Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Toxic Masculinity

Channel

Toxic Masculinity

@men_at_war

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,252subscribers

+77 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001967547700
TypeChannel
Username@men_at_war
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/men_at_war

Growth

10,17410,25210,2137 August 2026 — 10,175 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,175 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,178 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,175 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,174 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,178 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,192 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,207 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,214 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,225 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,226 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,224 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,230 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,232 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,224 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,233 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,241 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,238 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,247 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,246 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,242 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,247 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,245 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,252 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
24 measurements spanning 30 days, net +77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,162–10,264 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 01:3810,252+7
3 Sept 2026, 20:0010,245-2
2 Sept 2026, 14:4710,247+5
1 Sept 2026, 17:1610,242-4
31 Aug 2026, 19:2810,246-1
30 Aug 2026, 18:3510,247+9
29 Aug 2026, 17:5410,238-3
27 Aug 2026, 16:5210,241+8
26 Aug 2026, 17:1510,233+9
24 Aug 2026, 18:5310,224-8
23 Aug 2026, 04:1910,232+2
20 Aug 2026, 14:3510,230+6
19 Aug 2026, 10:5810,224-2
18 Aug 2026, 08:3510,226+1
17 Aug 2026, 09:3810,225+11
15 Aug 2026, 14:0910,214+7
14 Aug 2026, 01:1310,207+15
12 Aug 2026, 18:5710,192+14
11 Aug 2026, 15:5810,178+4
10 Aug 2026, 12:5410,174first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.3%
avg views ÷ 10,252 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,980
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held21 (4 June 202624 August 2026)
Views total1,980
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC≈6,360 viewsread 29 August 2026
Video

Was a pleasure coming a long way with y'all. Adios...!

23 Jul 2026, 01:47 UTC≈8,730 viewsread 29 August 2026

You suffer because you've attached your peace to the outcome. Abandon yourself trying to secure an outcome that's not yours to control. The grounded man pursues the outcome, but he anchors his peace somewhere else. In his character. His effort. His integrity. In knowing that he acted according to his values, regardless of the result.

14 Jul 2026, 12:34 UTC≈9,010 viewsread 29 August 2026

If you're a good swimmer, people don't know you're drowning.

6 Jul 2026, 11:24 UTC≈9,670 viewsread 29 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

30 Jun 2026, 08:42 UTC≈11,000 viewsread 29 August 2026

what life means when you can't even make a person happy.

29 Jun 2026, 15:27 UTC≈10,600 viewsread 29 August 2026

you have power over your mind, not outside events, realize this, and you find strength. You can't control what hits you. You have total control over who it turns you into.

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @men_at_war. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ALL DEFENCE BOOKS LIBRARY
@NDA_CDS_AFCAT_SSB_Book_PDF_Notes · 29,329
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 8 September 2026
COMBAT ZONE
@CombatBETZONE · 39,769
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 1 September 2026
SSB Future Officers
@ssbgeneraldiscussion · 31,092
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 6 September 2026
Insight SSB
@insightssb · 165,587
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 12 August 2026
Barrack’s Buddy
@barracksbuddy · 58,295
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 22 August 2026
Psychology books
@bookspsychology101 · 30,794
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 6 September 2026
Geography by Rahul Sir
@rahulsir_defencewallah · 65,132
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 21 August 2026
INSIGHT CDS & NDA
@insightssbcds · 84,406
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 18 August 2026
SSB/ Physics/ Chemistry / Polity/ AFCAT by Vikrant sir
@Chemistrybyvikrantsir · 45,584
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 27 August 2026
cds.journey KhelGhar
@cdsjourneyquiz · 109,686
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 22 August 2026
Defence Wallah
@pwdefencewallah · 134,954
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 13 August 2026
Brahmacharya™ (ब्रह्मचर्य) Celibacy
@Brahmacharya · 34,930
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 2 September 2026
Defence Squad
@DSquadOfficial · 83,283
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 18 August 2026
OsntTV 📺️
@OsntTV · 46,604
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 27 August 2026
Exams Fighters
@jsscfighters · 37,745
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Toxic Masculinity” (@men_at_war), 10,252 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/men_at_war.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.