Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Wingman Daily by Cory Smith

Channel

Wingman Daily by Cory Smith

@wingmandaily

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,411subscribers

-66 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001617339250
TypeChannel
Username@wingmandaily
DescriptionCory Smith (aka PUA_DATING_TIPS) is the author of over 10 books on the subject of meeting and seducing women. Many of his books have reached Amazon’s #1 best-seller lists. Cory has dedicated over 10 years of his life to approaching over 4,000 women.
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/wingmandaily

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,4116,4956,4537 August 2026 — 6,477 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,477 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,474 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,472 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,476 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,482 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,479 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,487 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,495 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,494 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,488 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,478 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,468 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,463 subscribers30 September 2026 — 6,471 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,481 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,480 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,475 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,456 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,447 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,445 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,430 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,421 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,418 subscribers6 November 2026 — 6,411 subscribers7 August 20266 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net -66. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,398–6,508 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 06:266,411-7
2 Nov 2026, 19:286,418-3
30 Oct 2026, 21:506,421-9
28 Oct 2026, 02:566,430-15
25 Oct 2026, 09:416,445-2
22 Oct 2026, 03:516,447-9
18 Oct 2026, 15:586,456-19
15 Oct 2026, 23:376,475-5
13 Oct 2026, 06:176,480-1
6 Oct 2026, 17:166,481+10
30 Sept 2026, 00:226,471+8
15 Sept 2026, 23:216,463-5
12 Sept 2026, 07:206,468-10
7 Sept 2026, 23:016,478-10
2 Sept 2026, 18:256,488-6
30 Aug 2026, 12:436,494-1
27 Aug 2026, 08:036,495+8
24 Aug 2026, 16:336,487+8
20 Aug 2026, 15:436,479-3
17 Aug 2026, 20:356,482first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 2 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.5%
avg views ÷ 6,411 subscribers
Avg views / post
928
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held28 (2 August 2024 – 4 November 2026)
Views total7,424
Reactions total85
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 10:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
44
Videos
44
Links
138

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

688 reactions across 28 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤25637.2%
👍17926.0%
🔥9513.8%
✍547.85%
⚡405.81%
☃202.91%
💯172.47%
❤‍🔥142.03%
😐40.581%
🆒30.436%
🤔30.436%
🍌10.145%
🎅10.145%
🙏10.145%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 688 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2024 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 21:58 UTC396 views18 reactionsread 7 November 2026

He who is socially afraid is a weak man. Fear no one. Fear only God.

❤15✍1👍1🙏1

27 Oct 2026, 14:33 UTC912 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Being kind and being spineless are two different things. One comes from a position of power, the other is a product of having infinite tolerance for anything. Once people understand that every offence is excused, and you bring about enough courage to stand for yourself, you will watch them exploit you to the extends of exhaustion.

❤6🔥1

27 Oct 2026, 10:34 UTC949 views6 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Trust should be specific, and never sentimental. "I trust him" is purely vague. The right question is "I trust him to do what, under which conditions?" A person can be trustworthy under certain conditions, yet betray you when they change. To find someone who you can trust blindly in this world, is extremely rare.

❤6

27 Oct 2026, 06:34 UTC918 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026

I pray to god, to never get a person as a friend who gives flattering explanations to my wrong impulses. May the few friends I make, choose nothing but to speak truth on my face even if it offends me, for I have no need of a friend who protects my ego to preserve the friendship.

❤7

27 Oct 2026, 02:34 UTC895 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026

The true character of a person is revealed when they no longer need anything from you. When a person a person is dependent on you, they are forced to be respectful, attentive, generous or loyal. Most people are not morally good, they are forced to be good. Constraint can mimic virtue surprisingly well.

❤3🔥2

26 Oct 2026, 22:34 UTC872 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026

The strongest position is often not being the smartest person, but being the one who understands what everyone else needs. The very core everyone has a desire, we are creatures of incentive driven by ultimate self-interest. Read needs correctly and behavior becomes far less puzzling.

🔥2🆒1

26 Oct 2026, 18:31 UTC932 views6 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Show too much interest for attention and people sense the insecurity behind it. Show too little interest, being too cold and detached, will eventually lead others to stop making an effort to connect with you. Charm exists in the tension between the two. You make people feel noticed without making them feel necessary; interested without appearing dependent; warm enough to invite them closer, but self-contained enough …

🔥6

16 Oct 2026, 00:37 UTC≈1,550 views33 reactionsread 7 November 2026

The Alpha Male is FEARLESS when interacting with women because he understands that women can sense self-doubt like a shark can sense blood from a mile away. This FEARLESSNESS is SEXY. In contrast, the nice guy beta male conveys self-doubt, and insecurity. Even if it's "rational" it's, WEAK. Women are hardwired to DESPISE WEAK MEN. Always convey STRENGTH, CONFIDENCE, and FEARLESSNESS - even if it's logically irrat…

❤22🔥7☃4

24 Nov 2025, 21:34 UTC≈8,500 views79 reactionsread 7 November 2026

A weak man will tolerate being treated poorly by a woman. As a result the woman will come to see him as being low worth (because she backwards rationalizes it). Her unconscious mind concludes "If he puts up with poor behavior then that's because that is what he deserves." Many men have lusts and sexual desires. But they don't take any concrete action to turn those desires into a reality. This is due to the fact that…

❤54⚡12👍7🔥3✍2🆒1

24 Nov 2025, 21:34 UTC≈6,700 views22 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Nature weeds out the weak. In nature, the strong survive, and the weak perish. This is also true in the sexual marketplace. WEAK MEN STAY SINGLE AND DIE ALONE. A woman can sense weakness in a man - just like a shark can smell blood. Women are DISGUSTED by weak men. Just like confidence attract beautiful women, weakness repulses them. Women are biologically primed to detect and mate with strong men. Women are also…

❤16❤‍🔥4⚡1✍1

20 Aug 2024, 15:02 UTC≈14,800 views123 reactionsread 7 November 2026

PUT YOURSELF FIRST If you’re in the path of achieving important life goals, and your life purpose, but some woman is getting in the way of that then you have to let her go. YOUR GOALS AND LIFE PURPOSE COME FIRST. This is absolutely essential to understand. Women are too busy obsessing over themselves to give too many fucks about you. If you don’t care about yourself then you will be lost, because that’s a job that …

👍53❤32🔥15✍8⚡4❤‍🔥4😐4☃2

19 Aug 2024, 15:01 UTC≈9,570 views32 reactionsread 7 November 2026

• Knowing that you have a set of high-demand correlated skills that generate value on command and make you highly desirable commodity in the sexual market place. The knowledge that you can go out on any day, and after a few hours meet a new amazing woman, who you have chemistry with, is incredibly important to have as a man. You want her, but you don’t need her because you can meet another girl (just like her, or eve…

👍23🔥4✍3❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @wingmandaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

THE GRIM
@grimhustle · 21,634
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 21 September 2026
Opportunity Cell
@opportunitycellofficial · 85,673
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 22 September 2026
🚨The Brotherhood🚨
@ourbrohood · 21,735
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 22 September 2026
Sarthak Goel - Mens Personality Coach
@sarthakgoel1212 · 27,268
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 17 September 2026
💋Cleopatra | Eden Apple©️
@TheEdenApple · 20,899
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 September 2026
The Real World App
@officialtrw · 25,204
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 12 September 2026
First Aid book & videos 2026
@Usmle_FA_UW · 25,246
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Wingman Daily by Cory Smith” (@wingmandaily), 6,411 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wingmandaily.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.