Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
56 measurements spanning 90 days, net +491. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 13:06
20,057
+60
3 Nov 2026, 09:46
19,997
+34
2 Nov 2026, 06:24
19,963
+12
1 Nov 2026, 09:36
19,951
+26
31 Oct 2026, 13:00
19,925
+15
30 Oct 2026, 16:20
19,910
+15
29 Oct 2026, 19:07
19,895
-7
28 Oct 2026, 21:58
19,902
-7
27 Oct 2026, 19:06
19,909
+11
26 Oct 2026, 18:18
19,898
-10
25 Oct 2026, 17:08
19,908
+2
24 Oct 2026, 20:37
19,906
+8
23 Oct 2026, 20:36
19,898
-5
22 Oct 2026, 23:49
19,903
+11
21 Oct 2026, 23:30
19,892
-3
20 Oct 2026, 20:05
19,895
+32
19 Oct 2026, 17:15
19,863
-2
18 Oct 2026, 14:46
19,865
+19
17 Oct 2026, 12:16
19,846
+7
16 Oct 2026, 13:59
19,839
first reading
Engagement
129 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.5%
avg views ÷ 20,057 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,110
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 129 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
129 (30 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
123,370
Reactions total
2,146
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 15:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈551
Videos
≈214
Links
≈1,460
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
10m 35s
Average length
45s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,107 reactions across 118 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,603
32.4%
❤🔥
2,359
21.2%
👍
1,647
14.8%
😁
1,151
10.4%
💔
941
8.47%
😭
326
2.94%
👌
248
2.23%
🔥
186
1.67%
🤬
168
1.51%
🤯
119
1.07%
⚡
67
0.603%
😢
48
0.432%
🕊
46
0.414%
👨💻
31
0.279%
🙏
31
0.279%
👏
30
0.27%
😡
15
0.135%
🫡
13
0.117%
🎉
12
0.108%
😍
10
0.09%
13 further kinds
56
0.504%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 125 of the 129 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,704 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 129 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 125 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yebekhe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 129 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 31 posts held from the last 30 days (38.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🎬 آموزش تصویری Alan RIP DPI منتشر شد! 🚀
اگه پست معرفی Alan RIP DPI رو دیده باشید، حالا وقتشه نحوه استفاده ازش رو هم یاد بگیرید.
توی این ویدیو، Blue Knight مراحل ساخت کانفیگ رایگان با Cloudflare Pages، نصب NightLine و تست اتصال با قابلیت اسکن IP در Alan RIP DPI رو آموزش داده. ✨
🙏 ممنون از Blue Knight بابت تهیه این آموزش کاربردی.
🎥 تماشای ویدیو در یوتیوب:
https://youtu.be/XAYo9ccKYFQ
🙏 @BlueKnight_Net | @LabAlan
…
❤️ یه نکتهی مهم رو همیشه یادتون باشه؛
قرار نیست برای استفاده از اینترنت، هر روز درگیر پیدا کردن سرویس جدید، تست کردن کانفیگهای مختلف و هدر دادن وقتتون باشید. ⏳
اینترنت قراره ابزاری برای راحتتر کردن زندگی باشه، نه خودش تبدیل به یه مشکل جدید بشه. 🚀
موقع انتخاب سرویس، فقط به قیمت و حجمش نگاه نکنید؛ پایداری، کیفیت، پشتیبانی و راحتی استفاده هم به همون اندازه مهمن. 🌱
مراقب باشید بابت چیزی که قراره بهتون آرامش بده، ب…
زیتل،همراه اول،مخابرات به کل تعطیلا یعنی تانل هم که زدم #دیتاسنتر شاتله به کل تعطیله چه برسه به مستقیم + cdn که روز عادیش قطعه..
ولی سرورلس پترنیها با aether و نهان اکی هست این است قدرت بچه های اینترنت آزاد حالا #فیلترچی خودت رو پاره کن و میلیون میلیون خرج گاییده شدنت کن.
سر پرونده ما و سگارو سوزشون از پولی که مجبورن برای هر روش استفاده کنن گفتن و من عشق کردم وقتی فهمیدم چه مادری ازشون... میشه.
پروکسی متصل
@yebek…
کندی اینترنت مربوط به مادر فیلترچی عزیز نگران نباشید مشکلی از سرور یا اینترنت شما نیست بلکه مشکل از مادر ایشون هست.
نگران نباشید اینترنت ماهم مثل مادر فیلترچی و وزیر ارتباطات خراب است🙏
@yebekhe 👑
🚀 Alan-RIP-Dpi نسخه 1.0.0 منتشر شد!
یه ابزار جدید و کاربردی برای عبور از محدودیتهای DPI در اندروید! 😎
کافیه فقط دکمه اتصال رو بزنید؛ موتور هوشمند برنامه اینترنت شما رو بررسی میکنه و مناسبترین متد عبور رو برای اتصال انتخاب میکنه.
⚡️ ویژگیهای جذاب Alan-RIP-Dpi:
🔹 موتور ۵ لایه ضد DPI در کنار هسته قدرتمند Xray
🔹 اسکنر هوشمند با ۱۷ بردار مهندسیشده برای پیدا کردن متدهای سازگار با اپراتورهای مختلف
🔹 نمایش مرحلهبه…
🙂قبل از این که چنل خودم این پست رو اینجا میزارم اگر #پروژه ای دارید به نظرتون جالبه یا برنامه نویس هستید فکر میکنید پروژه دیده نشده دارید به صورت #رایگان داخل چنل و گروه دولوپر منتشر کنید و بر اساس کار آمد پروژه شما چه در #اینترنت آزاد و چه حوزه های دیگه داخل چنل ها مثل دکی،خودم و بقیه بچها معرفی بشه به صورت رایگان.
چنل پروژه های گیتهاب:
https://t.me/RepoFA
گروه پروژه گیتهاب:
https://t.me/RepoFaGP
گروه ارسال پرو…
با سازنده ها اپلیکیشن های زیادی دارم حرف میزنم اگر بشه این سرورلس و داستان aether رو به بیشتر اپ ها اضافه کنن مخصوصا به اپ هایی که در ios وجود نداره...
البته طبق چیزی که میدونم CluvexStudio داره روی نسخه ios برای ZedSecure کار میکنه که اگر بگیره تکمیل میشه و ios بعد از مدت ها یه #کلاینت خوب براش منتشر میشه در کل پیگیر این قضیه هستم و در کنارش پیگیر #پروکسی دائمی که گفتم و یه پست تکمیل از تمام روش های dns و مربوط به …
Masque Config Generator
ساخت کانفیگ WARP MASQUE برای Xray
ابزار تحت وب برای تولید کانفیگ WARP با پروتکل MASQUE
✨ امکانات:
🔑 ساخت کلید جدید با یک کلیک (با چند API و تعویض خودکار هنگام ریتلیمیت)
📥 ایمپورت فایل JSON ابزار usque یا روش دستی
📱 خروجی برای Clash، v2rayNG، Happ، Streisand، Shadowrocket، MahsaNG و...
⚡️ انتخاب ترنسپورت H2 (TCP+TLS1.2) یا H3 (QUIC+TLS1.3)
🌍 قوانین روتینگ ایران (سایتهای داخلی مستقیم)
🛡 تنظی…
🚀 معرفی ZedSecure؛ یکی از بهترین و کاملترین کلاینتهای اتصال که میتونید داشته باشید!
اگه دنبال یه کلاینت همهفنحریف هستید که تقریباً تمام ابزارهای اتصال رو یکجا در اختیارتون بذاره، حتماً ZedSecure رو امتحان کنید.
نسخه 3.1.8 با کلی قابلیت جدید و تغییرات اساسی منتشر شده:
✨ رابط کاربری جدید Bento
• طراحی کاملاً جدید و مدرن
• ۷ پالت رنگی جدید برای حالت روشن و تاریک
• ویجت اتصال با سه اندازه مختلف
⚡ موتورهای قدرت…
🙂پروکسی #اختصاصی از سمت خودم تست کنید نتیجه رو بهم بگید.
اگر نتیجه خوب باشه احتمال خیلی خیلی زیاد یه پروکسی دائمی راه بندازم تا وصل بمونید.
با سپاس از همکاری شما.
🌐پروکسی اختصاصی:
https://t.me/proxy?server=mt.elitev2.ir&port=8443&secret=ee9a21b42e041132145dd6ae8a87ace5b97777772e6170617261742e636f6d
@yebekhe 👑
@xsfilterrnet 🙂
❤132👍34⚡3❤🔥2👌2💔1🤬1🥰1
Signed امیرپارسا گودمن
Showing the 12 most recent of 129 posts we hold for @yebekhe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @yebekhe as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
20 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
17 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 129 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
7
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
7
vacant every time we have ever looked
@yebekhe named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@mrmt9611 named in 2 posts, 25 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
@glaviterino named in 2 posts, 20 August 2026 – 25 August 2026
@gohardadizapas named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@upper_moon__two named in 1 post, 1 September 2026 – 1 September 2026
@doki_amir_ali named in 1 post, 24 August 2026 – 24 August 2026
@teeegra named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
@piranfar_rental named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“یـ بـ خـ” (@yebekhe), 20,057 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yebekhe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.