Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dark Picks

Channel

Dark Picks

@Dark_picks

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,663subscribers

-263 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001229429905
TypeChannel
Username@Dark_picks
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Dark_picks

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,6637,9267,794.57 August 2026 — 7,926 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,926 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,905 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,882 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,866 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,852 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,832 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,823 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,806 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,776 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,761 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,714 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,685 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,663 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net -263. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,624–7,965 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 23:017,663-22
13 Sept 2026, 20:587,685-29
10 Sept 2026, 12:577,714-47
5 Sept 2026, 03:387,761-15
1 Sept 2026, 16:367,776-30
29 Aug 2026, 11:137,806-17
26 Aug 2026, 19:037,823-9
24 Aug 2026, 05:027,832-20
20 Aug 2026, 11:387,852-14
17 Aug 2026, 17:487,866-16
14 Aug 2026, 07:477,882-23
11 Aug 2026, 09:457,905-21
7 Aug 2026, 13:017,926no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:557,926first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 5 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
47s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

566 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥13323.5%
😭10017.7%
8815.5%
😁8314.7%
💔437.60%
❤‍🔥386.71%
🥰346.01%
💯274.77%
😐50.883%
40.707%
👍30.53%
🌚20.353%
🗿20.353%
😈20.353%
10.177%
👀10.177%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 566 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2026 to 17 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jun 2026, 06:47 UTC≈4,320 views68 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

You are sheltering the enemy of the state with a vpn are you not?

😁54🥰93🌚2

23 May 2026, 14:51 UTC≈5,650 views53 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

I ordered The Prince from meesho

😭42🥰6🔥3😈2

10 May 2026, 15:49 UTC≈5,730 views23 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

Music for the readers

🔥14💔6😭21

10 May 2026, 15:33 UTC≈5,450 views21 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Philosophy I stick to (yet) I mean some people object to me posting gore memes a long while back sometimes in criticism but mostly in curiosity as to ask what is the co-relation between Dark picks and the extreme violence, the posts are highly thought of but the other one seems just out of context. To simply put it, it’s because I think it’s a joke, a lot of people avoid such things to secure a supposed peace of min

❤‍🔥117🔥2🥰1

5 May 2026, 18:28 UTC≈4,280 views22 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://t.me/men_at_war/2603 https://t.me/men_at_war/2605 These are the people running your mind when they themselves have no idea of what they’re writing. I mean I don’t even have to explain the obvious retarded content. They are not ethical and well read them out they just put out whatever seems “cool”. “Oh you’re emotionally in a turmoil well then kill yourself you are a disappointment to your entire bloodline”

💯126❤‍🔥2🔥2

5 May 2026, 12:52 UTC≈4,000 views48 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

34💯9🔥3🥰2

5 May 2026, 12:50 UTC≈3,820 views25 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

I go by the David lynch’s rule of creativity you don’t have to be in conflict to write conflict, you don’t have to suffer in order to write suffering. The idea of a tortured artist is almost romantic but in the end you have to enjoy the process if you even want to continue it. Be regular and orderly in your life, so that you can be violent and original in your work - gustavo flaubert. Am I happy with my life? well ye

🔥14🥰4😭321❤‍🔥1

3 May 2026, 16:25 UTC≈3,070 views16 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

I’m not very keen on the idea of making the next post asap if you weally weally wanna read it then comment I’mapsychopath and i’ll write lol jk Let me know if you want the next part soon There are some disturbing illustrations in the comments check them out till next part comes out…. Missed y’all enjoy the posts

9🔥4🥰2❤‍🔥1

3 May 2026, 16:24 UTC≈2,740 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026

To make matters a worse he has his own take on the philosophy of nature and punishment, Punishments are always proportionate to the crime, and crimes are always proportionate to the amount of information possessed by the guilty party; the flood presupposes extraordinary crimes, and those crimes presuppose that we possess information greater than what we really have.” There are Joseph de Maistre’s comments on original

🔥7🥰31❤‍🔥1

3 May 2026, 16:24 UTC≈2,510 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026

120 days of Sodom. -by Marquis de sade. Still banned by many countries its a very infamous novel which was enjoyed by the So called nobles and rich (yes) after a while France recovered the original manuscript of the book claiming that its a national treasure to the nation as a literary art. Well lets not comment on that the fact of the matter is that this book was written by a nobleman who was imprisioned for life b

7❤‍🔥3🥰2😭1

3 May 2026, 15:02 UTC≈2,640 views30 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Read and completed 120 days of sodom so you don’t have to (the unprecedented top tier disturbing outright shitcraft of a book, Whose writer’s Name is the inspiration behind the term Sadism) Post of summarised few scenes will soon be posted (do not read if you don’t want to, no one’s forcing you to and if they are send a mail to the publishers they may add your chapter too)

🔥194😭4🗿2💔1

2 May 2026, 13:04 UTC≈2,680 views58 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

All subs lost but fuck it we ball

💔35😭12💯5🔥51

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Dark_picks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Apr 2026, 13:10 UTCAnonymous Poll351 voters

Who writes better

  1. Dostoevsky74%
  2. Tolstoy37%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2026 to 17 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Gharkekalesh
@gharkekaleshh · 74,399
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 19 August 2026
LiveLeak | LeakLive USA
@leaklive_tg · 77,953
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 20 August 2026
𝗠𝗘𝗚𝗛 𝗨𝗣𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗦
@MeghUpdates · 82,431
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dark Picks” (@Dark_picks), 7,663 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dark_picks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.