He who is socially afraid is a weak man. Fear no one. Fear only God.
❤15✍1👍1🙏1

Channel
@wingmandaily
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,411subscribers
-66 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001617339250 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wingmandaily |
| Description | Cory Smith (aka PUA_DATING_TIPS) is the author of over 10 books on the subject of meeting and seducing women. Many of his books have reached Amazon’s #1 best-seller lists. Cory has dedicated over 10 years of his life to approaching over 4,000 women. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wingmandaily |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 06:26 | 6,411 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:28 | 6,418 | -3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 21:50 | 6,421 | -9 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:56 | 6,430 | -15 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 09:41 | 6,445 | -2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 03:51 | 6,447 | -9 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:58 | 6,456 | -19 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 23:37 | 6,475 | -5 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 06:17 | 6,480 | -1 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 17:16 | 6,481 | +10 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 00:22 | 6,471 | +8 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 6,463 | -5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 6,468 | -10 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 23:01 | 6,478 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:25 | 6,488 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 6,494 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 6,495 | +8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 6,487 | +8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 6,479 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 6,482 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 2 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (2 August 2024 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 7,424 |
| Reactions total | 85 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 10:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
688 reactions across 28 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 256 | 37.2% | |
| 👍 | 179 | 26.0% | |
| 🔥 | 95 | 13.8% | |
| ✍ | 54 | 7.85% | |
| ⚡ | 40 | 5.81% | |
| ☃ | 20 | 2.91% | |
| 💯 | 17 | 2.47% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 2.03% | |
| 😐 | 4 | 0.581% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 0.436% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.436% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.145% | |
| 🎅 | 1 | 0.145% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.145% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 688 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2024 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
He who is socially afraid is a weak man. Fear no one. Fear only God.
❤15✍1👍1🙏1
Being kind and being spineless are two different things. One comes from a position of power, the other is a product of having infinite tolerance for anything. Once people understand that every offence is excused, and you bring about enough courage to stand for yourself, you will watch them exploit you to the extends of exhaustion.
❤6🔥1
Trust should be specific, and never sentimental. "I trust him" is purely vague. The right question is "I trust him to do what, under which conditions?" A person can be trustworthy under certain conditions, yet betray you when they change. To find someone who you can trust blindly in this world, is extremely rare.
❤6
I pray to god, to never get a person as a friend who gives flattering explanations to my wrong impulses. May the few friends I make, choose nothing but to speak truth on my face even if it offends me, for I have no need of a friend who protects my ego to preserve the friendship.
❤7
The true character of a person is revealed when they no longer need anything from you. When a person a person is dependent on you, they are forced to be respectful, attentive, generous or loyal. Most people are not morally good, they are forced to be good. Constraint can mimic virtue surprisingly well.
❤3🔥2
The strongest position is often not being the smartest person, but being the one who understands what everyone else needs. The very core everyone has a desire, we are creatures of incentive driven by ultimate self-interest. Read needs correctly and behavior becomes far less puzzling.
🔥2🆒1
Show too much interest for attention and people sense the insecurity behind it. Show too little interest, being too cold and detached, will eventually lead others to stop making an effort to connect with you. Charm exists in the tension between the two. You make people feel noticed without making them feel necessary; interested without appearing dependent; warm enough to invite them closer, but self-contained enough …
🔥6
The Alpha Male is FEARLESS when interacting with women because he understands that women can sense self-doubt like a shark can sense blood from a mile away. This FEARLESSNESS is SEXY. In contrast, the nice guy beta male conveys self-doubt, and insecurity. Even if it's "rational" it's, WEAK. Women are hardwired to DESPISE WEAK MEN. Always convey STRENGTH, CONFIDENCE, and FEARLESSNESS - even if it's logically irrat…
❤22🔥7☃4
A weak man will tolerate being treated poorly by a woman. As a result the woman will come to see him as being low worth (because she backwards rationalizes it). Her unconscious mind concludes "If he puts up with poor behavior then that's because that is what he deserves." Many men have lusts and sexual desires. But they don't take any concrete action to turn those desires into a reality. This is due to the fact that…
❤54⚡12👍7🔥3✍2🆒1
Nature weeds out the weak. In nature, the strong survive, and the weak perish. This is also true in the sexual marketplace. WEAK MEN STAY SINGLE AND DIE ALONE. A woman can sense weakness in a man - just like a shark can smell blood. Women are DISGUSTED by weak men. Just like confidence attract beautiful women, weakness repulses them. Women are biologically primed to detect and mate with strong men. Women are also…
❤16❤🔥4⚡1✍1
PUT YOURSELF FIRST If you’re in the path of achieving important life goals, and your life purpose, but some woman is getting in the way of that then you have to let her go. YOUR GOALS AND LIFE PURPOSE COME FIRST. This is absolutely essential to understand. Women are too busy obsessing over themselves to give too many fucks about you. If you don’t care about yourself then you will be lost, because that’s a job that …
👍53❤32🔥15✍8⚡4❤🔥4😐4☃2
• Knowing that you have a set of high-demand correlated skills that generate value on command and make you highly desirable commodity in the sexual market place. The knowledge that you can go out on any day, and after a few hours meet a new amazing woman, who you have chemistry with, is incredibly important to have as a man. You want her, but you don’t need her because you can meet another girl (just like her, or eve…
👍23🔥4✍3❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @wingmandaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wingman Daily by Cory Smith” (@wingmandaily), 6,411 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wingmandaily.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.