst · 37,376
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
@TradeOps_Intraday_Options_Nifty · 124,349
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Accurate Options💯” (@accurateoptions100), 21,855 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/accurateoptions100.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.