Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Coolors

Channel

Coolors

@Coolors

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,367subscribers

-90 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001665298569
TypeChannel
Username@Coolors
Created24 October 2022measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Coolors

Growth

7,3677,4577,4127 August 2026 — 7,457 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,457 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,444 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,433 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,419 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,407 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,397 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,389 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,382 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,377 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,367 subscribers7 August 20264 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 28 days, net -90. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,354–7,471 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 15:187,367-10
1 Sept 2026, 09:087,377-5
29 Aug 2026, 13:567,382-7
26 Aug 2026, 23:447,389-8
24 Aug 2026, 07:547,397-10
20 Aug 2026, 14:347,407-12
17 Aug 2026, 18:277,419-14
14 Aug 2026, 13:187,433-11
10 Aug 2026, 19:377,444-13
7 Aug 2026, 15:377,457no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:457,457first reading

Engagement

100 posts held, back to 24 October 2022the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.54%
avg views ÷ 7,367 subscribers
Avg views / post
114
77 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.783%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
77
of 100 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 77 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held100 (24 October 202228 August 2026)
Views total8,744
Reactions total24
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 23:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 29 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2573.5%
823.5%
🔥12.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 100 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2022 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC71 viewsread 28 August 2026

Дайджест новостей в дизайне за неделю (22.08.26 — 28.08.26) Новости дизайна: новый логотип для «Индилайт», ребрендинг Кубка мира по стрельбе из лука, дизайн упаковки Fish&More, новые обложки от Dirol, айдентика для «Нагория» и многое другое! Читать на дизайнерс | #дайджест

27 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC131 viewsread 28 August 2026

Магазин карточек в мобильном приложении Как магазин карточек на Ozon Seller превратился в мобильное приложение? Узнайте об адаптации веб-флоу, уникальных интерфейсах и решениях для удобства продавцов в B2B-сделках Читать на дизайнерс | #статья

26 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC163 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Студийная × дизайнерс Август уже перевалил за экватор, а значит, пора проверить, все ли ваши публикации добрались до конкурса. Если с 1 по 30 августа у вас на дизайнерс вышли кейсы, статьи, туториалы, исследования, чек-листы или другие материалы — отправляйте ссылки в @StudiynayaDSGNERSbot. В конце месяца раздадим: 🎙 3 бизнес-подписки на дизайнерс на полгода + 3 посева по большой сетке каналов — за максимальное к

26 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC142 viewsread 28 August 2026

ДИгадка №41 Дизайнер задумал серию 52 загадок, но после 40 столкнулся с непредвиденными трудностями. Что заставило его изменить планы? Узнай в статье Читать на дизайнерс | #урок

25 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC186 viewsread 28 August 2026

Дизайн-центричное управление продуктами: превращаем макеты в деньги Измерение влияния дизайна на бизнес: готовые шаблоны, план внедрения и анализ данных. Как принимать продуктовые решения на основе данных и улучшить дизайн-центричный подход Читать на дизайнерс | #статья

25 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC185 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Новость, которую вы точно не ждали Сейчас отовсюду кричат про AI, про необходимость дизайнеру проникаться этими технологиями. Кричат не зря, наверное это уже база, чтобы быть конкурентноспособными (да че говорить, если я сам помогаю делать дизайн раздела образования через клод). Уже начали появляться курсы и интенсивы, которые дают неплохой старт, для того что бы дизайнер встал на новые ai-рельсы. Пару месяцев наза

22 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC281 viewsread 28 August 2026

«Клод, сделай как в прошлый раз»: дизайн, вёрстка и навыки, которые не плавают Статья о сложностях сотрудничества с дизайнером, который не придерживается единого стиля и постоянно меняет подходы к выполнению задач. Как сохранить баланс и эффективность в работе? Читать на дизайнерс | #статья

21 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC299 viewsread 28 August 2026

Иконки в Figma: где найти, как добавить и подготовить к разработке Узнайте, как правильно подготовить иконку для веб-разработки. Проверьте Fill и Stroke, настройте размеры и соберите SVG-компоненты для передачи разработчику Читать на дизайнерс | #статья

20 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC332 viewsread 28 August 2026

Флоу и промпты для генерации 3D-композиции и материалов в Nano Banana Узнай, как генерировать и собирать сцены из 3D-объектов в Nano Banana 2, оптимизируя работу с материалами и освещением Читать на дизайнерс | #урок

18 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC410 viewsread 28 August 2026

3 привычки, из-за которых ИИ-генерации выглядят одинаково Статья об однообразии контента, создаваемого искусственным интеллектом. Рассматриваются привычки, влияющие на результаты генерации, и показывается, как распознать качественный контент Читать на дизайнерс | #статья

16 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC500 viewsread 28 August 2026

За каких дизайнеров будут держаться зубами Статья о возвращении Яны из "Арбуза" после долгого отсутствия. Кратко о прошлом, новых планах и почему читателям стоит следить за обновлениями Читать на дизайнерс | #статья

15 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC495 viewsread 28 August 2026

Битубиссимо №1. Что объединяет Jira, Linear, Slack и Lovable? Статья о том, как поддерживать здоровье на работе и оставаться энергичным весь день. Полезные советы и рекомендации для бизнесменов и офисных сотрудников Читать на дизайнерс | #статья

Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @Coolors. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Секси-цвет. Твое вдохновение
@sexycolors · 37,149
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
ФотоГуру | Фотошоп и Дизайн
@photoshop_guru · 43,893
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
Behancer | Лучшие дизайн-проекты с Behance
@behancerdsgn · 41,656
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
Иллюстратор | Графика и Дизайн
@illustrt · 35,788
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
Design Box | Дизайн, Графика, Figma
@dsgn_box · 46,211
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
Adobe Illustrator | Graphic Design
@Illustrationlessons · 47,566
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
ABC Letters
@abcletters · 33,265
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 September 2026
Я работаю в digital, детка 🚀
@digital_rabota · 34,002
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Coolors” (@Coolors), 7,367 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Coolors.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.