Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cardiology Updates

Channel

Cardiology Updates

@Cardiology_Updates

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,373subscribers

+448 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001448704621
TypeChannel
Username@Cardiology_Updates
DescriptionAll the atest articles, research and news from worlds leading Cardiology Journals. Discussion group https://t.me/Professional_Medical_Discussion
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Cardiology_Updates

Growth

18,92519,37319,1496 August 2026 — 18,925 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,926 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,945 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,964 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,988 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,005 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,042 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,068 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,094 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,129 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,151 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,166 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,188 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,204 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,231 subscribers23 August 2026 — 19,288 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,300 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,316 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,347 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,352 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,373 subscribers6 August 202629 August 2026
21 measurements spanning 22 days, net +448. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,858–19,440 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 06:5719,373+21
28 Aug 2026, 08:5419,352+5
27 Aug 2026, 10:0719,347+31
26 Aug 2026, 06:4319,316+16
25 Aug 2026, 04:1419,300+12
23 Aug 2026, 20:5319,288+57
22 Aug 2026, 02:0519,231+27
20 Aug 2026, 19:3319,204+16
19 Aug 2026, 21:1219,188+22
18 Aug 2026, 18:3719,166+15
17 Aug 2026, 19:1519,151+22
16 Aug 2026, 14:1819,129+35
14 Aug 2026, 18:2219,094+26
13 Aug 2026, 05:5919,068+26
12 Aug 2026, 07:5819,042+37
11 Aug 2026, 04:4119,005+17
10 Aug 2026, 02:1118,988+24
9 Aug 2026, 05:0218,964+19
8 Aug 2026, 06:4318,945+19
7 Aug 2026, 05:4018,926first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.7%
avg views ÷ 19,373 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,070
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.046%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held29 (26 June 202627 August 2026)
Views total24,796
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
110
Links
8,380

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2787.1%
👍39.68%
🙏13.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC831 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Dyslipidaemia and hepatic steatosis: mechanisms and implications for lipid-lowering therapy https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01336-1 Nature Reviews Cardiology, Published online: 27 August 2026; doi:10.1038/s41569-026-01336-1 (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01336-1)Dyslipidaemia and hepatic steatosis are interconnected disorders that contribute to the burden of cardiovascular disease. Understand

2

27 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC807 viewsread 29 August 2026

Reply to ‘Bedside epicardial adipose tissue assessment in the era of advanced adipose phenotyping’ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01343-2 Nature Reviews Cardiology, Published online: 27 August 2026; doi:10.1038/s41569-026-01343-2 (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01343-2)Reply to ‘Bedside epicardial adipose tissue assessment in the era of advanced adipose phenotyping’

27 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC768 views0 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Bedside epicardial adipose tissue assessment in the era of advanced adipose phenotyping https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01344-1 Nature Reviews Cardiology, Published online: 27 August 2026; doi:10.1038/s41569-026-01344-1 (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01344-1)Bedside epicardial adipose tissue assessment in the era of advanced adipose phenotyping

20 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC≈2,000 viewsread 29 August 2026

Nicotine-containing products and the cardiovascular system: mechanisms and global health implications https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01331-6 Nature Reviews Cardiology, Published online: 20 August 2026; doi:10.1038/s41569-026-01331-6 (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01331-6)In this Review, Münzel and colleagues discuss the available mechanistic, biomarker, preclinical and clinical data on the c

19 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC≈1,930 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Cardiovascular research in China: pathways, incentives and editorial implications https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01341-4 Nature Reviews Cardiology, Published online: 19 August 2026; doi:10.1038/s41569-026-01341-4 (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01341-4)The cardiovascular research landscape in China is shaped by a tiered, hospital-centred system, expanding funding opportunities and strong clin

1

18 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC≈1,930 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Cardiac fibroblast diversity in HFpEF: states, niches, interorgan drivers and targets https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01335-2 Nature Reviews Cardiology, Published online: 18 August 2026; doi:10.1038/s41569-026-01335-2 (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01335-2)Myocardial fibrosis is a key structural and prognostically adverse feature of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In t

1

18 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC≈1,770 viewsread 29 August 2026

Atherosclerotic plaque-derived microparticles as exporters of thrombotic risk https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01340-5 Nature Reviews Cardiology, Published online: 18 August 2026; doi:10.1038/s41569-026-01340-5 (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01340-5)Tipack Shanmugam discusses a study showing that microparticles released from atherosclerotic plaque can increase thrombotic risk and proposes that

11 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC≈2,670 viewsread 29 August 2026

Uncovering the role of chromatin organization and dynamics in heart disease https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01338-z Nature Reviews Cardiology, Published online: 11 August 2026; doi:10.1038/s41569-026-01338-z (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01338-z)Two studies published in Science explore how 3D chromatin organization and structure can influence cardiac development and promote heart failure.

11 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC≈2,480 viewsread 29 August 2026

The biomechanical environment of coronary atherosclerotic plaque rupture https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01337-0 Nature Reviews Cardiology, Published online: 11 August 2026; doi:10.1038/s41569-026-01337-0 (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01337-0)Tsiartas and Bennett discuss the discovery that atheroclerotic plaque vulnerability to rupture arises from the interaction between plaque composition a

6 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈3,370 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Haemolytic injury and cardiovascular disease https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01329-0 Nature Reviews Cardiology, Published online: 06 August 2026; doi:10.1038/s41569-026-01329-0 (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01329-0)Haemolysis, and the subsequent liberation of haemoglobin into the plasma, can induce haemodynamic dysregulation and cardiovascular injury. In this Review, Hieromnimon and colleagu

1👍1

3 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC≈3,370 views0 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Social determinants of cardiovascular health: lessons from Whitehall https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01333-4 Nature Reviews Cardiology, Published online: 03 August 2026; doi:10.1038/s41569-026-01333-4 (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01333-4)Benjamin Dowsing describes the Whitehall studies, which established the inverse relationship between socioeconomic status and the risk of death from corona

3 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC≈2,870 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Post-mitotic cardiomyocyte senescence redefines cardiac ageing https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01332-5 Nature Reviews Cardiology, Published online: 03 August 2026; doi:10.1038/s41569-026-01332-5 (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01332-5)Ilias Simon and Yohan Santin discuss the study that demonstrated that post-mitotic cardiomyocytes can acquire a senescent phenotype with age.

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @Cardiology_Updates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Clinical Practice guidelines
@ClinicalPharmGuideline · 60,007
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026
MBBS Materials by Dr MediRobot
@mbbsmaterials · 67,650
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 26 August 2026
UPDATES IN MEDICINE
@Updates_in_Medicine · 47,181
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 August 2026
Medical Books
@MedicalBooksStoreA · 41,705
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 29 August 2026
Internal Medicine Videos & books
@medicinevideoss · 103,386
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
Polite Doctor🩺
@skills_first · 42,172
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
Medinternafacil 🤓🩺
@medinternafacil · 61,799
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 August 2026
Biochemistry Videos & Books
@biochemistry_videos · 62,985
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 26 August 2026
Medical Notes( NINJA Nerd) 📝
@Notes_772 · 79,484
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 August 2026
PDFology
@PDFology · 67,046
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
Artículos médicos Twitter
@articulosmedicosdelMedtwitter · 51,810
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 August 2026
Osmosis
@osmosis_mogahed772 · 67,829
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cardiology Updates” (@Cardiology_Updates), 19,373 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cardiology_Updates.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.