Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Natalia Calls || 娜塔莉亚的电话 🇨🇳

Channel

Natalia Calls || 娜塔莉亚的电话 🇨🇳

@CobraGems

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,876subscribers

-3,787 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001784631341
TypeChannel
Username@CobraGems
DescriptionDisclaimer : https://t.me/CobraGems/1068 No Whining. No Crying. No Comments 🔴 Im Not a Financial Advice, Risk in your Hand 🔴 ALWAYS DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH !! 🔴 ☎️Owner : @Nataliacalls
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held44
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CobraGems

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,87613,18310,029.57 August 2026 — 10,663 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,663 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,642 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,618 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,599 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,573 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,535 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,282 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,269 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,244 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,219 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,216 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,200 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,171 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,173 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,140 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,143 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,183 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,170 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,176 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,178 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,166 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,151 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,160 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,115 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,083 subscribers4 September 2026 — 12,933 subscribers7 September 2026 — 12,569 subscribers10 September 2026 — 12,370 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,948 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,754 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,720 subscribers18 September 2026 — 11,693 subscribers29 September 2026 — 9,860 subscribers6 October 2026 — 9,542 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,490 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,515 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,395 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,246 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,013 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,809 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,511 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,088 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,876 subscribers7 August 20265 November 2026
44 measurements spanning 91 days, net -3,787. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,930–14,129 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 44
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 23:116,876-212
2 Nov 2026, 14:197,088-423
30 Oct 2026, 16:547,511-298
27 Oct 2026, 17:087,809-204
24 Oct 2026, 08:208,013-233
21 Oct 2026, 17:308,246-149
18 Oct 2026, 13:568,395-120
15 Oct 2026, 11:488,515-975
12 Oct 2026, 19:379,490-52
6 Oct 2026, 13:169,542-318
29 Sept 2026, 19:169,860-1,833
18 Sept 2026, 04:0111,693-27
15 Sept 2026, 20:5811,720-34
14 Sept 2026, 05:0011,754-194
12 Sept 2026, 16:2111,948-422
10 Sept 2026, 16:2012,370-199
7 Sept 2026, 15:1712,569-364
4 Sept 2026, 13:5912,933-150
2 Sept 2026, 21:4513,083-32
1 Sept 2026, 18:5413,115first reading

Engagement

321 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.80%
avg views ÷ 6,876 subscribers
Avg views / post
330
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
22
of 321 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held321 (4 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total7,267
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 02:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈12,600
Videos
≈215
Links
≈7,380

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
40s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 11:56 UTC307 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

$JOB 股價飆漲至歷史新高 x3, GOD CANDLE coming soon !? 👀🔥

2 Nov 2026, 14:50 UTC390 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

$RAM 🪙 社区看起来坚实而有趣,让我们看看它会走向何方,月亮还是尘埃 看你的条目 📈Chart: https://dexscreener.com/solana/A5FpVH5c4Zya6EwbBWGzLsFDoUGCX5BjSXK4FXKUwHMW X https://x.com/search?q=ram%20altman&src=typed_query&f=live Called by @Cobragems

2 Nov 2026, 13:34 UTC335 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

$FLOAT 🪙 社区看起来坚实而有趣,让我们看看它会走向何方,月亮还是尘埃 看你的条目 📈Chart: https://dexscreener.com/solana/FJk9sajdc2Q4heRPPu3yLzkmf2ZByZkpiHQLv9e2bn5A X https://x.com/floatdotxyz 🌐官网 https://www.floatlaunch.xyz Called by @Cobragems

2 Nov 2026, 13:28 UTC300 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

$BRAIN 🔥 社区看起来坚实而有趣,让我们看看它会走向何方,月亮还是尘埃 看你的条目 📈Chart: https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x2163e464d83b52ed80f1d41bddef426e853633c5fd9a28a0532d0a7229cdd0f3 X https://x.com/usebrainchain 🌐官网 https://usebrainchain.com/ Called by @Cobragems

2 Nov 2026, 13:20 UTC299 viewsread 6 November 2026
Video

🔮 @Cobragems KOL Hit 5X+ $TIPR SOL 在 208.7K 时发出。当前已达到 1.04M。执行干净利落。 LEAD KOL - Rank # 🔮 🔮 208.7K 🔮 1.04M 🔮Caller 🔮Twitter 🔮Trade 🔮DEX 🔮Details 🔮DEV

2 Nov 2026, 13:18 UTC313 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

$PEAK 🪙 社区看起来坚实而有趣,让我们看看它会走向何方,月亮还是尘埃 看你的条目 📈Chart: https://dexscreener.com/solana/H4sb6cH4bJ4G9vJG3cDA2h3gYAMgCfuzXu8h56RhkVnC X https://x.com/LaunchOnPeak 🌐官网 https://www.launchonpeak.fun Called by @Cobragems

1 Nov 2026, 14:02 UTC350 viewsread 6 November 2026
Video

🔮 @Cobragems KOL Hit 2X+ $ETF SOL 在 416.1K 时发出。当前已达到 957.5K。执行干净利落。 LEAD KOL - Rank # 🔮 🔮 416.1K 🔮 957.5K 🔮Caller 🔮Twitter 🔮Trade 🔮DEX 🔮Details 🔮DEV

1 Nov 2026, 13:49 UTC350 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

$OREN 🪙 社区看起来坚实而有趣,让我们看看它会走向何方,月亮还是尘埃 看你的条目 📈Chart: https://dexscreener.com/solana/FptqM7Ev2nWFNT2v4QW5e1cHH6TAkgYtQd2NcJeKWebx X https://twitter.com/solana/status/2115773022229663854 Called by @Cobragems

Showing the 12 most recent of 321 posts we hold for @CobraGems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @CobraGems as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
30 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
30 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Whale 鲸鱼 🔶 BNB
@ChinaPumpCommunity · 63,317
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
Moontok 月兔
@moonspace · 15,190
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 4 October 2026
中国密码鲸公司 🇨🇳🐳🚀🌖
@ChinapumpWXC · 110,833
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
🐳CHINESE CRYPTO WHALES 🇨🇳🇨🇳💷 🐳 || 大鯨魚
@WHALESPUMPBANK · 23,035
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 September 2026
CGT ASIAN COMMUNITY
@ChineasswhalesCGT · 36,297
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
🐳CODY WHALES CALL 中國🐳
@CODYWHALESCALLS · 222,095
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
𝐓𝐀𝐊𝐀𝐍𝐀 𝐄𝐓𝐇 𝐒𝐮𝐫𝐠𝐞 𝐊𝐨𝐥𝐬🪐
@takanaeth101 · 34,209
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 2 September 2026
☎️中国宝石-匚卄丨几乇丂乇🐳
@cryptogems55552 · 162,252
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
看涨中國人 🇨🇳 DRAGON CALL ☏
@Chinese_dragon_calls · 102,417
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
中國東部加密聯盟 EASTERN CHINA CRYPTO ALLIANCE
@CHINAGEMOFCCCN · 96,750
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
🦁 LION JUNGLE 🦁 | LionCalls.io
@LionJUNGLE · 23,586
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 September 2026
DeFi Doxx Calls
@Defidoxxcalls · 32,089
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
Tesla Calls®
@Teslacallsofficial · 71,449
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
Crypto 100X Gems 🚨️
@TheCrypto100XGems · 22,706
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
🦁 LION CALLS 🦁 | LionCalls.io
@LionCALL · 66,980
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
Shakers Calls
@marine_CryptoCalls · 70,456
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
MiniDraft Calls
@minidraftcalls · 74,453
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Natalia Calls || 娜塔莉亚的电话 🇨🇳” (@CobraGems), 6,876 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CobraGems.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.