Just sent out an email on why I’ve been gone. Recommended reading.
💯20❤15🤯5

Channel
@TMAUK
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,360subscribers
+22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001571495163 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TMAUK |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TMAUK |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 10,360 | -4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 10,364 | +1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 10,363 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 10,364 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:26 | 10,368 | +4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 10,364 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 10,371 | +10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 10,361 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 10,368 | +5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 10,363 | +10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 10,353 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 10,349 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 10,346 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 10,347 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 10,352 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 10,350 | +3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 10,347 | -4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 10,351 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 10,349 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 10,348 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
670 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 237 | 35.4% | |
| 💯 | 216 | 32.2% | |
| 🔥 | 128 | 19.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 51 | 7.61% | |
| 👏 | 22 | 3.28% | |
| 🤯 | 9 | 1.34% | |
| 🍾 | 4 | 0.597% | |
| 💊 | 3 | 0.448% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 670 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2025 to 7 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Just sent out an email on why I’ve been gone. Recommended reading.
💯20❤15🤯5
The most important thing a man can learn in the 21st century? Female psychology. Why do women act the way they do? Think the way they think? Want the things they want? I break it all down inside my 100% FREE eBook: https://mastergame.gumroad.com/l/YourSeductionStarterKit?layout=profile
❤17💯3🔥2
You know you’ve won, when they increase the volum of their voice, but not the logic of their argument.
❤🔥30💯15🔥10❤8💊1
Women ignore guys they easily can have, and chase those they easily can’t. To get a woman, you therefore, have to stand out. Your competition is all doing the same: complement her eyes and asks stupid questions like “Sooo, HoW's YoUr dAy beeN?” But that’s boring. Women are tired of it, because they know it’s fake – they know these guys only want to get in ther pants. Instead, disqualify her: “We’d be such a great…
❤38🔥8🍾4💯4👏2
I think guys talk themselves out of sex more than they get rejected. They bring up some stupid topic – like their job, bitcoin, or politics – which is totally boring for women; like a tax seminar in a windowless room. Women just want to have fun. Be exciting = get laid. Getting laid can therefore be boiled down to a pretty simple formula: make her feel something real, something unexpected; add some light teasing, …
❤11💯11
Did you know I’ve written a 100% FREE eBook that breaks down everything you need to know about female psychology in dating? Well, now you know. You can get access here: https://mastergame.gumroad.com/l/YourSeductionStarterKit?layout=profile
❤8🔥3💯1
If you spend too much time with something, you’ll grow to like it. This goes for sadness, chasing a woman who is obviously not into you, or isolation. You have to cut out such toxicity before it becomes a part of your identity.
❤24💯15🔥4
Statistically speaking, women leave relationships first. The #1 reason for breakups? Cheating. Why do women cheat? Because of bad s*x. The solution? My ebook, The S*x Playbook: https://mastergame.gumroad.com/l/TSP?layout=profile
💯9❤🔥4
If she starts pulling away or getting cold for no particular reason, then bet on it — ANOTHER GUY HAS ENTERED THE PICTURE.
💯32🔥12❤4
Until you understand what women are attracted to you’ll continue to have piss-poor results with women. Luckily, female attraction can be broken down into simple, clear components. And that’s excatly what I’ve done inside my ebook, Laws Of Seduction: https://mastergame.gumroad.com/l/Lawsofseduction?layout=profile
❤5💊2💯1
The more you like a woman, the more you should avoid flattering her. Why? Because if you want to keep a woman intrigued, you can’t overindulging her ego. And don’t overcomplicate this. Just think about it for a second. When someone is always showered with compliments, the compliments lose value. That makes sense, right? The more accessible something is, the less valuable it becomes. You follow that logic, right?…
❤20💯11🔥9
The only way to know the true character of a person is to see how they treat someone who can do them absolutely no good. How do people treat people who can’t give them anything of value? The answer to that also reveals their true character.
🔥25💯8❤6❤🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TMAUK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Masculine Alliance | 🔥⚔️” (@TMAUK), 10,360 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TMAUK.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.