Студийная × дизайнерс Август уже перевалил за экватор, а значит, пора проверить, все ли ваши публикации добрались до конкурса. Если с 1 по 30 августа у вас на дизайнерс вышли кейсы, статьи, туториалы, исследования, чек-листы или другие материалы — отправляйте ссылки в @StudiynayaDSGNERSbot. В конце месяца раздадим: 🎙 3 бизнес-подписки на дизайнерс на полгода + 3 посева по большой сетке каналов — за максимальное к…

Channel
Дизайн До и После
@b_and_a_design
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,991subscribers
-239 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001582903236 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @b_and_a_design |
| Created | 29 September 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/b_and_a_design |
Topic
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:02 | 12,991 | -21 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 13,012 | -6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 13,018 | -8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 13,026 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 13,029 | -18 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:20 | 13,047 | -24 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 06:21 | 13,071 | -6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 13,077 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:04 | 13,080 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 13,085 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 13,092 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 13,094 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 13,105 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 13,109 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 13,111 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 13,117 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 13,123 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 13,127 | -9 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 13,136 | -9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 13,145 | first reading |
Engagement
64 posts held, back to 29 September 2021 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.78%
- avg views ÷ 12,991 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 231
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 64 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 64 (29 September 2021 – 26 August 2026) |
| Views total | 462 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 20:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 8m 16s
- Average length
- 29s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2021 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Новость, которую вы точно не ждали Сейчас отовсюду кричат про AI, про необходимость дизайнеру проникаться этими технологиями. Кричат не зря, наверное это уже база, чтобы быть конкурентноспособными (да че говорить, если я сам помогаю делать дизайн раздела образования через клод). Уже начали появляться курсы и интенсивы, которые дают неплохой старт, для того что бы дизайнер встал на новые ai-рельсы. Пару месяцев наза…
Тренды-2026: что сейчас реально работает в веб-дизайне? Смелые монохромные палитры (глубокий синий, зелёный), яркий акцент только в одном блоке. Анимация интерфейса на уровне деталей: точечные hover, скролл, плавные появления/уходы. Иллюстрации, 3D-рендер или селективная фотография (кейс: один уникальный арт вместо 10 стоковых). Вертикальный ритм — ленты, короткий скролл, разбивка на “сцены” как на главных Notion, Li…
Первый экран = 80% впечатления. На что ставить акцент? Первые 3 секунды — ключевые! Один мощный заголовок вместо “простыни” текста. Живой фото-/видеоконтент: реальный продукт, лицо, эмоция. Чистая, заметная кнопка действия (CTA) — без “мыла” и лишних декоров. Пара фишек интерфейса: динамика, асимметрия, microanimation. Экспериментируй: добавь bold-тиграфику, минимализм или split layouts — это работает даже на простых…
Как сделать чистый, “дорогой” дизайн без премиального бюджета Используй пару базовых цветов + 1–2 акцента, всё остальное — белое. Не мельчи: оставляй большие “дышащие” отступы, крупные шрифты и фото. Минимум эффектов: no gradients, no drop shadow, только если уверенно чувствуешь стиль. Вставляй понятные UI-иконки — SVG, монохром или нейтральные. Смотри, как сделано у Apple, Stripe, Pitch — учись у сильнейших. Фокус: …
UX: логика превращает дизайн в реальные заявки Один путь пользователя — одна задача. Не перегружай первый экран ссылками и сложными меню. Разделяй инфо блоки — максимум одна мысль на секунду. Используй те же CTA-фразы по всему сайту: “Заказать”, “Забронировать”, “Подробнее”. Собирай обратную связь и корректируй слабые места на ходу — прототипируй. FAQ и блок доверия всегда ближе к конверсионной кнопке! Сильный UX — к…
Типовые действия, которые реально влияют на результат Делай всегда версию для мобильных (mobile first!). Проверяй цвета и шрифты в тёмном/светлом режиме. Используй сетки и направляющие (Figma, XD) — мелочи решают! Пару раз в месяц обновляй портфолио и пробуй редизайн кейсов — это развивает “насмотренность”. Не забывай про скоростные тесты (Lighthouse/Google PageSpeed) — дизайн не спасёт, если всё тормозит.
Product Card E-commerce Minimal Shop Website #веб
Сайт комплексных поставкок металлопроката. Хороший пример, что такую неэстетичную вещь можно представить грамотно иинтересно. Сайт тут
Мобильное фитнес-приложение Категория: #фитнес Язык: #en https://dribbble.com/shots/25679110-Fitness-App-Design-Concept
Kay - Fashion Website #веб
Мобильное приложение для управления умным домом Категория: #приложение Язык: #en https://dribbble.com/shots/23308670-Smart-Home-App
Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @b_and_a_design. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dsgn_tutorial · 82,746
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
@behancedsgn · 24,981
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 September 2026
@figmaweb · 40,843
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
@dsgn_tochka · 23,848
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 September 2026
@lgvdsgner · 25,388
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
@design_hell · 30,078
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
@illustrt · 35,592
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
@magazine_design · 24,356
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
@figma60sec · 25,315
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026
@behancerdsgn · 41,442
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
@psd_eu · 26,645
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 September 2026
@photoshop_guru · 43,668
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
@design_telega · 79,070
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
@figma_maketss · 35,290
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@true_figma · 26,128
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
@dsgn_box · 45,917
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
@designbirzha · 52,732
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 August 2026
@package_design · 23,586
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 September 2026
@intelligentdsgners · 25,399
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026
@pinterest_design_art · 69,001
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 August 2026
@design_awards · 21,957
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 September 2026
@graphic_and_design · 23,272
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 September 2026
@samozanyatiye · 73,307
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
@vidguru · 28,219
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дизайн До и После” (@b_and_a_design), 12,991 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/b_and_a_design.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.