Questions? DM me- @AskMRNow
Welcome to The Brotherhood of Charming Misogynists who are Living Lives of Complete Freedom & Sleeping with Beautiful Women.
🍑The Seduction Bible: gum.co/seducewomen
🍒 The Pleasure Bible: gum.co/secretpleasure
Created
22 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net -467. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,686–22,294 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 02:42
21,756
-8
5 Nov 2026, 02:39
21,764
-10
3 Nov 2026, 22:55
21,774
-11
2 Nov 2026, 21:21
21,785
-6
1 Nov 2026, 22:16
21,791
-7
1 Nov 2026, 01:27
21,798
-2
30 Oct 2026, 23:11
21,800
-11
30 Oct 2026, 02:06
21,811
-13
29 Oct 2026, 01:10
21,824
-7
28 Oct 2026, 01:00
21,831
-8
27 Oct 2026, 03:46
21,839
-10
26 Oct 2026, 06:01
21,849
-9
25 Oct 2026, 08:58
21,858
-8
24 Oct 2026, 10:35
21,866
-3
22 Oct 2026, 14:16
21,869
-7
21 Oct 2026, 10:57
21,876
-11
20 Oct 2026, 11:57
21,887
-10
19 Oct 2026, 12:55
21,897
-4
18 Oct 2026, 14:41
21,901
-4
17 Oct 2026, 16:17
21,905
first reading
Engagement
234 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.96%
avg views ÷ 21,756 subscribers
Avg views / post
861
53 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
54
of 234 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
234 (4 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
45,657
Reactions total
2,803
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 02:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,510
Videos
≈84
Links
≈1,250
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,938 reactions across 232 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
5,617
51.4%
💯
3,440
31.4%
custom 5463122435425448565
813
7.43%
⚡
600
5.49%
🤣
221
2.02%
🤯
214
1.96%
😈
33
0.302%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 232 of the 234 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,938 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 234 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 54 posts held from the last 30 days (1.85%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
5,573,923,623.
The number of "men" in the world.
I’m on a Mission to turn 1,000,000 of them into Charming Misogynists.
Not 1,000,001
Not 999,999
1 MILLION.
That is LESS than 1% of men.
Also, let me make this clear:
Being a charming misogynist doesn’t mean sleeping endlessly with women.
The eventual goal is still to build a healthy relationship with ONE beautiful woman.
But to KNOW which one is going to be T…
Be a problem solver, not a problem finder.
I know a person who, you could give him the solution to anyway, but he’ll say “the problem is…”
It’s the wrong way to live life because his brain is designed to seek problems, not solutions.
Ive heard a million problems come out of his mouth, but never a single solution.
These are the same people who care about politics also.
I’ve observed this pattern and it makes sens…
I never talk about politics because I don’t know how to run a country.
But the world is filled with weed smokers and low IQ people who spend more time on instagram than in real life who do.
That's the problem.
Most soft guys have loser fathers who treated them too nicely growing up.
Always buying the latest gadgets, the PS’s, the clothes, all the guy had to do was EXIST and he got what he wanted.
I’ve known a few people like this growing up and today they are struggling, even their family is struggling.
The loser father is still “chilling” everyday burning what I’m assuming is inherited money, while the son, having bein…
The money is in repetition.
You can have the perfect workout routine, but how much you grow depends on how often you use that plan.
You can read the best book, but how much you remember and apply depends on how many times you read it.
You can buy the best course, but how fast you get results depends on how many times over you apply one principle.
The internet is filled with guys who want the perfect plan.
They w…
2/2 (hit character limit on the above message:
But the ONE thing, the common thread that connect us all together, no matter what race or religion, and the most beautiful aspect of this mission:
Is our relentless intention to become superior men who keep fvcking growing.
The Seduction Bible is about women. Yes.
But if you read between the lines and understand the underlying message,
You will find out that it is m…
In many ways, nothing is ever original because it's already floating in the air at all times.
We humans, children of God, can only become AWAKENED enough to "catch" these thoughts and spread them to the world.
In many ways both God and Satan have planted thoughts and ideas. Unfortunately, a few different click of the buttons can lead two people with the same background to lead very different lives.
I don't claim t…
I know I’m right,
because everything I’ve said and done and recommended has created a profound impact in each of our lives. Including my own.
Every man who has taken action on my wisdom has seen his life become better.
There is simply nobody on the internet who cares for you as much as I do, believe it or not.
I know in 10 years time, I will look back and say “Yeah, I’m proud of the impact I created”
You will to…
I find it hard to believe that there are so many beautiful things in the world, things that cost little to no money, things that are right in front of you, experiences in your very own city waiting to be met by you,
and yet most people will never explore that side of life.
You should go to the places where you feel alive.
Not the places which will make you appear more desirable or wanted.
Because when it’s all sa…
Never take anything a woman says about you, seriously.
90% of it is just a shit test that she doesn’t believe herself, just designed to break your frame.
If she points out something you said earlier which makes you “A LIAR!”
Don’t try to explain yourself, even if what she said was a misunderstanding.
Don’t go “No no I didn’t say that, look here's what actually happened”
Now you’re not a liar, sure.
but you’re a…
Just try to live the new life you promised yourself. Just try. Once. If it doesn’t work out you can always go back to your current life.
But you just try. Because until you do, you will always have the question or never having tried.
And that's gonna weigh heavy, man.
❤🔥57💯24
Showing the 12 most recent of 234 posts we hold for @ourbrohood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
THE GRIM @grimhustle · 21,660 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 21 September 2026
Sarthak Goel - Mens Personality Coach @sarthakgoel1212 · 27,303 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 17 September 2026
Opportunity Cell @opportunitycellofficial · 85,733 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 22 September 2026
The Real World App @officialtrw · 25,257 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🚨The Brotherhood🚨” (@ourbrohood), 21,756 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ourbrohood.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.