Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for X-Files | Секретные материалы 👽

Channel

X-Files | Секретные материалы 👽

@X_Files_sekretnyye

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,709subscribers

-343 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001156272743
TypeChannel
Username@X_Files_sekretnyye
Description"ПЕРВЫЙ ИНОПЛАНЕТНЫЙ" - тайны, загадки, мистика, космос. Всё необычное, что нас окружает на нашей планете и за её пределами. https://t.me/+I1K7yEsiuVg1ZDA6 📈По вопросам: @EwgenG Реклама: @Social_Energy
Created5 December 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/X_Files_sekretnyye

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

23,70924,05223,880.56 August 20266 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 92 days, net -343. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,658–24,103 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 20:2923,709-3
5 Nov 2026, 23:1123,712-2
4 Nov 2026, 23:4623,714-5
3 Nov 2026, 21:0623,719-1
2 Nov 2026, 23:5623,720-5
1 Nov 2026, 20:5723,725-5
31 Oct 2026, 21:2623,730-8
30 Oct 2026, 23:4723,738-5
30 Oct 2026, 01:0923,743-2
29 Oct 2026, 00:0923,745-10
27 Oct 2026, 20:5123,755-6
26 Oct 2026, 23:1623,761-3
26 Oct 2026, 01:1723,764-5
25 Oct 2026, 04:1723,769-5
24 Oct 2026, 06:0523,774-4
23 Oct 2026, 03:5723,778-4
22 Oct 2026, 03:2723,782-5
20 Oct 2026, 22:5823,787+1
19 Oct 2026, 19:5723,786-9
18 Oct 2026, 22:4823,795first reading

Engagement

440 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 113 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.08%
avg views ÷ 23,709 subscribers
Avg views / post
731
60 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
116
of 440 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held440 (5 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total43,842
Reactions total963
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 13:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈13,300
Videos
≈4,310
Links
≈1,520

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 59m
Average length
51s

Measured directly from 142 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,002 reactions across 224 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👀74118.5%
🔥60115.0%
👍58314.6%
😁42310.6%
🤯2917.27%
❤2325.80%
😱1493.72%
😡1263.15%
🙈1102.75%
😍872.17%
😢852.12%
💯741.85%
✍651.62%
🙏621.55%
🤔571.42%
🥰541.35%
😎401%
😐390.975%
😨390.975%
🤗220.55%
10 further kinds1223.05%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 224 of the 440 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,002 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 440 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 116 posts held from the last 30 days (5.17%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 08:05 UTC319 views12 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Руины гигантской Кыз-Калы (крепости) древнего города Мерв, Туркменистан. Расположенные вдоль исторического Шелкового пути , древние руины Мерва , самые ранние свидетельства заселения которого датируются примерно 3000 годом до н.э., находятся здесь . Заселение продолжалось до XVIII века н.э. В период Ахеменидской империи Мерв служил центром сатрапии Маргиана. ----- Большая и Малая Кыз-кала (также «Девичья крепость»…

🔥6🤯3👍2🆒1

6 Nov 2026, 06:05 UTC656 views17 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Похоже голографический проект "Голубой луч" уже начали запускать. Сотни людей в Чигнахуапане, Мексика, в ужасе и шоке наблюдали, как гигантский конусообразный летательный аппарат средь бела дня бросал вызов всем законам гравитации. Люди застыли на месте, наблюдая, как эта штука просто парит над их головами, наблюдая за ними. Конечно, промытые мозги и обычные «эксперты» уже начали плакать в комментариях, называя это …

🤯8👀6✍1❤1😁1

6 Nov 2026, 06:01 UTC615 views14 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Изyчeние виртуальной реальности в исследовательском центре NASA, 1989 год. 👽 X-Files ПЕРВЫЙ ИНОПЛАНЕТНЫЙ С нами интересно 🖖 #прошлое

👀6👍4🤔3😁1

4 Nov 2026, 10:39 UTC938 views24 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

На Галапагосских островах фотограф заснял морскую игуану с крабами на теле — выглядит так, будто она подобрала себе аксессуары 😎 👽 X-Files ПЕРВЫЙ ИНОПЛАНЕТНЫЙ С нами интересно 🖖 #нашапланета

🔥14❤4👀3😎3

4 Nov 2026, 05:49 UTC936 views21 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Это один из Свитков Мертвого моря, был найден в пещерах близ поселения Кумран в 1947 году. Датируется (радиоуглеродный анализ) примерно 125 годом до нашей эры. Содержит Книгу пророка Исайи (еврейский Танах, Ветхий Завет). Сохранились почти все 66 глав рукописи. В главе 53-й, как считают христиане, записано прямое пророчество о Иисусе. Причем текст был составлен более чем за столетие до рождества Христова и дошел до н…

🔥15✍2❤2🙏2

3 Nov 2026, 11:09 UTC947 views16 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Перед вами палец Бир Хукера — это легенгендарный и не подтвержденный "официальной наукой" объект: мумифицированный человекоподобный палец гигантского размера (около 35–38 см в длину). В весной 1988 года швейцарский предприниматель и энтузиаст древней истории Грегор Шпёрри (Gregor Spörri) отправился в Египет. Через местных знакомых он вышел на пожилого фермера по имени Нагиб из деревни Бир Хукер (примерно в 100–120 к…

👀6🤯6👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 440 posts we hold for @X_Files_sekretnyye. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

ДРУГАЯ ИСТОРИЯ
@DrygaiIstoria · 40,403
#1
Шуман. НЛО. Планета Земля
@mistik_nlo · 969
#2
ОСВОБОЖДЕНИЕ
@osvobogdenie2021 · 3,219
#3
НЛО и рептилоиды
@UFO_and_Reptilians · 2,283
#4
Уфология 👽
@ufology_news_ufo · 3,728
#5
WORSO
@Worso_Channel · 654
#6
Смещение Полюсов
@SmesheniePolusov · 2,910
#7
Black History
@Black_History · 92,971
#8
Энергетический канал
@Energych · 9,051
#9
Это факт
@etofackt · 242,820
#10
UFO CHANNEL 1 / КАНАЛ НЛО 1 / OVNI / PARANORMAL / X - FILES / ПРИВИДЕНИЯ
@UFOCHANNEL_1 · 2,409
#11
Жуткие факты
@scary_facts11 · 181,876
#12
Околосмертный опыт
@okolosmertnyyopyt · 6,477
#13
Тайны Космоса 🔭
@mycosmos · 129,740
#14
ПАРАНОРМАЛЬНОЕ
@para_nor_mall · 1,783
#15
Забытые руины
@narniyantik · 25,095
#16
Kosmos Time | Наука | Физика
@kosmostime · 63,172
#17
НЕОБЪЯСНИМО, НО ФАКТ
@neobyasnimofact · 22,116
#18
КиберПанк | Технологии Будущего | Technology
@technology_future_cyberpunk · 37,196
#19
Тайны и Загадки Истории
@ACCOPTI · 5,540
#20
Непознанное
@tayna24ru · 1,048
#21
Привет из Древности 🗿
@izdrevnosty · 621
#22
Паранормальные новости
@paranewsru · 472
#23
Божественный фотошоп
@design_hell · 29,544
#24
Проверь все сам!
@ProverSam · 4,643
#25
ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ МОЗГА ✨
@brain_capabilities · 2,127
#26
ЧЕРТОВЩИНА
@chrtschina_by · 3,039
#27
Хистори.Эко
@history_eco · 21,640
#28
Хистори.Эко:топ
@history_eco_top · 3,253
#29
Секретные Хроники
@sekretniehroniki · 3,732
#30
Забытый мир
@zabrowkavir · 12,047
#31
UFOTOP Реальные видео НЛО 🛸
@ufotop · 2,139
#32
Cyber Science
@cybersciense · 9,036
#33
НЛО и Пришельцы
@Aliens001 · 957
#34
Анекдоты 😂 Видеоприколы 😆
@anekdotu_top · 7,692
#35
Назад в Будущее
@peachblossomtalks · 12,434
#36
UFO/НЛО/OVNI/UAP SPACE 👽. Space travelers
@secretspaceprogram8 · 1,328
#37
Yaplakal.com
@yaplakal · 420,082
#38
UFOGRAM NEWS
@UFOGRAMNEWS · 807
#39
⚛️ ТОЧКА СВЯЗИ МИРОВ ⚛️
@tohkasvazi_108 · 10,586
#40
Watch the Sky
@LookUpToTheSky17 · 6,776
#41
CHAOSO DIENOS | Merginos ir santykiai
@ChaosoDienos · 420
#42
Одесский дворик
@odessadvorik · 247,092
#43
Солнце для Земли
@sun4earth · 1,482
#44
UFO НЛО OVNI SPACE 👽
@spacetraveler1 · 9,556
#45
🐺 FREEDOM🔱FIGHTERS⚓️🇦🇺⚔️🇺🇸⚔️🇨🇦⚔️🇧🇻⚔️🏴 ⚔️🏴 ⚔️ EXPOSING HUMAN TRAFFICKING🌏SPECIAL OBSERVATIONS
@freedomfightersworldwide · 3,589
#46
Будущее XXI века
@future_XXI · 4,318
#47
МЕХАНИК
@imehanik · 317,925
#48
U F O P E R S I A N
@ufopersian · 957 (as read 17 September 2026)
#49
یوفو۹۸ | UFO98 | مرز حقیقت
@ufo98 · 1,144
#50
𝑳𝒂 𝑳𝒍𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝑨𝒍 𝑴𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒐 — 𝙐𝙛𝙤𝙨 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙒𝙤𝙧𝙡𝙙
@OvnisenelMundo · 6,741
#51
Сколько это стоит?
@howcostg · 18,872
#52
Митино М125
@mitinobest · 2,036
#53
МЯСО | Мужская кухня
@mensreceipts · 39,496
#54
UNSER UNIVERSUM
@Unser_Universum · 3,057 (as read 17 September 2026)
#55
Riddle
@riddle_tg · 50,887
#56
Котизм 😺
@kotism · 7,826
#57
Мистические Хроники
@MysticalChronicles2024 · 500
#58
Папа римский ⚔️
@theholyfather1 · 2,509
#59
Еврейский юмор
@odessahumor · 25,476
#60
ЭНЕРГИЯ ДЕНЕГ
@money_energy_pro · 530
#61
UFOs
@ufoschannel · 1,230
#62
Дизайн интерьера| Ремонт
@remont5designe · 33,212
#63
История всего
@istorian · 10,887
#64
Троянский конь | IT, технологии
@trojan_anonym · 63,950
#65

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ДРУГАЯ ИСТОРИЯ
@DrygaiIstoria · 40,403
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 30 August 2026
НЕОБЪЯСНИМО, НО ФАКТ
@neobyasnimofact · 22,116
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 19 September 2026
Забытые руины
@narniyantik · 25,095
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
Дизайн интерьера| Ремонт
@remont5designe · 33,212
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 September 2026
Эффективный человек
@effective_official · 42,509
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“X-Files | Секретные материалы 👽” (@X_Files_sekretnyye), 23,709 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/X_Files_sekretnyye.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.