Channel
@CryptoFrogsGems
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,699subscribers
-360 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001496663342 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoFrogsGems |
| Created | Between 1 November 2019 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoFrogsGems |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:21 | 17,699 | -56 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 17,755 | -19 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:22 | 17,774 | -19 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:36 | 17,793 | -16 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:34 | 17,809 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 17,819 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 17,820 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 17,827 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 17,834 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 17,832 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 17,839 | -14 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 17,853 | -11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 17,864 | -9 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 17,873 | -17 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 17,890 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 17,899 | -7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 17,906 | -13 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 17,919 | -11 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 17,930 | -21 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 17,951 | first reading |
51 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 51 (23 July 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 107,045 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
$BTC is looking ready to load up for a huge move on the short term soon… 👀 As price continues to hold macro support between $76k-$77k, we can clearly see that volume has dropped SIGNIFICANTLY right at that major support level. This is exactly what we would typically see and expect right before a major increase in volatility to either the upside or downside. This is also very apparent from the VRVP, based on the sig…
$BTC is still struggling to hold above the weekly 100EMA… 👀 With price action being very choppy in the short term, it’s better to zoom out and look at the HTF support and resistance, which will give us a better understanding of why price is struggling to see a strong continuation higher or a strong breakdown. And when we zoom out, we can see that price is currently retesting a MAJOR macro resistance level at the 10…
The final macro $BTC resistance points are holding strong on the weekly… 👀 After a very bullish start last week, with price climbing back into the low $80k range, we still saw a major rejection at both the $82k ish level and the 100EMA. Both of these rejections occurred near the end of the week AND heading into the weekly close, which ended up seeing the weekly candle print a bearish gravestone doji. Now, this wee…
$BTC is starting to bounce on the short term here… 👀 Not too many price action developments over the past 24 hours on the short term. We have started to see a small bounce from the $77k level of support I talked about yesterday. If this bounce and rally can sustain, then it’s very likely we see a retest of the May lower high sitting at $82k-$83k. But if we can’t hold this level, then we must watch for the final LT…
Some moves are starting to come here for $BTC in the short term… 👀 As I talked about yesterday, I was keeping a close eye on the weakening uptrend Bitcoin was forming on the 4H chart, which has now started to break to the downside. Price has found a very strong level of support around the $77k level on the VRVP and has yet to retest $76k. Until we break below $76k here, we should expect price to continue slowly ch…
What a cook…
Holy shit somebody just hit a 168,891x on MetaWin If you gamble make sure you’re not getting ripped off doing it anywhere else MetaWin is one of very few casinos who actually let you withdraw your full winnings immediately And they have the best rewards of any casino on CT by far They’re giving away $400k to their players this week alone If you deposit on metawin.com, you qualify for part of it
Let’s take a look at the $BTC 4H chart. Price is currently holding its strong support level around $76k while also forming a clear uptrend over the past few days. While this is happening, price is slowly but surely creeping up toward the BULL MARKET breakout zone sitting around $82k-$83k. This $82k-$83k level is the prior lower high we formed back in May, which would mean the current downtrend we have seen since Oc…
I’m still keeping an eye on all these short term $BTC targets… 👀 With price action beginning to see some strong sideways price action, it’s still safe to assume we are likely to see some sort of buyer exhaustion sooner rather than later. All these levels of support are based on both the VRVP and prior BOSs. As long as we bounce and stay above any or all of these short term support levels, we should still expect hig…
$BTC is showing even more strength on the HTF… 👀 As we start the new week, it’s clear that Bitcoin is yet again showing lots of strength, and the odds are undoubtedly shifting in favour of a macro reversal. I would not be surprised if we saw a retest of the prior highs around the low $80k level before seeing a strong rejection to create a higher low at new support levels. It’s also important to note that the weekl…
Still very similar expectations for $BTC here in the short term… 👀 With how strong price has been holding over this low-volume weekend, I could very well see this $BTC rally continuing into the start of this coming week. If we don’t see a break of the highs sooner rather than later, though, I’ve marked out all the levels I’m keeping a close eye on for bounces and new MTF lower highs to form. With how crazy of a ra…
Taking a look at $BTC on the very immediate short term… 👀 As we can see, price is starting to range and show some signs of buying exhaustion around its local highs, which is leading me to believe we will likely see a pullback sooner rather than later. I have marked out every major level I’m keeping an eye on to see how price reacts. Each of these levels is either a prior point of liquidity on the VRVP or a prior BO…
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @CryptoFrogsGems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoFrog's Gems 💎🐸” (@CryptoFrogsGems), 17,699 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoFrogsGems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.