Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for COMBAT ZONE

Channel

COMBAT ZONE

@CombatBETZONE

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

39,698subscribers

+2,738 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002006971464
TypeChannel
Username@CombatBETZONE
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CombatBETZONE

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

36,42640,72938,577.57 August 2026 — 36,960 subscribers7 August 2026 — 36,960 subscribers8 August 2026 — 36,885 subscribers9 August 2026 — 36,794 subscribers11 August 2026 — 36,721 subscribers12 August 2026 — 36,645 subscribers13 August 2026 — 36,564 subscribers14 August 2026 — 36,426 subscribers16 August 2026 — 40,729 subscribers17 August 2026 — 40,418 subscribers18 August 2026 — 40,312 subscribers19 August 2026 — 40,216 subscribers20 August 2026 — 40,153 subscribers21 August 2026 — 40,056 subscribers22 August 2026 — 39,967 subscribers24 August 2026 — 39,871 subscribers25 August 2026 — 39,797 subscribers26 August 2026 — 39,788 subscribers27 August 2026 — 39,739 subscribers28 August 2026 — 39,842 subscribers29 August 2026 — 40,202 subscribers30 August 2026 — 40,198 subscribers31 August 2026 — 40,270 subscribers1 September 2026 — 40,205 subscribers2 September 2026 — 40,142 subscribers3 September 2026 — 40,040 subscribers5 September 2026 — 39,926 subscribers9 September 2026 — 39,769 subscribers11 September 2026 — 39,593 subscribers13 September 2026 — 39,882 subscribers14 September 2026 — 39,773 subscribers16 September 2026 — 39,698 subscribers39,6987 August 202616 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 40 days, net +2,738. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,781–41,374 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 16:4139,698-75
14 Sept 2026, 21:1739,773-109
13 Sept 2026, 11:1639,882+289
11 Sept 2026, 17:1739,593-176
9 Sept 2026, 06:1839,769-157
5 Sept 2026, 19:4139,926-114
3 Sept 2026, 16:3940,040-102
2 Sept 2026, 12:5340,142-63
1 Sept 2026, 12:3540,205-65
31 Aug 2026, 13:2540,270+72
30 Aug 2026, 10:1340,198-4
29 Aug 2026, 08:4340,202+360
28 Aug 2026, 09:0639,842+103
27 Aug 2026, 11:5839,739-49
26 Aug 2026, 08:2439,788-9
25 Aug 2026, 11:4839,797-74
24 Aug 2026, 14:4439,871-96
22 Aug 2026, 23:0639,967-89
21 Aug 2026, 13:2540,056-97
20 Aug 2026, 15:3540,153first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.2%
avg views ÷ 39,698 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,800
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 September 2026
Posts held44 (10 July 202612 September 2026)
Views total268,540
Reactions total3,578
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Sept 2026, 13:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

8,849 reactions across 44 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,31937.5%
🔥90810.3%
👍8279.35%
😢6937.83%
🕊4515.10%
🫡3664.14%
🤣3604.07%
😭3554.01%
🗿2833.20%
🥱2042.31%
🌚1331.50%
🤔1331.50%
🏆1091.23%
😴810.915%
🙏680.768%
❤‍🔥620.701%
😁610.689%
🥰460.52%
👏360.407%
🍾340.384%
25 further kinds3203.62%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,849 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 12 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Sept 2026, 11:53 UTC≈2,090 views7 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Poll

Who will win?

  1. Jean Silva77%
  2. Jose Delgado26%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7

12 Sept 2026, 11:52 UTC≈6,390 views36 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Poll

Who will win?

  1. Ryan Garcia79%
  2. Conor Benn24%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

27😈9

12 Sept 2026, 11:52 UTC≈6,390 views19 reactionsread 14 September 2026

🥊 FIGHT NIGHT DOUBLEHEADER 🇮🇳 Two massive fights are happening tonight/tomorrow morning for Indian fight fans! 🔥 🇲🇽 NOCHE UFC: JEAN SILVA vs JOSE DELGADO 📅 Sunday, Sept 13 ⏰ Main Card: 2:30 AM IST 🥊 Silva vs Delgado: ~5:00 AM IST 🥊 RYAN GARCIA vs CONOR BENN 📅 Sunday, Sept 13 ⏰ Main Card: 5:30 AM IST 🔥 Garcia vs Benn: ~8:30 AM IST PREDICT THESE FIGHTS HERE PREDICT THESE FIGHTS HERE

19

12 Sept 2026, 11:51 UTC≈6,150 views37 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥227👍6🤯1😁1

9 Sept 2026, 11:31 UTC≈8,820 views134 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

🥊 RYAN GARCIA vs CONOR BENN 🥊 The wait is almost over. 🔥 Two explosive fighters. One massive showdown. 🇺🇸 Ryan Garcia 🇬🇧 Conor Benn 📅 September 13 Who walks away with the win? GARCIA ❤️ or BENN 👍

99👍24🗿91🤨1

5 Sept 2026, 10:29 UTC≈12,400 views344 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

🥊 CHIMAEV vs WOODLEY 🔥 Two elite wrestlers. One mat. No excuses. 📅 5th September ⏰ 9:30 PM IST onwards Who takes the win? Khamzat 👍 Woodley ❤️

👍26859🍾8🤔5🔥4

3 Sept 2026, 07:31 UTC≈13,300 views170 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

🥊 KHAMZAT CHIMAEV vs GILBERT BURNS 🔥 The rematch we never got in the UFC is finally happening! 👀 🇷🇺 Khamzat Chimaev vs 🇧🇷 Gilbert “Durinho” Burns 📅 September 18 🏟️ RAF Event Two elite fighters. One unfinished chapter. Who takes it this time? 🩸

🔥9729🗿18🤔8🥱5👍3🥰3😈3

30 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC≈15,400 views335 reactionsread 14 September 2026

Owais Yaqub has been DISQUALIFIED in his ACBJJ 22 bout against Khasanov. Was this Fair or Owais deserved a Warning?

😢210🤣47😭20🤔17🤯13😐109🌭3

30 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC≈14,500 views266 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😢15039🤣30😭17🤔11🔥10🤪5👍1

30 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC≈14,000 views107 reactionsread 14 September 2026

6 Fights Remaining for Owais Yaqoob’s Fight Watch here

😴5421🥱11🔥8👨‍💻5🏆3😘2😱2

30 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC≈14,100 views142 reactionsread 14 September 2026

Will send the link as soon as it starts

👍76🥱3316🤔9😎5😍2🥰1

30 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC≈14,700 views71 reactionsread 14 September 2026

Owais Yaqoob’s event is delayed by 1hr livestream will now start at 9:30

54👍6🤣5🤔4🥰1😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @CombatBETZONE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@CombatBETZONE edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
7 September 2026
Most recent edit
13 September 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Sept 2026, 11:53 UTCAnonymous Poll578 voters

Who will win?

  1. Jean Silva77%
  2. Jose Delgado26%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Sept 2026, 11:52 UTCAnonymous Poll1,790 voters approx.

Who will win?

  1. Ryan Garcia79%
  2. Conor Benn24%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 12 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Thrill Sports
@thrillsports · 4,455
#1
Sure Bets Guru
@surebetgurus · 1,615
#2
SPORTS BETTING EXPERT ⚽🎾🏏
@indianpredi · 2,211
#3
Matty Betss BETTING 🤑💰
@mattybetsspicks · 35,762
#4
Sports Wings 🪽
@sportswings · 8,374
#5
ARBITRAGE GURU💸🪙👑
@arbitragesguru · 1,430
#6
Canal UFC1 | Full Fights
@CanalUFC1 · 12,711
#7
BestChamp - Sport Analysis
@bestchamp_free · 107,917
#8
SIGMA SAYZ
@Sigmasayzz · 2,048
#9
DUCKY BETS 🦆
@duckybets1 · 12,844
#10
Pido Tipz
@pidotipz · 199
#11
Tipster Charlie - Combat Sports 🥊
@TipsterCharlieCombatSports · 1,778
#12
SURE BETTING TIPS 101%
@sure_tips1000 · 7,714
#13
Toxic Masculinity
@men_at_war · 10,267
#14
Empire
@EmpireSportsAnalysis · 1
#15
BeT-InvesT💰=💹
@rollovero · 369
#16
THE AFFINITY SPORTS
@THEAFFINITYSPORTS07 · 8,783
#17
FIXED FREE ACCUMULATOR MULTIBET PRALAY TICKET TIPS PREDICTIONS CRICKET FOOTBALL TENNIS 1XBET PARIMATCH BETWAY 1WIN SPORTS BET
@FixedTicketAccumulatorMultibet · 603
#18
JBPREDICTZ 🔥
@Jbfootballno1 · 35,030
#19
Magic Betting Tips
@footballinsight01 · 102,603
#20
95 PERCENT SURE AND SAFE TIPS ❤️❤️
@sureandsafetips · 20,202
#21
SKINNY FREE BETS
@SkinnyBetsLeaks · 818
#22
Wings Calls
@wingsscallss · 17,717
#23
Home of Fight
@home_of_fight · 6,835
#24
Premier Wagers FREE VIP Channel
@PremierWagersFREEVIP · 1,713
#25
crypto magazine 🗞️
@CryproMagazine · 4,287
#26
Fight Club | Full Fights
@CanalFightClub · 2,762
#27
Mystic Academy 🚀
@themysticacademy · 333
#28
Capperithm FREE
@capperithm · 828
#29
Kevvstrading
@kevvstrading · 3,236
#30
TradingCrypto 1O1
@TradingCrypto1O1 · 2,827
#31
kingsFXAcademy.inc|Thewiseman🍷
@kingsFXAcademy · 758
#32
Learn Harmonium in Hindi
@VirendersehraHarmonium · 779
#33
Market Ocean📈📊📈
@marketoceanindian · 306
#34
UFC | MMA
@ufc_mma_octagon · 21,406
#35
Bet_developer
@bet_develop · 38,408
#36
Playboyz Den 🗡️
@alphamalepracticalstrategies · 11,397
#37
100%SURE UK FIXED MATCH
@ukfixedmatches06 · 861
#38
💎 CeoPicks ⚽️
@CeoFreePicks · 25,680
#39
WREST.RUSSIAN
@wrestrussian · 171
#40
Let's Learn With Azhar
@letslearnshiksha1 · 5,459
#41
Beats | Instrumentals
@rap_instrumental · 17,265
#42
Death by Desire
@corn_caped_me · 301
#43
Gyankosh Cricket
@gyankoshofficial · 3,780
#44
NEXUS Predicts 1xbet Megapari Bets Free Bets Daily Fixed
@NexusHunts · 338
#45
PRONÓSTICOS CALIENTE MX
@FREPRONOSTICOSADP1 · 1,471
#46
𝗨𝗙𝗖 | 𝗠𝗠𝗔 | 𝘂𝘇
@Islam_Maxachev_LIVE_UFC322 · 17,144
#47

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Matty Betss BETTING 🤑💰
@mattybetsspicks · 35,762
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“COMBAT ZONE” (@CombatBETZONE), 39,698 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CombatBETZONE.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.