+7,125/- RUNNING AS PER HIGH #AXISBANK #CALLOPTIONS 🤑🤑🤑 MARGIN CAPITAL PER LOT 8.4K ✅

Channel
STOCK F&O
@Stock_Futures_Options_Official07
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,725subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001337808034 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Stock_Futures_Options_Official07 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Stock_Futures_Options_Official07 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 17,725 | -1 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 17,726 | -9 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 17,735 | +25 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:37 | 17,710 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:55 | 17,712 | +8 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 14:16 | 17,704 | -32 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 17,736 | +6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 07:03 | 17,730 | +14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:35 | 17,716 | +6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 17,710 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 17,720 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 17,731 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 17,733 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 17,740 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 17,744 | +7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 17,737 | +12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 17,725 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 17,726 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:56 | 17,725 | -13 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 17,738 | first reading |
Engagement
270 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.65%
- avg views ÷ 17,725 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,180
- 149 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 150
- of 270 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 270 (13 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 175,753 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
AXISBANK NEW HIGH 15.40 🚀 #ONEWAY
AXISBANK NEW HIGH 15.20 🚀 #ONEWAY
AXISBANK NEW HIGH 15.00 🚀 #ONEWAY
AXISBANK NEW HIGH 14.80 🚀
AXISBANK NEW HIGH 14.50 🚀
AXISBANK NEW HIGH 14.25 🚀
AXISBANK NEW HIGH 14.00 🚀
AXISBANK NEW HIGH 13.75 🚀
OPTIONS BUY AXISBANK 1300 CE AT CMP 13.50 TGT OPEN 5 TO 6 LOT
🌅 GOOD MORNING, CHAMPIONS! 🏆 📊 Today’s Stock Options Trial Calls Will Be Shared Live For Watching! ⏰ Stay Alert. 🔔 UNMUTE Notifications 📌 PIN Our Channel ⚠️ Disclaimer "Investments in securities are subject to market risks. Trading involves risk."
SETUPS WILL NOW BE ONLY SHARED INSIDE PREMIUM CHANNEL "SEPT SERIES" START TODAY 📈 ✅ Early Trade Entries ✅ Proper SL And Targets ✅ Expert Market Support INTERESTED TO JOIN OUR PREMIUM MEMBERSHIP 💳 "PAYMENT LINK (DISCOUNT FOR LIMITED MEMBERS)" :- https://cosmofeed.com/vig/67a08cce9ae0d20013ea886f ADDED AUTOMATICALLY IN PREMIUM CHANNEL AFTER PAYMENT https://cosmofeed.com/vig/67a08cce9ae0d20013ea886f
Showing the 12 most recent of 270 posts we hold for @Stock_Futures_Options_Official07. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Futures_Options_Official · 24,704
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026
@TechnicalTrade_Official01 · 24,624
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 September 2026
@Trade_with_engineer09 · 25,765
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 September 2026
@stock_nifty_options · 43,541
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 28 August 2026
@mcx_commodity_crude_oil_silvers · 129,163
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 21 August 2026
@OptionsTrading_Stocks_Index · 38,878
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
@upmazing · 25,661
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 September 2026
@DKTECHNICALS · 28,094
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 September 2026
@nkstradingvpcsekhar · 24,618
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 September 2026
@bullss · 110,828
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“STOCK F&O” (@Stock_Futures_Options_Official07), 17,725 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Stock_Futures_Options_Official07.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.