Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🎯Lyxe’s Degen🎯

Channel

🎯Lyxe’s Degen🎯

@lyxedegen

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

40,783subscribers

-2,262 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002080773882
TypeChannel
Username@lyxedegen
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/lyxedegen

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

40,78343,04541,9147 August 2026 — 43,045 subscribers7 August 2026 — 43,039 subscribers8 August 2026 — 43,011 subscribers9 August 2026 — 42,967 subscribers11 August 2026 — 42,936 subscribers11 August 2026 — 42,902 subscribers12 August 2026 — 42,888 subscribers14 August 2026 — 42,856 subscribers15 August 2026 — 42,813 subscribers16 August 2026 — 42,784 subscribers17 August 2026 — 42,755 subscribers19 August 2026 — 42,726 subscribers20 August 2026 — 42,695 subscribers21 August 2026 — 42,673 subscribers22 August 2026 — 42,648 subscribers24 August 2026 — 42,663 subscribers25 August 2026 — 42,626 subscribers26 August 2026 — 42,594 subscribers27 August 2026 — 42,576 subscribers28 August 2026 — 42,549 subscribers29 August 2026 — 42,521 subscribers30 August 2026 — 42,534 subscribers31 August 2026 — 42,506 subscribers1 September 2026 — 42,488 subscribers3 September 2026 — 42,459 subscribers4 September 2026 — 42,424 subscribers6 September 2026 — 42,390 subscribers10 September 2026 — 42,319 subscribers12 September 2026 — 42,246 subscribers14 September 2026 — 42,194 subscribers15 September 2026 — 42,143 subscribers18 September 2026 — 42,080 subscribers29 September 2026 — 41,759 subscribers5 October 2026 — 41,629 subscribers9 October 2026 — 41,511 subscribers13 October 2026 — 41,418 subscribers14 October 2026 — 41,382 subscribers16 October 2026 — 41,352 subscribers17 October 2026 — 41,320 subscribers18 October 2026 — 41,286 subscribers18 October 2026 — 41,262 subscribers20 October 2026 — 41,232 subscribers21 October 2026 — 41,196 subscribers22 October 2026 — 41,159 subscribers23 October 2026 — 41,134 subscribers24 October 2026 — 41,113 subscribers25 October 2026 — 41,090 subscribers26 October 2026 — 41,077 subscribers27 October 2026 — 41,061 subscribers28 October 2026 — 41,037 subscribers29 October 2026 — 41,010 subscribers30 October 2026 — 40,988 subscribers31 October 2026 — 40,960 subscribers1 November 2026 — 40,938 subscribers2 November 2026 — 40,926 subscribers3 November 2026 — 40,901 subscribers5 November 2026 — 40,877 subscribers5 November 2026 — 40,847 subscribers6 November 2026 — 40,810 subscribers7 November 2026 — 40,783 subscribers7 August 20267 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net -2,262. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,444–43,384 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 20:0640,783-27
6 Nov 2026, 21:1040,810-37
5 Nov 2026, 23:2040,847-30
5 Nov 2026, 00:0740,877-24
3 Nov 2026, 21:1840,901-25
2 Nov 2026, 20:1540,926-12
1 Nov 2026, 20:5640,938-22
31 Oct 2026, 21:0840,960-28
30 Oct 2026, 19:1940,988-22
29 Oct 2026, 18:1941,010-27
28 Oct 2026, 19:3041,037-24
27 Oct 2026, 16:4641,061-16
26 Oct 2026, 13:1641,077-13
25 Oct 2026, 15:0541,090-23
24 Oct 2026, 11:3641,113-21
23 Oct 2026, 10:4041,134-25
22 Oct 2026, 08:1641,159-37
21 Oct 2026, 04:0541,196-36
20 Oct 2026, 00:1641,232-30
18 Oct 2026, 23:0941,262first reading

Engagement

234 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 180 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.4%
avg views ÷ 40,783 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,220
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.395%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 234 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held234 (28 July 2026 – 31 October 2026)
Views total76,040
Reactions total268
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 09:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,030
Videos
≈22
Links
≈176

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
34s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,151 reactions across 226 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,21453.3%
🔥1,18128.5%
😁1724.14%
👍922.22%
🤪511.23%
🤯511.23%
😱471.13%
💯380.915%
🆒370.891%
👀280.675%
👏260.626%
🍌230.554%
🌭190.458%
🦄190.458%
🌚170.41%
🐳150.361%
🥰150.361%
🤝140.337%
👌130.313%
🕊130.313%
13 further kinds661.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 227 of the 234 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,151 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 234 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 234 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lyxedegen. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 234 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 31 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (5.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

31 Oct 2026, 12:53 UTC≈2,360 views17 reactionsread 8 November 2026

he called $DARK at like 300k btw 👀 he put it on my radar

❤17

31 Oct 2026, 12:51 UTC≈2,400 views15 reactionsread 8 November 2026

vote for InsideCalls in GMGN trading comp!

❤15

31 Oct 2026, 12:51 UTC≈2,440 views8 reactionsread 8 November 2026

https://x.com/insidecalls/status/2116512509817745741?a=HvL5Cem9TTFHXlmr_sI&s=46

❤8

28 Oct 2026, 06:13 UTC≈3,250 views25 reactionsread 8 November 2026

good morning 🫡

❤14🔥3🍌2👍2🤝2🎃1🥰1

27 Oct 2026, 12:52 UTC≈3,460 views16 reactionsread 8 November 2026

0x787873c9ae96855bdb032f6ff1ef76a5e1fc8adc

🔥10❤6

27 Oct 2026, 12:52 UTC≈5,140 views16 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

bought $GROKLET on ETH mascot of grok that Elon himself confirmed Grok is trending asf right now, lot of the best AI people I know have switched to grok. only a matter of time before a mascot runner like this goes crazy imo

🔥13❤3

21 Oct 2026, 17:13 UTC≈5,420 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026

🦶 blknoiz06 followed darkwoodslabs darkwoods (darkwoodslabs) 0 Following | 1,408 Followers The private AI lab on @RobinhoodApp 📍 🔗 http://darkwoods.ai

❤2

21 Oct 2026, 14:41 UTC≈3,690 views12 reactionsread 8 November 2026

0xDc45b71d7203c2e8baafC43A19BcA0Eb993bB54E

🔥9❤3

21 Oct 2026, 14:41 UTC≈3,470 views9 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

$NEAR whales blasting Darkwoods 👀

🔥9

21 Oct 2026, 10:46 UTC≈3,410 views14 reactionsread 8 November 2026

$USELESS to a billy, plan hasn’t changed. I’ve sold some of my spot bag on FOMO to build a leverage position in $USELESS because i wanted more exposure…

❤14

Showing the 12 most recent of 234 posts we hold for @lyxedegen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Lyxe’s Journal
@cryptolyxecalls · 53,437
#1
Meraki
@meraki · 21,378
#2
Clearly Degen
@clearlydegen · 16,834
#3
Shmoos Journal ✍️
@shmooscasino · 29,311
#4
Wulf Calls
@wulfcryptocalls · 27,610
#5
Cowboy’s Alpha👑
@Cryptocowboyx · 30,675
#6
Daw Crypto
@dawcalls · 17,790
#7
EVENING’s CRYPTO
@eveningscrypto · 2,465
#8
Calculated Calls - Community Telegram
@calcfree · 7,385
#9
Shmoo’s Calls
@shmooscalls · 36,718
#10
Pigeon Calls
@pigeon_crypto · 3,926
#11
💎SHIFTER CALLS (FREE)💎
@SHIFTERFREECALLS · 24,512
#12
Turbo's Office
@turboscooks · 1,467
#13
Crypto mix
@cryptomixcalls · 2,674
#14
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,140
#15
WinnersPathway
@winnerspathway · 2,012
#16
Renzos Degen Alpha
@degenrenzo · 18,584
#17
DonuttCrypto Calls🍩💎
@donuttcryptocalls · 2,234
#18
CryptoFrog's Gems 💎🐸
@CryptoFrogsGems · 17,009
#19
Crypto Trooper
@cryptotrooperr · 3,907
#20
Calls From Within
@callsfromwithin · 3,224
#21
Brozinkers
@brozinkers · 52,371
#22
SHENJI COOKS 👨‍🍳
@SHENJICOOKS · 1,438
#23
Insyder's Casino
@insydercasino · 13,448
#24
Zin’s Trenches
@Zinsgamble · 14,069
#25
BMC Calls
@ShitcoinJournal · 1,405
#26
Wings Calls
@wingsscallss · 17,058
#27
Renzos Alpha
@renzosalpha · 82,067
#28
Yeeti calls (free) 🥶
@freeyeeticalls · 1,370
#29
lowkey
@rennyoncrypto · 2,174
#30
CryptoFrog's Degens
@CryptoFrogsDegens · 3,599
#31
Solanamemecoins.io 🐢
@SolanaMemeCoinsss · 5,959
#32
Dior’s Alpha ‼️🚀
@Diorscabal · 23,729
#33
Shah’s Journal
@shahlito · 30,916
#34
The Dojo | Prodigy ⚖️🧧
@cryptoprodigyz · 1,970
#35
Wasta Degeneracy Journal.
@WastaDegeneracy · 13,905
#36
Octobers Calls
@OctoberCalls · 1,865
#37
Crypto Crores Calls
@cryptocroresofficial · 8,066
#38
👑Chappo Calls (Free)👑
@cryptochappo · 9,049
#39
Giga’s Degens
@GIGADEGENS · 331
#40
blakes alpha calls
@calledbyblake · 2,478
#41
Solstice’s moonshots
@solsticesmoonshots · 27,786
#42
Duncan Plays 🧙‍♂️
@duncanplays · 14,619
#43
Crypto Richie
@richiecrypto · 9,135
#44
Trooper's Degen
@troopersdegen · 587
#45
DJ’s Casino😈
@Djplays · 11,134
#46
Iced's House of Degeneracy
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,643
#47
Fomo’s Mojo Dojo Casa House
@fomomofosol · 14,230
#48
Even More Degen (Gambles)
@evenmoredegen · 4,082
#49
Creeper Community 💎
@creepercalls · 12,404
#50
Zin Trades
@CryptoZinTrades · 39,003
#51
Mysterio Calls
@mysterio_calls · 8,706
#52
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 632,041
#53
Thug Crypto
@thugcryptocalls · 1,983
#54
- YourKai Calls -
@YourKaiCalls · 1,838
#55
Panther’s Call
@Pantherscall · 3,936
#56
Marcell's Trenches
@marcellcooks · 46,997
#57
Gambles 🎲 MadApes
@mad_apes_gambles · 97,229
#58
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 36,343
#59
Ralph’s Call
@ralphscall · 28,963
#60
Milan’s Calls🫀
@MilansNetwork · 3,643
#61
Chimera - Public
@TradeOnChimeraTG · 715
#62
@FINDERTRENDING 💎
@findertrending · 26,491
#63
Cryptonicks
@Cryptoniicks · 8,061
#64
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 111,145
#65
$HACK ANNOUNCEMENTS
@HakoiriAnnouncements · 173
#66
Ram's Gems Calls ✨
@ramcalls · 39,597
#67
tcgcommunity
@topcryptogem1 · 565
#68
Mrpunk Gamble
@Mrpunkgamble · 7,458
#69
Riskeh degens
@riskehplaya · 2,694
#70
@TRENDING (ETH / SOL)
@trending · 456,093
#71
LUIS CALLS
@luis100xcalls · 5,432
#72
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,052
#73

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Meraki
@meraki · 21,378
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 September 2026
Lyxe’s Journal
@cryptolyxecalls · 53,437
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
Wulf Calls
@wulfcryptocalls · 27,610
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026
Shmoos Journal ✍️
@shmooscasino · 29,311
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 7 September 2026
Cowboy’s Alpha👑
@Cryptocowboyx · 30,675
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 September 2026
Shmoo’s Calls
@shmooscalls · 36,718
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
Renzos Alpha
@renzosalpha · 82,067
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
GS Memecoins (Public)
@degenwar · 22,685
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 September 2026
💎SHIFTER CALLS (FREE)💎
@SHIFTERFREECALLS · 24,512
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 September 2026
Tyga's Solana Playss
@dibwe09zlksa · 27,799
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 6 September 2026
Crypto Mason
@cryptomasun · 28,187
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 September 2026
Boblles Channel
@crypto_bobles · 47,280
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
solmemesignals
@SolMemeSignals · 4
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 24 August 2026
HD’s Crypto Casino
@wallethuntersio · 23,008
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 16 September 2026
Renzos Degen Alpha
@degenrenzo · 18,584
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 3 October 2026
Crypto Trade 247
@crypto_tradegroup · 21,481
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 22 September 2026
MemeCoin Whale Pumps
@MemeCoin_Whale_Pumps · 107,421
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
The Real World Official
@TheRealWorldAG · 56,660
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 25 August 2026
Zin Trades
@CryptoZinTrades · 39,003
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
Shinobi Signals
@ShinobiSignals · 31,132
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 4 September 2026
Crypto Taha Free Group
@CryptoTaha11 · 28,081
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
TeamTate Updates
@TatesRealLifeUpdates · 44,563
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 August 2026
Cryptoxnft | Free Crypto & BTC Updates 📈
@cryptoxnfts · 45,741
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🎯Lyxe’s Degen🎯” (@lyxedegen), 40,783 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lyxedegen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.