Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -212. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,979–22,256 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 01:20
22,011
-13
16 Sept 2026, 18:42
22,024
-10
14 Sept 2026, 23:38
22,034
-10
13 Sept 2026, 11:38
22,044
-14
11 Sept 2026, 15:00
22,058
-11
9 Sept 2026, 01:37
22,069
-7
5 Sept 2026, 17:17
22,076
-20
3 Sept 2026, 16:59
22,096
-7
2 Sept 2026, 07:23
22,103
-15
1 Sept 2026, 07:13
22,118
-6
31 Aug 2026, 08:47
22,124
-8
30 Aug 2026, 07:57
22,132
-4
29 Aug 2026, 06:07
22,136
+2
28 Aug 2026, 07:11
22,134
-9
27 Aug 2026, 07:11
22,143
+3
26 Aug 2026, 04:04
22,140
-2
25 Aug 2026, 00:43
22,142
+7
23 Aug 2026, 09:59
22,135
+5
21 Aug 2026, 20:38
22,130
-2
20 Aug 2026, 13:24
22,132
first reading
Engagement
129 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.17%
avg views ÷ 22,011 subscribers
Avg views / post
917
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 129 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
129 (4 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
38,510
Reactions total
1,742
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 12:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
5,591 reactions across 128 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
2,946
52.7%
💯
1,724
30.8%
custom 5463122435425448565
497
8.89%
⚡
158
2.83%
🤯
153
2.74%
🤣
97
1.73%
😈
16
0.286%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 128 of the 129 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,591 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 129 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
When you tell a woman you’re gonna do something
You MUST do it, even if it’s STUPID to.
For example,
Let’s say you tell this girl you’re going to the new art exhibition and she’s invited if she promises to be on her best behavior
But she says no
YOU MUST GO THERE.
It’s about sending her a clear sign:
I do what I say I do.
AND
I want you, but I don’t need you.
There two mindset’s are key when it comes to mak…
Being open to new experiences makes life 10 times more fulfilling.
The problem is most guys want to do life “right”
They take the path laid out for them by society.
They see a narrow muddy road bridging out from the path and think “umm, that seems dangerous”
Guess what? Of course it is dangerous.
But it’s even more deadly to stick to the safe path.
The safe path is meant for slavery, the life that 99% of people…
The world is still as incredible as it has always been.
Become a beacon of badassery and spread light and positivity.
Surround Yourself with Beauty.
🥂❤️🔥
People are exactly where they deserve to be in life.
If you believe in God, like I do,
Then you SHOULD believe that God is GOOD and FAIR, which I do.
If he is good and fair, that means everyone gets what they deserve in life, sooner or later.
Which means,
If someone is suffering,
They are being tested for the INCREDIBLE future that awaits them. (God sends his toughest challenges to his greatest soldiers, rememb…
Seduction Bible Owner, 3 Years Later:
This is why I do what I do. A lot of people come and go on the internet. They sell with grand promises and then fuck off with a laugh after their first big payday.
Fuck them.
I’m in this for life.
And when you join Seduction Bible, you join me and the 4,600 badasses inside, for life.
Don’t join us if you cannot handle the competition and challenges and tough love that comes …
❤🔥29💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 129 posts we hold for @ourbrohood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
THE GRIM @grimhustle · 22,194 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 21 September 2026
Sarthak Goel - Mens Personality Coach @sarthakgoel1212 · 28,239 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 17 September 2026
The Real World App @officialtrw · 26,463 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🚨The Brotherhood🚨” (@ourbrohood), 22,011 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ourbrohood.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.