Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RESPIRATORY Medicine / Pulmonology Updates

Channel

RESPIRATORY Medicine / Pulmonology Updates

@Respiratory_Updates

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,164subscribers

+77 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001195340764
TypeChannel
Username@Respiratory_Updates
Created4 June 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded22 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Respiratory_Updates

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,0875,1645,125.522 August 2026 — 5,087 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,087 subscribers23 August 2026 — 5,090 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,096 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,105 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,114 subscribers3 September 2026 — 5,118 subscribers8 September 2026 — 5,134 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,153 subscribers17 September 2026 — 5,164 subscribers22 August 202617 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 26 days, net +77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,075–5,176 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 08:195,164+11
13 Sept 2026, 02:205,153+19
8 Sept 2026, 19:575,134+16
3 Sept 2026, 21:385,118+4
31 Aug 2026, 20:255,114+9
29 Aug 2026, 02:355,105+9
25 Aug 2026, 22:345,096+6
23 Aug 2026, 04:355,090+3
22 Aug 2026, 14:455,087no change
22 Aug 2026, 14:305,087first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 03:54 UTC151 viewsread 22 August 2026

[Articles] Symptom burden to characterise, predict, and prevent asthma attacks: a patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials and translational prospective studies https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(26)00150-5/fulltext?rss=yes In a large, individual patient-level meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and translational prospective observational cohort studies, we observed lit

20 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC214 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026

[Spotlight] Breathing Space: “A love letter to breath” https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(26)00254-7/fulltext?rss=yes It has been nearly 10 years since Havi Carel's Spotlight in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine on breathlessness and the rift between objective measurement and subjective experience. Havi's phenomenological study of breathlessness for the Wellcome-funded medical humanities L

2

18 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC263 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026

[Articles] Mepolizumab effectiveness for patients with severe, uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in Italy (MEPOREAL): a real-life, multicentre, phase 4 trial https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(26)00197-9/fulltext?rss=yes Mepolizumab progressively improved outcomes during the first 12 months of treatment. Long-term, prospective studies are warranted to further elucidat

1

18 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC249 viewsread 22 August 2026

[Spotlight] Edinburgh Festival Fringe: “Cancer isn't pretty—and neither is opera” https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(26)00261-4/fulltext?rss=yes Cancer is often about numbers: the ups and downs of protein, hormone, or other tumour markers; the number of weeks of chemotherapy or radiotherapy that a patient must face; the number of months or years given as an estimated length of survival d

14 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC399 viewsread 22 August 2026

Effects of ambient air pollution exposure on lung function in cystic fibrosis: old stories or breaking news? http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/9/821?rss=1 Ambient air pollution has short- and long-term adverse effects on health and increases morbidity and mortality in the general population.1–3 The association between air pollution and health is complex. Fluctuating pollutant concentration levels, timing of

14 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC277 viewsread 22 August 2026

Global asthma and pest control: bugs and WASPs http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/9/834?rss=1 Asthma affects over 300 million people worldwide and is the most common chronic lung disease in children, causing major global morbidity and mortality reflected in its inclusion in the WHO Global Action Plan1 and the United Nations 2030 Agenda.2 Asthma is driven by a person’s genetic susceptibility and immune respon

14 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC209 viewsread 22 August 2026

Significance of diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide on chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/9/913?rss=1 Reduced diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLco) reflects microvasculopathy in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, yet its clinical value is uncertain. In a Japanese nationwide registry (2018–2023) we studied 1270 pati

14 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC202 viewsread 22 August 2026

Smoking cessation within lung cancer screening: how much more evidence is needed? http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/9/830?rss=1 Low-dose CT (LDCT) screening has transformed lung cancer outcomes by enabling earlier diagnosis and reducing mortality among individuals at high risk.1 2 As programmes expand internationally, their reach continues to grow. However, screening alone cannot address the primary cause o

14 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC153 viewsread 22 August 2026

Beyond detection: what happens after lung cancer screening matters more http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/9/832?rss=1 Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose CT (LDCT) aims to reduce lung cancer-related mortality.1 2 This benefit is achieved by detecting lung cancer at an asymptomatic, early stage, thereby enabling curative-intent treatments such as surgical resection or stereotactic radiotherapy. However

14 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC127 viewsread 22 August 2026

'Mind the gap http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/9/828?rss=1 Sleep and public health Sleep has been surrounded by mythical beliefs since ancient times. However, when it comes to an assessment of health, sleep has typically been neglected.1 With advances in technology in the 20th century, that led to our current understanding of sleep stages, came an increasing evidence base for sleep medicine. By now, it has

14 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC141 viewsread 22 August 2026

A long time ago, in an airway far, far away: early changes in the proximal airways in IPF and their response to drug treatment http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/9/825?rss=1 Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive fibrosing lung disease characterised by irreversible remodelling of the distal lung and loss of respiratory function. Current models centre alveolar epithelial progenitor dysfunction i

14 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC108 viewsread 22 August 2026

Creating certainty in uncertainty: improving spirometry interpretation http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/81/9/823?rss=1 For those of us writing pulmonary function reports, how many times have we been in the situation where the results are at, or just above, or just below, the lower limit of normal? Too often, the person writing the report must make a judgement with very limited information and then write a rep

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Respiratory_Updates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

UPDATES IN MEDICINE
@Updates_in_Medicine · 47,996
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 August 2026
NEJM (The New England Journal of Medicine)
@The_NEJM · 27,377
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
ICU and pulmonary medicine
@ahmedyasminc1 · 25,961
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 September 2026
doctor's notebook
@doctorsnotebooks · 24,746
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 September 2026
Internal Medicine - Medicina Interna
@loacro01 · 30,709
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
Medical Guidelines 2025_2026
@Mmmmmm221234 · 35,955
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 2 September 2026
THE WHITE ARMY
@whitearmyofmedicos · 103,962
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 August 2026
Medical USMLE
@kaplanusmles · 44,081
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
Hakimed: Medical Resources
@HakimApps_Guideline · 32,777
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
Al-Azhar Assiut Medical School
@AlAzharAssiutMedicalSchool · 26,268
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 September 2026
internal medicine
@easymedicine7 · 29,375
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
Boards and Beyond 2024
@Boards_Beyond_videos · 41,133
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
OnlineMedED Videos | USMLE Step 2 CK | 1
@USMLEOnlineMedED · 30,021
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
Internal Medicine Videos & books
@medicinevideoss · 102,991
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
Internal Medicine
@inter_first · 29,634
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 September 2026
Clinical Practice guidelines
@ClinicalPharmGuideline · 60,754
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RESPIRATORY Medicine / Pulmonology Updates” (@Respiratory_Updates), 5,164 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Respiratory_Updates.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.