Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CluvexStudio

Channel

CluvexStudio

@CluvexStudio

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

14,500subscribers

+1,108 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003010356472
TypeChannel
Username@CluvexStudio
Descriptionاینجا پروژه‌ها و تجربه‌های فنی‌ام (شبکه، برنامه‌نویسی) رو منتشر می‌کنم. :)) ☕ حمایت اختیاری: https://t.me/CluvexStudio/140
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CluvexStudio

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,39214,50013,9465 August 2026 — 13,392 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,392 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,426 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,475 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,498 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,524 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,555 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,566 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,592 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,620 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,687 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,773 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,781 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,808 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,028 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,152 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,247 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,343 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,387 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,393 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,403 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,431 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,447 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,500 subscribers5 August 202630 August 2026
24 measurements spanning 24 days, net +1,108. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,226–14,666 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 00:3414,500+53
28 Aug 2026, 23:0314,447+16
28 Aug 2026, 01:0414,431+28
27 Aug 2026, 02:4314,403+10
26 Aug 2026, 05:1714,393+6
25 Aug 2026, 04:2314,387+44
24 Aug 2026, 03:1514,343+96
22 Aug 2026, 12:3914,247+95
21 Aug 2026, 05:0414,152+124
20 Aug 2026, 08:0214,028+220
19 Aug 2026, 05:5613,808+27
18 Aug 2026, 07:5513,781+8
17 Aug 2026, 10:0513,773+86
15 Aug 2026, 16:1313,687+67
14 Aug 2026, 06:5313,620+28
12 Aug 2026, 20:4613,592+26
11 Aug 2026, 17:5113,566+11
10 Aug 2026, 15:1613,555+31
9 Aug 2026, 18:4313,524+26
8 Aug 2026, 18:0313,498first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
67.3%
avg views ÷ 14,500 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,760
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held25 (19 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total136,650
Reactions total3,181
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 05:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
50
Videos
1
Links
68

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

4,589 reactions across 25 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,54477.2%
👍4118.96%
🔥3858.39%
🕊1062.31%
❤‍🔥501.09%
👏290.632%
😍290.632%
🤝170.37%
70.153%
🎉50.109%
🏆40.087%
🙏20.044%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,589reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
111
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 25 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
79
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CluvexStudio. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 22:31 UTC≈3,160 views150 reactionsread 30 August 2026

جدیدا خیلیا می‌بینم که دانش شبکه‌ ای ندارن (اسم نمی‌برم) و اصلا نحوه کارکرد فایروال و DPI ایران رو هم خبر ندارن پروژه میزنن و به اسم خودشون ثبت میکنن و اسمی از وایب کد کردنشون نمیبرن. باید یه رسمی بین ما ایرانیا ترند بشه که هر پروژه وایب کدی حداقل بنویسه زیرش وایب کد شده (سر همین خیلی از چینیا هیت خوردیم) با اسباب‌بازیشون (Claude) صفر تا صد وایب کد میکنن و پروژه میزنن بدون اینکه ازش سر در بیارن قصد بی‌ احترامی نیست

128👍20🤝2

29 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC≈3,300 views169 reactionsread 30 August 2026

آپدیت جدید Aether v1.8.0: توی این آپدیت بیشتر روی پایداری و کرش‌ کار شده (بهتره آپدیت کنید. استیبل ترین ورژن‌هستش) کرش gool فیکس شد: اگه Gool رو انتخاب میکردید به محض اینکه یکی از دو تانل یا سرور socks متوقف میشد کل هسته کرش میکرد و بعدش هرچی reconnect میزدی بالا نمیومد (این رو یکی Contributor ها توی #91 فیکس کرد issue #87) /// تانل وایرگارد دیگه با یه panic از کار نمیوفته اگه یکی از تسک‌ های داخلی panic

162🔥6😍1

25 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC≈6,350 views579 reactions6 Starsread 30 August 2026

یه اپدیت میدم برای این Aether و اکثر مشکلات گزارش شده رو فیکس میکنم. + کلاینت هم براش زدم این مدت :)) اپدیتشو میدم وارپ داره + سایفون (کلاینت شناخته شده‌ست و از قبل بوده فقط الان Maintainer‌اش من شدم و قراره دسکتاپ و iOS هم منتشر کنم). --- یه پروژه دیگه هم توسعه دادم قبلا خیلی وقته ( نزدیک 6 ماه یا شایدم بیشتر کارش بود. توسعه‌اش دادم بلاخره )... تقریبا تمومه و باید یه داکیومنت تمیز و کامل براش بنویسم و منتشرش کنم

509🔥33👍24❤‍🔥5🏆4🕊4

18 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC≈12,700 views373 reactionsread 30 August 2026

آپدیت جدید Aether: توی این آپدیت روی مسیریابی (روتینگ) و اتصال از پشت پروکسی کار شده پروکسی بالادست :)) یا همون upstream اضافه شد اگه یه پروکسی دیگه روی سیستمتون اجراست میتونی Aether رو پشتش chain کنی: aether --upstream socks5://127.0.0.1:1080 با رمز: socks5://user:[email protected]:1080 روی هر سه حالت کار میکنه: مسک H3، مسک H2، وارپ و gool یه نکته بگم: H3 و وارپ و gool روی UDP هستن پس SOCKS5 لازم دارن که UDP associa

331👍31🕊5❤‍🔥3😍3

16 Aug 2026, 19:48 UTC≈11,600 views163 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @sohrabcontents

یک چندوقتیه درگیرم همونطور که می‌دونید کاراموزی و پروژه دانشگاه رو برداشتم و امروز برای یک کاری لازم شد تا یک سیستمی مثل شکن بالا بیارم که ترافیک رو از طریق dns برای یک سری سایت منتخب بتونه route کنه. خب حالت منطقیش اینه که شما یک ریزالور مثل dnsmasq بیارید بالا و یک چیزی مثل nginx بذارید جلوش ( به این روش میگن smart dns) که باهاش برای سایت‌های منتخبتون ترافیک رو فوروارد کنید. خب این برای DNS، DoH و DoT معقول و اوک

139👍14🔥6❤‍🔥4

10 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC≈12,600 views526 reactions13 Starsread 30 August 2026

وقت و تلاش های زیادی برای بهبود دسترسی مردم به اینترنت آزاد میشه. اگه واقعا پروژه بدردتون خورد حمایت کنید :))

473❤‍🔥23👍17🤝9🎉2🔥2

10 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC≈12,700 views310 reactions9 Starsread 30 August 2026

آپدیت جدید Aether: برای بهتر شدن اتصال توی این وضعیت اختلال روی Warp و مسک کار کردم و شانس وصل شدن بیشتر شده توصیه میکنم آپدیت کنید حتما \\\ اسکن وایرگارد درست شد آی‌پی رو بهتر و واقعی تر پیدا می‌کنه. و برای هر آی‌پی فقط یه پورت رو امتحان میکرد یعنی بقیه پورت های جایگزین عملا هیچوقت تست نمیشدن. الان همه‌شون چک میشن. (این رو یکی مشارکت کننده هامون #76 گزارش داد) \\\ پروکسی HTTP اضافه شد پورتش 1820 هستش قبلا فقط SOC

287👍14🔥6😍3

5 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC≈13,000 views188 reactionsread 30 August 2026

ستینگ دیفیکس DefyxVPN رو چک کنید بخش Connection Method گزینه FASTLANE رو فعال کنید و اولویت اول قرار بدید چند سرور پرسرعت و با کیفیت اضافه کردیم تا اتصال بهتر و پایدار‌تری داشته باشید. (نسبت به گزینه های دیگه توی این شرایط پرسرعت تر و بهتره)

172👍11👏3🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈11,900 views126 reactionsread 30 August 2026

⭕️ اطلاعیه: چند پورت مهم مانند پورت ٢٢ بر روی آی پی‌های ایران به سمت شبکه بین الملل از سمت زیرساخت محدود شده است. همچنین شواهد و بررسی‌ها نشان می‌دهند که ارتباطات زیرساخت برای ایجاد یک قطعی گسترده در حالت آماده باش می‌باشد. منبع: منیجیت

🕊92👍224❤‍🔥3👏3🔥1🤝1

4 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC≈11,300 views178 reactionsread 30 August 2026

از وقت و زمانی که گذاشتید Pr بدید و issue باز کنید و باگ گزارش بدید ممنونم. اونایی که بدرد نمیخوردن و وایب کد بودن (کد بی‌کیفیت Ai) قبول نشدن. "سر این قضیه خیلی جدی‌ام" نکته: (مگر اینکه کدی که وایب کد شده اوکی باشه و بدون هیچ ایرادی) بازم میگم از قبل باید دانش شبکه داشته باشید که بتونید توی پروژه مشارکت کنید. من دست تنهام و مشارکت کننده کمه سر همین دیر آپدیت میدم /// هدف این پروژه کمک به دسترسی بهتر مردم به اینتر

161🔥8👍53🤝1

4 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC≈9,550 views202 reactionsread 30 August 2026

یه آپدیت عالی قراره بدم برای بهبود Warp (WireGuard) و مسک/Masque H3/H2 و سرعت h2 قراره بهتر هم بشه. که توی این وضعیت اختلال‌های کشور بهتر متصل بشه. خیلی قراره بهتر بشه. بزودی. :)) خواهیم دید چه میشود.

🔥14340👍11👏6🎉2

2 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC≈8,390 views105 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @irnetmonitorPhoto

ظاهرا تغییراتی در مسیر های اینترنت بین الملل زیرساخت ایران به وجود آمده ، دیگر به جای اذربایجان و شرکت دلتا تلکام شرکت المانی PCCW Global و ایپی رنج 205.252.xxx.xxx داره نمایش داده میشه ، وضعیت بهتر که نشد هیچ بدتر هم شده ، مثلا پینگ تایم کلودفلر رو 5g ایرانسل قبل محدوده 80 90 بود الان 140 160 ، درنهایت این وضعیت nat کردن اینترنت در ایران داره به یک روال عادی تبدیل میشه که جای تاسف دارد

👍936🕊5🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @CluvexStudio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@CluvexStudio edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
30 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Jul 2026, 18:05 UTCAnonymous Poll1,590 voters approx.

از کدوم پروتکل Xray/v2ray بیشتر استفاده میکنید؟ و اگه پروتکل Trojan - Shadowsocks حذف بشه و فقط Vless/Vmess و ... بمونن اوکیه؟ نظرتون رو بگید خیلی مهمه بگید توی نظرسنجی کدوم پرکاربرد تره و بیشتر استفاده میشه:

  1. Vless71%
  2. Vmess5%
  3. Trojan5%
  4. Shadowsocks3%
  5. Hysteria4%
  6. Wireguard11%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 27,967 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CluvexStudio” (@CluvexStudio), 14,500 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CluvexStudio.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.