Превратили профориентацию в интерактивный опыт: Naked eye фотозона для Форума колледжей Москвы от студии Akademia Форум колледжей Москвы: как интерактивная фотозона с Naked Eye помогла школьникам выбрать профессию. Узнайте, какие креативные и технические решения использовала студия Akademia для привлечения внимания и информирования о направлениях обучения Читать на дизайнерс | #кейс

Channel
Божественный фотошоп
@design_hell
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,347subscribers
-229 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001173228596 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @design_hell |
| Description | Дизайн-треш - первый канал о интересном и местами чекнутым фотошопе! По рекламе и сотрудничеству: @design_manager_bot |
| Created | 25 December 2019 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/design_hell |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 30,347 | -21 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 30,368 | -21 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 30,389 | -20 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 30,409 | -22 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 30,431 | -32 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 30,463 | -38 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 30,501 | -21 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 30,522 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 30,525 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 30,530 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:51 | 30,537 | -16 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 30,553 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 30,558 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 30,565 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 30,571 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 30,576 | first reading |
Engagement
141 posts held, back to 25 December 2019 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.498%
- avg views ÷ 30,347 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 151
- 140 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 140
- of 141 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 141 (25 December 2019 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 21,171 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 5
- Links
- 6
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 5m 25s
- Average length
- 33s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Флоу и промпты для генерации 3D-композиции и материалов в Nano Banana Узнай, как генерировать и собирать сцены из 3D-объектов в Nano Banana 2, оптимизируя работу с материалами и освещением Читать на дизайнерс | #урок
Дизайн упаковки: что важно учесть до запуска производства Статья расскрывает, какие секреты скрывает красивая упаковка товаров и почему важна не только внешняя привлекательность продукции, но и продуманная внутренняя структура Читать на дизайнерс | #статья
Как я мотивирую себя что-то делать. Советы по продуктивности 😍 Статья развеивает мифы о вдохновении и рассказывает, что важнее — действие. Автор объясняет, как не ждать момент вдохновения, а создавать его самому Читать на дизайнерс | #статья
Онбординг, который не раздражает - разбираю 5 примеров Исследования показывают, что многие пользователи закрывают онбординг на третьем экране из-за избыточных модалок с приветствиями. Как это повлияло на их дальнейшее использование продукта? Читать на дизайнерс | #статья
Битубиссимо №1. Что объединяет Jira, Linear, Slack и Lovable? Статья о том, как поддерживать здоровье на работе и оставаться энергичным весь день. Полезные советы и рекомендации для бизнесменов и офисных сотрудников Читать на дизайнерс | #статья
Photoshop помогает собрать визуал, который выглядит дороже Один из секретов дорогого визуала — это не количество эффектов, а внимание к деталям. В Photoshop можно собрать очень сильную подачу, если грамотно работать с тенями, светом, текстурами, цветом и композицией. Даже простой объект начинает выглядеть дороже, если у него есть правильная глубина, аккуратный контраст и чистая обработка. Это особенно полезно для пос…
Ретушь должна быть незаметной Хорошая ретушь — это не та, которую видно, а та, которую не замечают. В Photoshop легко увлечься и переборщить с обработкой: слишком гладкая кожа, неестественные тени, пластиковые цвета, лишняя резкость. Но в большинстве случаев задача ретуши — не изменить объект до неузнаваемости, а убрать отвлекающие детали и сохранить естественность. Особенно это важно в дизайне для брендов, рекламы и…
Корректирующие слои важнее, чем кажется Одна из сильнейших привычек в Photoshop — не “красить напрямую”, а работать через корректирующие слои. Это позволяет менять цвет, контраст, насыщенность, свет и тон без разрушения оригинала. Такой подход особенно полезен в брендинге, фотоконтенте и рекламной графике, где часто нужно сравнивать варианты и быстро вносить правки. Вместо того чтобы переделывать всё заново, ты прост…
Слои и маски — основа аккуратной работы Если в Photoshop работать “в лоб”, файл быстро превращается в хаос. Поэтому основа грамотного процесса — это слои, группы и маски. Слои помогают держать структуру, группы — не теряться в большом проекте, а маски дают возможность редактировать неразрушающе. Это особенно важно, когда приходится часто возвращаться к файлу, вносить правки или показывать проект клиенту. Хорошо собра…
Photoshop — не про “эффекты”, а про контроль Photoshop часто воспринимают как программу для фильтров, теней и красивых картинок. Но на деле его главная сила — в контроле. Здесь важно не столько “сделать вау”, сколько точно управлять цветом, слоями, масками, ретушью и композицией. Именно поэтому Photoshop до сих пор остаётся одним из главных инструментов для графического дизайна. Он помогает доводить картинку до нужно…
Какая форма у звука Исследования показывают, что связь между звуком и формой глубже, чем кажется. Рано развивающееся соответствие звуков и визуальных/тактильных качеств может быть универсальным Читать на дизайнерс | #статья
Showing the 12 most recent of 141 posts we hold for @design_hell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 924,458 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@design_hell named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@photoshop_hack · 59,605
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
@design_telega · 80,011
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Божественный фотошоп” (@design_hell), 30,347 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/design_hell.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.