Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 35 days, net +889. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,309–43,464 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 12:17
43,331
+171
7 Sept 2026, 04:38
43,160
+76
4 Sept 2026, 12:41
43,084
+38
3 Sept 2026, 01:07
43,046
-7
2 Sept 2026, 01:03
43,053
-59
31 Aug 2026, 23:15
43,112
-145
30 Aug 2026, 19:25
43,257
+49
29 Aug 2026, 18:53
43,208
+20
28 Aug 2026, 20:04
43,188
+12
27 Aug 2026, 20:37
43,176
+79
26 Aug 2026, 18:44
43,097
+24
25 Aug 2026, 19:04
43,073
+63
24 Aug 2026, 18:44
43,010
+89
23 Aug 2026, 03:24
42,921
+66
21 Aug 2026, 15:06
42,855
+2
20 Aug 2026, 15:57
42,853
+25
19 Aug 2026, 12:25
42,828
+34
18 Aug 2026, 13:04
42,794
-57
17 Aug 2026, 16:35
42,851
+58
16 Aug 2026, 07:23
42,793
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 4 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
59.4%
avg views ÷ 43,331 subscribers
Avg views / post
25,700
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.216%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held
23 (4 May 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total
77,200
Reactions total
167
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Sept 2026, 01:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,540
Videos
≈1,470
Links
≈115
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 12s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,643 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,352
82.3%
🥰
71
4.32%
❤🔥
58
3.53%
🔥
58
3.53%
👍
53
3.23%
👎
15
0.913%
🙊
10
0.609%
🤔
10
0.609%
💯
8
0.487%
💔
4
0.243%
👏
3
0.183%
🤩
1
0.061%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,643 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Dating. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 May 2026 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
✨ @Dating update
We’ve made a few changes to make finding and connecting with people in Dating even easier.
📍Location is now required
If your profile doesn’t have a location yet, the next time you open Dating you’ll be asked to select your country and city.
This helps us show you more relevant profiles and makes it easier to find your soulmates nearby.
💜 Stories are now visible in profiles
When someone has crea…
💜 Hey there, Dating community!
We’re not only improving @Dating — we’re also actively growing the Dating Blog on our website.
There, we share interesting articles about dating, communication, connections, online friendship, and everything that can help us understand each other a little better.
And you can help our blog grow too. ✨
If you enjoy our articles, share them with your friends, post the links on your soc…
📸 Profile photo update
We’re making @Dating a little more real.
Starting now, when you open the app, you’ll be asked to update your profile photos.
Please choose photos where your face is clearly visible and you can be easily recognized.
Why are we doing this?
Because behind every profile should be a real person — and seeing who you’re talking to makes meeting someone new feel safer, easier, and more genuine.
I…
📸Profile Photo Update
Today we've started sending notifications to all users asking them to update their profile photos.
We've updated our photo verification system to help keep Dating a place for real people and authentic profiles. This is an important step toward making the community safer, more enjoyable, and more comfortable for everyone.
If you receive this notification, please upload new profile photos that …
✨ What's New in Dating
We're constantly working to make Dating better, and today we'd like to share a few updates that are now available.
📸 Improved Photo Verification
We've updated our photo verification system. From now on, only photos that clearly show a real person and their face will be approved. This helps keep our community authentic and makes the experience more enjoyable for everyone.
🔍Improved Search Fi…
🎉 Great news!
All technical issues have been resolved, and Dating is back online. 💙
Thank you all for your patience, support, and understanding while we worked on fixing the problem. It truly means a lot to our team.
Welcome back! We're happy to have you with us again. ✨
✅ Try out @DatingBot
✅ Explore the website and roadmap: www.datingtg.org
✅ Questions? Reach out to @Datingbotsupport
⚠️ A quick update, Dating Community.
Dating is currently unavailable due to technical issues.
We're already working on resolving the problem. Based on our current estimate, it may take 1–2 days to fully restore the app.
We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience and truly appreciate your patience. 💙
We'll let you know here as soon as Dating is back online 🙏
Sometimes one story says more than a hundred profiles 🤍
In @Datingbot, people don’t just swipe.
They share moments, thoughts and feelings through stories.
You read someone’s story…
and suddenly it feels familiar.
Maybe you’ve felt the same way.
Maybe you just understand them.
And sometimes that’s exactly how a real connection begins.
Maybe your story will resonate with someone too.
✅ Try out @DatingBot
✅ Explor…
Hey there Dating Community !
A small reminder 🤍
Dating is built for real stories, real people and genuine connections.
Accounts that share pornography, explicit content or spam are permanently blocked and can’t return to the app.
We want Dating to stay a safe and comfortable space for everyone.
✅ Try out @DatingBot
✅ Explore the website and roadmap: www.datingtg.org
✅ Questions? Reach out to @Datingbotsupport
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Lately we’ve been thinking about something 🤍
What if some stories from @Datingbot could sometimes be shared a little wider?
Without names, profiles or photos.
Only the story itself.
So that more people could read it and maybe see something familiar in it.
How would you feel about that?
Sometimes one story says more than a hundred profiles.
That’s exactly how @Datingbot works — you read people’s stories, and if something resonates with you, you simply react.
If it’s mutual, you unlock each other’s profiles and continue getting to know one another more deeply 🤍
Just stories, moments, and people in whom you suddenly recognize something familiar.
For any questions about the app you can chat to @Dat…
❤85❤🔥13🔥11👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @Dating. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 31 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Psychology Secrets and Tips | Law of female Psychology | Human Nature | mastering mind control, In the silence you left behind @psychologysecretsmasculinity · 2,878#13
High Vibe @highvibecourse · 1,863 (as read 12 September 2026)#14
ILLUMINATI NEW WORLD ORDER @illuminaty1 · 1,122#15
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
TON Dating Channel @tondatingchannel · 43,862 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 12 September 2026
Canada 🇨🇦 News & Life @canada · 26,640 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dating” (@Dating), 43,331 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dating.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.